Adverse perinatal outcomes disproportionately affect minoritized and lower-income women in the United States and are often linked to employment, insurance, and education. This study investigated whether these disparities persist in the Military Health System (MHS) among active-duty service women (ADSW), an employed, universally insured population with at least a secondary education.
Methods:
This cross-sectional study used data claims of ADSW ages 17–49 with births during 2016–2023. International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision (ICD-10) diagnostic, Medicare Severity Diagnosis Related Group, and Current Procedural Terminology codes were used to identify births, perinatal outcomes, and maternal comorbidities. Analyses included descriptive statistics of patient demographics including race, rank as a proxy for socioeconomic status, and incidence of perinatal interventions and outcomes; and modified Poisson regressions assessing variation between groups.
Results:
There were 218,386 births by 158,012 ADSW in fiscal year 2016–2023, with the greatest representation among White (42.91%), Black (27.16%), and enlisted (82.63%) members. Black, Asian and Pacific Islander, and American Indian/Alaska Native women showed higher risk of preterm labor, induction of labor, and cesarean section, whereas Asian and Pacific Islander and American Indian/Alaska Native women also had higher risk of postpartum hemorrhage. Officers had a higher risk for cesarean births, perineal lacerations, postpartum hemorrhage, and high-risk pregnancy at ages 35 and older.
Conclusions:
In this study, ADSW of minoritized races and lower rank experienced disparities in perinatal outcomes in the MHS. Lower hemorrhage risk for Black women contrasts with national data but aligns with previous MHS studies. Further research is needed to determine the factors influencing both positive and negative outcomes for ADSW.
MetcalfeA, WickJ, RonksleyP. Racial disparities in comorbidity and severe maternal morbidity/mortality in the United States: An analysis of temporal trends. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 2018; 97(1):89–96; doi: 10.1111/aogs.13245
4.
MartinJA, HamiltonBE, OstermanMJ, et al.Births: Final data for 2019. Natl Vital Stat Rep, 2021; 70(2):1–51.
5.
EngelhardtKA, Hisle-GormanE, GormanGH, et al.Lower preterm birth rates but persistent racial disparities in an open-access health care system. Mil Med, 2018; 183(9–10):e570–e575; doi: 10.1093/milmed/usy012
6.
WangE, GlazerKB, HowellEA, et al.Social determinants of pregnancy-related mortality and Morbidity in the United States: A systematic review. Obstet Gynecol, 2020; 135(4):896–915; doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003762
7.
DawJR, KolenicGE, DaltonVK, et al.Racial and ethnic disparities in perinatal insurance coverage. Obstet Gynecol, 2020; 135(4):917–924; doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003728
RanjitA, AndriottiT, MadsenC, et al.Does universal coverage mitigate racial disparities in potentially avoidable maternal complications? Am J Perinatol, 2021; 38(8):848–856; doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1701195
10.
RanjitA, ChaudharyMA, JiangW, et al.Disparities in receipt of a laparoscopic operation for ectopic pregnancy among TRICARE beneficiaries. Surgery, 2017; 161(5):1341–1347; doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.09.029
SchoenfeldAJ, KajiAH, HaiderAH. Practical guide to surgical datasets: Military Health System TRICARE encounter data. JAMA Surg, 2018; 153(7):679–680; doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.0480
14.
HunterA, BanaagA, LutgendorfM, et al.Volume as an indicator for outcomes for severe maternal morbidity in the Military Health System. Mil Med, 2022; 187(7–8):e963–e968; doi: 10.1093/milmed/usab442
Uribe-LeitzT, MatsasB, DaltonMK, et al.Geospatial analysis of access to emergency cesarean delivery for military and civilian populations in the US. JAMA Netw Open, 2022; 5(1):e2142835; doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.42835
17.
BarcaJA, BravoC, Pintado-RecarteMP, et al.Risk factors in third- and fourth-degree perineal tears in women in a tertiary centre: An observational ambispective cohort study. J Pers Med, 2021; 11(8):685; doi: 10.3390/jpm11080685
18.
HamlinL, GrunwaldL, SturdivantRX, et al.Comparison of nurse-midwife and physician birth outcomes in the Military Health System. Policy Polit Nurs Pract, 2021; 22(2):105–113; doi: 10.1177/1527154421994071
19.
Government Accountability Office. Midwives: Information on births, workforce, and midwifery education. 2023. Available from: https://www.gao.gov/assets/gao-23-105861.pdf [Last accessed: March11, 2024].
MartinJA, OstermanMJK. Shifts in the distribution of births by gestational age: United States, 2014–2022. National Vital Statistics Report, 2024; 73(1).
27.
FinkDA, KildayD, CaoZ, et al.Trends in maternal mortality and severe maternal morbidity during delivery-related hospitalizations in the United States, 2008 to 2021. JAMA Netw Open, 2023; 6(6):e2317641; doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.17641
28.
ClaridyMD, Hernandez-GreenN, RathbunSL, et al.Community level factors and racial inequities in delivery hospitalizations involving severe maternal morbidity in the United States, 2016–2019. Sci Rep, 2024; 14(1):19297; doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-70130-1
29.
SheikhJ, AlloteyJ, KewT, et al.; IPPIC Collaborative Network. Effects of race on perinatal outcomes in high- and upper-middle-income countries: Individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis of 2,198,655 pregnancies. Lancet, 2022; 400(10368):2049–2062; doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01191-6
30.
OkunlolaO, RazaS, OsasanS, et al.Race/ethnicity as a risk factor in the development of postpartum hemorrhage: A thorough systematic review of disparity in the relationship between pregnancy and the rate of postpartum hemorrhage. Cureus, 2022; 14(6):e26460; doi: 10.7759/cureus.26460
31.
BommireddiA, GargB, CaugheyA. Maternal race and postpartum hemorrhage in women with a prior postpartum hemorrhage. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2021; 224(2); doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.12.992
NguyenLL, SmithAD, ScullyRE, et al.Provider-induced demand in the treatment of carotid artery stenosis: Variation in treatment decisions between private sector fee-for-service vs salary-based military physicians. JAMA Surg, 2017; 152(6):565–572; doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.0077
37.
SchoenfeldAJ, MakanjiH, JiangW, et al.Is there variation in procedural utilization for lumbar spine disorders between a fee-for-service and salaried healthcare system? Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2017; 475(12):2838–2844; doi: 10.1007/s11999-017-5229-5
38.
DietrichE, SantiagoC, LerouxT, et al.Assessing practice pattern differences in the treatment of acute low back pain in the United States Military Health System. BMC Health Serv Res, 2018; 18(1):720; doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3525-8
39.
BryantBE, JordanA, ClarkUS. Race as a social construct in psychiatry research and practice. JAMA Psychiatry, 2022; 79(2):93–94; doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2021.2877
40.
DavisBA. Discrimination: A social determinant of health inequities. Health Affairs Forefront, 2020; doi: 10.1377/forefront.20200220.518458
41.
YearbyR, ClarkB, FigueroaJF. Structural racism in historical and modern healthcare policy. Health Aff, 2022; 41(2):187–194; doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2021.01466
42.
BazarganM, CobbS, AssariS. Discrimination and medical mistrust in a racially and ethnically diverse sample of California adults. Ann Fam Med, 2021; 19(1):4–15; doi: 10.1370/afm.2632
43.
Swilley-MartinezME, ColesSA, MillerVE, et al.“We adjusted for race”: now what? A systematic review of utilization and reporting of race in American Journal of Epidemiology and Epidemiology, 2020–2021. Epidemiol Rev, 2023; 45(1):15–31; doi: 10.1093/epirev/mxad010
44.
ColeAP, TrinhQD. Secondary data analysis: Techniques for comparing interventions and their limitations. Curr Opin Urol, 2017; 27(4):354–359; doi: 10.1097/mou.0000000000000407
45.
JungkunzM, KöngeterA, MehlisK, et al.Secondary use of clinical data in data-gathering, non-interventional research or learning activities: Definition, types, and a framework for risk assessment. J Med Internet Res, 2021; 23(6):e26631; doi: 10.2196/26631
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
