BaerD. (1988). Foreword. In RuschF. R.RoseT.GreenwoodC. (Eds.), Introduction to special education and behavior analysis (p. ix-xi). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
2.
BellamyG. T.HornerR.InmanD. (1978). Vocational habilitation of severely retarded adults: A direct services technology. Baltimore: University Park Press.
3.
BellamyG. T.PetersonL.CloseD. (1975). Habilitation of the severely and profoundly retarded. Illustrations of competence. Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded, 10, 174–186.
4.
BersaniH. (1995). Leadership: Where we've been, where we are, where we are going. Institute on Community Integration IMPACT, 8, 2–3.
5.
FabianE. S.LueckingR. G. (1991). Doing it the company way: Using internal company supports in the workplace. Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling, 22(2), 32–35.
6.
HagnerD.FarisJ. R. (1994). Inclusion and support in the workplace, naturally. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, Atlanta, GA.
7.
HoodE. L.TestD. W.SpoonerF.SteeleR. (in press). Paid co-worker support for individuals with severe and multiple disabilities. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities.
8.
KennedyM. J. (1996). Self-determination and trust: My experiences and thoughts. In SandsD.WehmeyerM. (Eds.), Self-determination across the life span: Independence and choice for people with disabilities (pp. 35–47). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
9.
MankD.CoiffiA.YovanoffP. (in press). An analysis of the typicalness of supported employment jobs, natural supports, and wage and integration outcomes. Mental Retardation.
10.
NirjeB. (1969). The normalization principle and its human management implications. In KugelR.WolfensbergerW. (Eds.), Changing patterns in residential services for the mentally retarded (pp. 179–195). Washington, DC: President's Committee on Mental Retardation.
11.
NisbetJ.HagnerD. (1988). Natural supports in the workplace: A reexamination of supported employment. Journal of The Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 13, 260–267.
12.
RoganP.HagnerD.MurphyS. (1993). Natural supports: Reconceptualizing job coach roles. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 18, 275–281.
13.
RuschF. R. (in press). Understanding disabilities: The emergence of our understanding of sameness. In DevliegerP. J.RuschF. R. (Eds.), Similar and different: Core concepts and the coming of disabilities studies. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing.
14.
RuschF. R. (1990). Supported employment models methods and issues. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing.
15.
RuschF. R.MithaugD.E. (1980). Vocational training for mentally retarded adults: A behavior analytic approach. Champaign, IL: Research Press.
16.
RuschF. R.HughesC.JohnsonJ.MinchK. (1991). A descriptive analysis of co-worker involvement in supported employment. Mental Retardation, 29, 207–212.
17.
RuschF. R.MorganT. K.MartinJ. E.RivaM.AgranM. (1985). Competitive employment: Teaching mentally retarded employees self-instructional strategies. Applied Research in Mental Retardation, 6, 389–407.
18.
ShapiroJ. P. (1993). No pity: People with disabilities forging a new civil rights movement. New York: Times Books.
19.
TestD. W.WoodW. M. (1996). Natural supports in the workplace: The jury is still out. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 21, 155–173.
20.
WehmanP. (1981). Competitive employment: New horizons for severely disabled individuals. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
21.
WestM. D.ParentW. S. (1995). Community and *workplace supports for individuals with severe mental illness in supported employment. Psychosocial Rehabilitation Journal, 18(4), 13–24.
22.
WhiteD. M. (1986). Social validation. In RuschF. R. (Ed.),. Competitive employment issues and strategies (pp. 199–213). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing.
23.
WolfM. M. (1978). Social validity: The case for subjective measurement or how applied behavior analysis is finding its heart. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 203–214.
24.
WolfensbergerW. (1972). Normalization: The principle of normalization in human services. Toronto, Canada: National Institute on Mental Retardation.