Survey data from a national, random sample of 643 service providers were analyzed to examine past, current, and future utilization of integrated and segregated day and employment services. The percentage of persons in integrated employment increased to 30% in 1991, from a total of 17% documented during 1986. However, the average number of persons served in segregated, facility-based work programs has also increased since 1986, and half the respondents (N = 643) either planned to start new facility-based programs, maintain the current service capacity, or increase the number served by 1997. Implications of a dual system of integrated versus segregated services and potential incentives for stimulating conversion of facility-based services are discussed.
AgostaJ.BrownL.MeldaK. (1993). Results of a national survey of program administrators. In Job coaching and community integrated employment: Present conditions and emerging directions (Brief Report No. 3). Salem, OR: Human Services Research Institute.
2.
AlbinJ. M. (1992). Quality improvement in employment and other human services: Managing for quality through change. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
3.
AlbinJ. M.RhodesL.MankD. (1994). Realigning organizational culture, resources, and community roles: Changeover to community employment. In Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 19(2), pp. 105–115.
4.
BellamyG.T.HornerR.H.InmanD. (1979). Vocational habilitation of severely retarded adults: A direct service technology. Baltimore: University Park Press.
5.
BellamyG. T.RhodesL. E.BourbeauP. E.MankD. M. (1986). Mental retardation services in sheltered workshops and day activity programs: Consumer benefits and policy alternatives. In RuschF. (Ed.), Competitive employment issues and strategies (pp. 257–271). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
6.
BuckleyJ.BellamyG. T. (1984). National survey of day and vocational programs: For adults with severe disabilities. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University.
7.
BraddockD.HempR.FujiuraG. (1995). State of the states in developmental disabilities services. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
8.
GoldM. (1973). Research on the vocational habilitation of the retarded: The present, the future. In EllisN. (Ed.), International review of research in mental retardation, Vol. 6 (pp. 97–147). New York: Academic Press.
9.
HollsappleM. (May, 1995). Personal conversation. Portland, OR.
10.
KoltonG. (1983). Introduction to survey sampling. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
11.
KiernanW. E.McGaugheyM. J.SchalockR. L. (1988). Employment environments and outcomes for adults with developmental disabilities. Mental Retardation, 26, 279–288.
12.
KiernanW. E.StarkJ. A. (Eds.). (1986). Pathways to employment for adults with developmental disabilities. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
13.
MankD. M. (1994). The underachievement of supported employment: A call for reinvestment. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 5(2), 2–24.
14.
MankD. M.RhodesL. E.BellamyG. T. (1986). Four supported employment alternatives. In KiernanW. E.StarkJ. A. (Eds.) Pathways to employment for adults with developmental disabilities (pp. 139–153). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
15.
McGaugheyM. J.KiernanW. E.LynchS. A.SchalockR. L.MorgansternD. R. (1991). National survey of day and employment programs for persons with developmental disabilities: Results from state MR/DD agencies. Boston: Training and Research Institute for People with Disabilities, Children's Hospital.
16.
McGaugheyM. J.KiernanW. E.McNallyL. C.GilmoreD. S. (1995). A peaceful coexistence: State MR/DD agency trends in integrated employment and facility-based services. Mental Retardation, 33, 170–180.
17.
MoonM. S.IngeK. J.WehmanP.BrookeV.BarcusJ. M. (1990). Helping persons with severe mental retardation get and keep employment: Supported employment strategies and outcomes. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
18.
National Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services. (November 1993). Selected programs affecting people with disabilities: H.R. 2518. New Directions, 23(11), p. 3.
19.
Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services. (1984). Supported employment for adults with severe disabilities: An OSERS program initiative. Washington, DC: Author.
20.
RocakT. (May, 1995). Personal conversation. Corvallis, OR: Bonney Enterprises.
21.
RuschF.MithaugD. (1980). Vocational training for mentally retarded adults: A behavior analytic approach. Champaign, IL: Research Press.
22.
SchalockR. L.McGaugheyM. J.KiernanW. E. (1989). Placement into nonsheltered employment: Findings from national employment surveys. American Journal of Mental Retardation, 94, 80–87.
23.
Virginia Commonwealth University, Rehabilitation Research and Training Center. (1991). A national analysis of supported employment implementation: Fiscal years 1986–1989. Richmond: VA: Author.
24.
WehmanP.KregelJ. (September, 1994). At the crossroads: Supported employment ten years later. In New Directions in Supported Employment. Richmond, VA: Rehabilitation Research 8#x38; Training Center on Supported Employment, Virginia Commonwealth University.
25.
WehmanP.KregelI.ShaferM. S. (1989). Emerging trends in the national supported employment initiative: A preliminary analysis of twenty-seven states. Richmond: Virginia Commonwealth University, Rehabilitation Research and Training Center on Supported Employment.
26.
WestM.RevellW. G.WehmanP. (1992). Achievements and challenges: A five-year report on consumer and system outcomes from the supported employment initiative. Journal of The Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 17, 227–235.
