Reforming outmoded systems of guardianship requires that governments assess personal support and related services. U.S. policy-makers and reformers in individual states have begun to question how current guardianship laws may disempower individuals with mental disabilities. This article explores some remarkable legal and public policy innovations in Sweden that replace guardianship with personal support services such as mentors, administrators, “kontakt” persons, and personal assistants. It then examines the impact of Sweden's reforms on the autonomy, independence, and integration of its citizens and discusses possibilities for similar changes worldwide.
American Bar Association [ABA]. (1989). Guardianship: An agenda for reform: Recommendations of the National Guardianship Symposium and policy of the American Bar Association. Washington, DC: Commission on the Mentally Disabled & Commission on Legal Problems of the Elderly, American Bar Association.
2.
American Bar Association Commission on Mental and Physical Disability Law. (1994). Key legal issues in funding and administering family support services for persons with disabilities, Mental & Physical Disability Law Reporter18, 215–224.
3.
ApolloniT.CookeT. P. (1984). A new look at guardianship: Protective services that support personalized living. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
4.
Associated Press. (1987, September). Guardians of the elderly: An ailing system, p. 1.
5.
Betankande fran Formyndarskap Utredingen, Foraldra Som Formyndare (SOU 1988:40). Stockholm: Swedish Government Publication Office.
6.
BorgenhammarE. (1989). Patients' rights and informed consent: Swedish experiences, Journal of Consumer Policy, 12, 277–294.
7.
BosworthB. P.RivlinA. M. (1987). The Swedish economy. Washington: The Brookings Institution.
8.
California Welfare & Institutions Code § 4648(a)(11) (1995 pocket part).
9.
ClintonB.GoreA. (1992). Putting people first: How we can all change America. New York: Time Books.
10.
ClintonW. J. (1993). Presidential proclamation on national disability employment awareness month. Washington, DC: The White House.
11.
ClintonW. J. (1994). Presidential proclamation on the anniversary of the Americans with Disabilities Act. Washington, DC: The White House.
12.
EckoffR. D.HerrS. S.HopkinsB. (1994). Letters; State plans for surrogate decision making, JAMA, 271, 849–850.
13.
EverittA. (1989). The new Sweden guardianship law. Unpublished manuscript.
14.
Family Support for Families of Children with Disabilities Act of 1994, Congressional Record, H10119–H10124 (Sept. 28, 1994), to be codified at 20 U.S.C. § 1491 (A-O).
15.
FosterR. (1987). Trends in mental health care in Austria in the past 25 years. International Journal of Mental Health, 16, 21–37.
16.
Health Security Act (1993), S.B. 1757, Title II-B.
17.
HellmannU. (1993, June). Minimizing guardianship, maximizing autonomy: Least restrictive alternatives in German Law. Paper presented at the XIX International Congress of the International Academy of Law and Mental Health, Lisbon, Portugal.
18.
HerrS. S. (1976). Rights into action: Protecting human rights of the mentally handicapped. Catholic University Law Review, 26, 203–318.
19.
HerrS. S. (1983). Rights and advocacy for retarded people, Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath.
20.
HerrS. S. (1987). Law and mental retardation: International trends and reforms. International Digest of Health Legislation, 38, 849–858.
21.
HerrS. S. (1992). Human rights and mental disability: Perspectives on Israel. Israel Law Review, 26, 142–194.
22.
HerrS. S.BostromB. A.BartonR. S. (1992). No place to go: Refusal of life-sustaining treatment by competent persons with physical disabilities. Issues in Law and Medicine, 8, 3–36.
23.
HerrS. S.HopkinsB. (1994) Health care decision-making for persons with disabilities: An alternative to guardianship. JAMA, 271, 1017–1022.
24.
HoffmanD.O'SullivanJ. (1994). Statute versus reality in Maryland: An analysis of guardianship files in four counties. Baltimore, MD: unpublished paper, University of Maryland School of Law, Law and Health Care Program.
25.
International League of Societies for the Mentally Handicapped (1969, May). Symposium on Guardianship of the Mentally Retarded. Brussels: Author.
26.
Law on Support and Services for Persons with Functional Impairments [LSS]1993:387(1994).
27.
Law No. 940. The Act on Provisions for Certain Mentally Retarded Persons (December 15, 1967).
28.
Law No. 569. The Act for Special Care for Persons Suffering from Disturbed Psychological Development (June 13, 1985).
29.
MasonD. (1995). Memorandum communication from Dacosta Mason, Legal Counsel for the Elderly, Washington, DC.
30.
Michigan Association for Retarded Citizens v. Wayne County Probate Judge, 49 Mich. App. 487, 261 N.W.2d 60 (1977).
31.
MinowM. (1990). Making all the difference: Inclusion, exclusion, and American law. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
32.
New State Ice Co. v. Liebmann, 285 U.S. 262, 311 (1932) (Brandeis, J., dissenting).
33.
Nursing Home Reform Act of 1987, 42 U.S.C. § 1396r (c)(2)(E) (West 1992).
34.
Patient Self-Determination Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1396a(W) (West Supp. 1995).
SalesB. D.PowellD. M.Van DuizendR. & Associates (1982). Disabled persons and the law: State legislative issues. New York: Plenum Press.
37.
Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1383(2)(A)-(2)(B) (1992).
38.
Swedish Commission on Policies for the Disabled (1991). Report of the 1989 Disability Commission. Disability, Welfare, Justice: Summary. Stockholm: Author.
39.
Swedish Commission on Policies for the Disabled (1992). A society for all: Summary. Stockholm: Author.
40.
SullivanR. (1993, July 8). Blind woman killed by a subway car. Victim falls on tracks and is hit by a passing train in Midtown. New York Times, p. B3.
41.
TurnbullH. R. (Ed.) (1977). Consent handbook. Washington: American Association on Mental Retardation.
