This study examined differences in attitude toward the social acceptability of training techniques commonly used in community-based sites (skill acquisition, reduction of inappropriate behaviors, and data collection techniques). The subjects (N = 178) in this investigation were volunteers and members of one of the following four groups: sheltered workshop staff, job coach staff, fast food restaurant staff, and business students. These groups of respondents represented individuals with a current or future involvement with persons having severe disabilities in community sites. Respondents were asked to complete the Survey of Community-based Training Procedures (SCTP) scale, which measured attitudes toward the social acceptability of antecedent, consequence, and data collection techniques. Results of the study indicated that groups of respondents differentially rated the social acceptability of training techniques. Factors affecting ratings of social acceptability are discussed and implications for future research delineated.
AlbertoP. A.TroutmanA. C. (1990). Applied behavior analysis for teachers (3rd ed.). Columbus, OH: Merrill.
2.
BillingsleyF. F.RomerL. T. (1983). Response prompting and the transfer of stimulus control: Methods, research, and a conceptual framework. The Journal of The Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 8, 3–10.
3.
BrownL.NisbetJ.FordA.SweetM.ShiragaB.YorkJ.LoomisR. (1983). The critical need for nonschool instruction in educational programs for severely handicapped students. The Journal of The Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 8, 71–77.
4.
CraigD. E.BoydW. E. (1990). Characteristics of employers of handicapped individuals. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 95, 40–43.
5.
FordA.MirendaP. (1984). Community instruction: A natural cues and corrections decision model. The Journal of The Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 9, 79–88.
6.
ForteJ.StoreyK.Gaylord-RossR. (1989). The social validation of community vocational training in technological work settings. Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded, 24, 149–156.
7.
IrvinL. K.LundervoldD. A. (1988). Social validation of decelerative (punishment) procedures by special educators of severely handicapped students. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 9, 331–350.
8.
KazdinA. E. (1977). Assessing the clinical or applied importance of behavior change through social validation. Behavior Modification, 1, 427–452.
9.
KazdinA. E. (1980). Acceptability of time out from reinforcement procedures for disruptive child behavior. Behavior Therapy, 11, 329–344.
10.
KazdinA. E. (1981). Acceptability of child treatment techniques: The influence of treatment efficacy and adverse side effects. Behavior Therapy, 12, 493–506.
11.
KazdinA. E. (1984). Acceptability of aversive procedures and medication as treatment alternatives for deviant child behavior. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 12, 289–302.
McDonnellJ.FergusonB. (1989). A comparison of time delay and decreasing prompt hierarchy strategies in teaching banking skills to students with moderate handicaps. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 22, 85–91.
14.
MenchettiB. M.RuschF. R.LamsonD. S. (1981). Social validation of behavioral training techniques: Assessing the normalizing qualities of competitive employment training procedures. The Journal of The Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 6, 6–15.
15.
MeyerL. H.EichingerJ.Park-LeeS. (1987). A validation of program quality indicators in educational services for students with severe disabilities. The Journal of The Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 12, 251–263.
16.
MiltenbergerR. G.LennoxD. B.ErfanianN. (1989). Acceptability of alternative treatments for persons with mental retardation: Ratings from institutional and community-based staff. American Journal and Mental Retardation, 9, 388–395.
17.
MoonM. S.IngeK.WehmanP.BrookeV.BarcusJ. M. (1990). Helping persons with severe mental retardation get and keep employment. Supported employment issues and strategies. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
18.
MorganR. L. (1989). Judgments of restrictiveness, social acceptability, and usage: Review of research on procedures to decrease behavior. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 94, 121–133.
19.
MorganR. L.StriefelS. (1987–88). Restrictiveness of procedures to decrease behavior: Views of school psychologists, administrators, teachers, and specialists. Journal of Special Education, 21, 108–121.
20.
NunnallyJ. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
21.
PhillipsJ. F.ReidD. H.KorabekC. A.HurshD. E. (1988). Community-based instruction with profoundly mentally retarded persons: Client and public responsiveness. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 9, 3–21.
22.
PickeringD.MorganS. B. (1985). Parental ratings of treatments of self-injurious behavior. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 15, 303–314.
23.
ReimersT. M.WackerD. P.KoepplG. (1987). Acceptability of behavioral interventions: A review of the literature. School Psychology Review, 16, 212–227.
24.
SchwartzI. S.BaerD. M. (1991). Social validity assessments: Is current practice state of the art?Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24, 189–204.
25.
SinghN. N.KatzR. C. (1985). On the modification of acceptability ratings for alternative child treatments. Behavior Modification, 9, 375–386.
26.
SinghN. N.WatsonJ. E.WintonA. S. W. (1987). Parents' acceptability ratings of alternative treatments for use with mentally retarded children. Behavior Modification, 11, 17–26.
27.
StoreyK.HornerR. H. (1991). An evaluative review of social validation research involving persons with handicaps. The Journal of Special Education, 25, 352–401.
28.
TarnowskiK. J.RasnakeL. K.MulickJ. A.KellyP. A. (1989). Acceptability of behavioral interventions for self-injurious behavior. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 93, 575–580.
29.
WehmanP.MoonM. S.EversonJ. M.WoodW.BarcusJ. M. (1988). Transition from school to work. New challenges for youth with severe disabilities. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
30.
WehmanP.SaleP.ParentW. (1992). Supported employment: Strategies for integration of workers with disabilities. Boston: Andover Medical Publishers.
31.
WoleryM.GastD. L. (1984). Effective and efficient procedures for the transfer of stimulus control. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 4(3), 52–77.
32.
WolfM. M. (1978). Social validity: The case for subjective measurement or how applied behavior analysis is finding its heart. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 203–214.
33.
WoodF. H.HillB. K. (1983). Aversiveness and frequency of use of commonly used interventions for problem behavior. Monograph in Behavior Disorders, 7, 28–34.
