The content and social validity of an educational planning tool named COACH (Choosing Options and Accommodations for Children) were explored through two studies. Study 1 presents questionnaire feedback from six groups of experts (N = 78) in the field of deaf-blindness and multiple disabilities regarding the purpose, philosophy, content, process, and presentation of COACH. Study 2 presents social validation feedback from parents whose children are deaf-blind and have multiple disabilities regarding a set of valued life outcomes included in COACH. The combined results of these studies provide initial validation that COACH is congruent with exemplary practice and offer consumer-based suggestions for its potential improvement.
BlattB. (1987). The conquest of mental retardation. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
2.
BogdanR.BiklenS. (1982). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
3.
BradleyV.KnollJ. (in press). Shifting paradigms in services to people with developmental disabilities. In KaranO.GreenspanS. (Eds.), The community revolution in disability services. Andover, MA: Andover Medical Publishers.
4.
BrendtroL. K.BrokenlegM.Van BockernS. (1990). Reclaiming youth at risk: Our hope for the future. Bloomington, IN: National Educational Service.
5.
CaponeA.Ross-AllenJ.DiVernereN.AbernathyN. (1991). Characteristics of family centered practitioners. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, Center for Developmental Disabilities—The University Affiliated Program of Vermont.
6.
DennisR. E.WilliamsW.GiangrecoM. F.CloningerC. J. (in press). Quality of life as a context for planning and evaluation of services for people with disabilities. Exceptional Children.
7.
DevereauxA. (1988). Value-based services: A parent perspective. In CovertA.CarrT. (Eds.), Value based services for young adults with deaf-blindness (pp. 23–26). Sands Point, NY: Helen Keller National Center for Deaf-Blind Youth and Adults—Technical Assistance Center, in cooperation with The Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps.
8.
FabianE. (1991). Using quality of life indicators in rehabilitation program evaluation. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 34, 334–356.
9.
FranklV. (1959). From death camp to existentialism. Boston: Beacon Press.
10.
FoxT.WilliamsW. (1991). Best practice guidelines for meeting the needs of all students in local schools. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, Center for Developmental Disabilities—The University Affiliated Program of Vermont.
11.
GiangrecoM.CloningerC.EdelmanS.DennisR. (1992). Evaluation of impact process. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, Center for Developmental Disabilities—The University Affiliated Program of Vermont. Unpublished manuscript.
12.
GiangrecoM. F.CloningerC.IversonV. (1993). Choosing options and accommodations for children: A guide to planning inclusive education. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
13.
GiangrecoM. F.CloningerC.MuellerP.YuanS.AshworthS. (1991). Perspectives of parents whose children have dual sensory impairments. The Journal of The Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 16, 14–24.
14.
KuncN. (1992). The need to belong: Rediscovering Maslow's hierarchy of needs. In VillaR.ThousandJ.StainbackW.StainbackS. (Eds.), Restructuring for caring and effective education: An administrative guide to creating heterogeneous schools (pp. 25–39). Baltimore: Paul H Brookes.
15.
MaslowA. (1970). Motivation and personality. New York: Harper 8#x38; Row.
16.
MeyerL.EichingerJ.Park-LeeS. (1987). A validation of program quality indicators in educational services for students with severe disabilities. The Journal of The Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 12, 251–263.
17.
PadillaR. V. (1991). Qualitative analysis with HyperQual (Verison 4.2). Chandler, AZ: Author. (Address: 3327 N. Dakota, Chandler, AZ 85225).
18.
PeckC. (1991). Linking values and science in social policy decisions affecting citizens with severe disabilities. In MeyerL.PeckC.BrownL. (Eds.), Critical issues in the lives of people with severe disabilities (pp. 1–23). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
19.
SAS Institute, Inc. (1992). Statistical analysis system (Version 6.07) [Computer program]. Cary, NC: Author.
20.
SchalockR. (1990a). Attempts to conceptualize and measure quality of life. In SchalockR.BogaleM. (Eds.), Quality of life: Perspectives and issues (pp. 141–148). Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Retardation.
21.
SchalockR. (1990b). Where do we go from here? In SchalockR.BogaleM. (Eds.), Quality of life: Perspectives and issues (pp. 27–40). Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Retardation.
22.
SpeightS.MyersL.CoxC.HighlenP. (1991). A redefinition of multicultural counseling. Journal of Counseling and Development, 70, 29–36.
23.
WilliamsW.FoxT.ThousandJ.FoxW. (1990). Level of acceptance and implementation of best educational practices in the education of students with severe handicaps in the state of Vermont. Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 25(2), 120–131.
24.
WolfensbergerW. (1970). The principle of normalization in human services. Toronto, Canada: National Institute on Mental Retardation.
