The purpose of this study was to explore the nature of spontaneous peer interactions in a full-inclusion preschool. Three children with profound disabilities were observed for a total of 480 min each in indoor and outdoor supervised play. Three children without disabilities were observed under the same conditions for comparison purposes. Results of the study showed variation in the behavior of the children with disabilities, but also showed that the children with disabilities had many opportunities to participate in peer social interactions and engaged in interactions comparable in length to those of their peers without disabilities. Findings also indicate that particular attention may need to be paid to the encouragement of initiating interactions and to helping young children without disabilities understand and respond to the idiosyncratic behaviors of peers with profound disabilities.
CavallaroS. A.PorterR. H. (1980). Peer preferences of at-risk and normally developing preschool children in a preschool mainstream classroom. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 84, 357–366.
2.
ChristieJ. F.WardleF. (1992). How much time for play?Young Children, 47(3), 28–33.
3.
CorsaroW. A. (1985). Friendship and peer culture in the early years. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Co.
4.
FaughtK. K.BallewegB. J.CrowR. E.PolR. A.van den (1983). An analysis of social behaviors among handicapped and nonhandicapped preschool children. Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded18, 210–214.
5.
FieldT.RosemanS.DeStafanoL.KoewlerJ. H. (1981). Play behaviors of handicapped preschool children in the presence and absence of nonhandicapped peers. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 2, 49–58.
6.
FieldT.RosemanS.DeStafanoL.KoewlerJ. H. (1982). The play of handicapped preschool children with handicapped and nonhandicapped peers in integrated and non-integrated situations. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 2(3), 28–38.
7.
GuralnickM. J. (1980). The social behavior of preschool children at different developmental levels: Effects of group composition. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 31, 115–130.
8.
GuralnickM. J. (1981). The efficacy of integrating handicapped children in early childhood settings: Research implications. Topics in Early Childhood Education, 1(1), 57–71.
9.
GuralnickM. J. (1990). Major accomplishments and future directions in early childhood mainstreaming. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 10(2), 1–17.
10.
GuranickM. J.GroomJ. M. (1988). Friendships of preschool children in mainstreamed playgroups. Developmental Psychology, 24, 595–604.
JenkinsJ. R.OdomS. L.SpeltzM. L. (1989). Effects of social integration on preschool children with handicaps. Exceptional Children, 55, 420–428.
13.
KohlerF. W.FowlerS. A. (1985). Training prosocial behaviors to young children: An analysis of reciprocity with untrained peers. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 18, 187–200.
14.
McEvoyM. A.OdomS. L.McConnellS. R. (1992). Peer social competence intervention for young children with disabilities. In OdomS. L.McConnellS. R.McEvoyM. A. (Eds.), Social competence of young children with disabilities (pp. 113–134). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
15.
McLeanM.HanlineM. F. (1990). Providing early intervention services in integrated environments: Challenges and opportunities for the future. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 10(2), 62–77.
16.
MeyerL. H.PeckC. A.BrownL. (1991). Critical issues in the lives of people with severe disabilities. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
17.
OdomS. L.McEvoyM. A. (1988). Integration of young children with handicaps and normally developing children. In OdomS. L.KarnesM. B. (Eds.), Early intervention for infants and children with handicaps (pp. 241–268). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
18.
OdomS. L.StrainP. S. (1986). A comparison of peer-initiation and teacher-antecedent interventions for promoting reciprocal social interaction of autistic preschoolers. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 19, 59–71.
19.
PetersonN. L. (1982). Social integration of handicapped and nonhandicapped preschoolers: A study of playmate preferences. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 2(2), 56–59.
20.
PetersonN. L.HaralickJ. G. (1977). Integration of handicapped and nonhandicapped preschoolers: An analysis of play behavior and social interaction. Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded, 12, 235–245.
21.
PutallazM. (1983). Predicting children's sociometric status from their behavior. Child Development, 54, 1417–1426.
22.
SalisburyC.BritzmanD.KahnJ. (1989). Using qualitative methods to assess the social-communication competence of young handicapped children. Journal of Early Intervention, 13, 153–164.
StrainP. S. (1984). Social behavior patterns of nonhandicapped-developmentally disabled friend pairs in mainstream preschools. Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 4, 15–28.
25.
StrainP. S. (1990). LRE for preschool children with handicaps: What we know, what we should be doing. Journal of Early Intervention, 14, 291–296.
26.
StrainP. S.TimmM. S. (1974). An experimental analysis of social interaction between a behaviorally disordered preschool child and her classroom peers. Journal of Applied Behavioral Analysis, 7, 583–590.
27.
StrayerF. F. (1980). Child ethology and the study of preschool social relations. In FootH.ChapmanA.SmithJ. (Eds.), Friendship and social relations in children (pp. 235–265). New York: John Wiley 8#x38; Sons.
28.
TaitP. E.WolfgangC. (1984). Mainstreaming a blind child: Problems perceived in a preschool day care program. Early Child Development and Care, 13, 155–167.
29.
ThompsonB.WickhamD.AultM. M.ShanksP.ReinertsonB.WegnerJ.GuessD. (1991, Winter). Expanding the circle of inclusion: Integrating young children with severe multiple disabilities. Montessori Life, pp. 11–15.
