Nonaversive behavior management is an approach to supporting people with undesirable behaviors that integrates technology and values. Although this approach has attracted numerous proponents, more adequate definition and empirical documentation are still needed. This article presents an introduction to the nonaversive approach. Important definitions are suggested, and three fundamental elements are presented: (a) an emerging set of procedures for supporting people with severe challenging behavior; (b) social validation criteria emphasizing personal dignity; and (c) a recommendation for prohibition or restriction of certain strategies. These elements are defined in hopes of stimulating further discussion and empirical analyses of positive behavioral support.
AzrinN. H.HolzW. C. (1966). Punishment. In HonigW. R. (Ed.), Operant behavior: Areas of research and application, (pp. 380–447). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
2.
BaerD. M.WolfM. M.RisleyT. R. (1968). Some current dimensions of applied behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 91–97.
3.
BaileyJ. S. (1987). Functional analysis. Presented at ABA Symposium, Nashville, TN.
4.
BanduraA. (1969). Principles of behavior modification.New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
5.
BerkmanK. A.MeyerL. H. (1988). Alternative strategies and multiple outcomes in the remediation of severe self-injury: Going “all out” nonaversively. Journal of The Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 13, 76–86.
6.
CarrE. G. (1988). Functional equivalence as a mechanism of response generalization. In HornerR. H.DunlapG.KoegelR. L. (Eds.), Generalization and maintenance: Life-style changes in applied settings, (pp. 221–241) Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
7.
CarrE. G.DurandV. M. (1985). Reducing behavior problems through functional communication training. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 18, 111–126.
8.
CarrE. G.TaylorJ. C.CarlsonJ. I.RobinsonS. (in press). Reinforcement and stimulus-based treatments for severe behavior problems in developmental disabilities. Proceedings of the Consensus Conference on the Treatment of Severe Behavior Problems and Developmental Disabilities. Washington, D.C.: National Institute of Health.
9.
DonnellanA. M.La VignaG. W.Negri-ShoultzN.FassbenderL. L. (1988). Progress without punishment: Effective approaches for learners with behavior problems.New York: Teachers College Press, Columbia University.
10.
DonnellanA. M.La VignaG. W.ZambitoJ.ThvedtJ. (1985). A time limited intensive intervention program model to support community placement for persons with severe behavior problems. Journal of The Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 10, 123–131.
11.
DurandV. M. (1988). Towards acceptable and effective intervention for severe behavior problems. In HornerR. H.DunlapG. (Eds.), Behavior management and community integration for individuals with developmental disabilities and severe behavior problems (pp. 83–96). Eugene: Specialized Training Program, University of Oregon.
12.
DurandV. M.CarrE. G. (1987). Social influences on “self-stimulatory” behavior: Analysis and treatment application. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 20, 119–132.
13.
DurandV. M.CrimminsD. M. (1988). Identifying the variables maintaining self-injurious behaviors. Journal of Autism & Developmental Disorders, 18(1), 99–117.
14.
DurandV. M.KishiG. (1987). Reducing severe behavior problems among persons with dual sensory impairments: An evaluation of a technical assistance model. Journal of The Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 12, 2–10.
15.
EvansI. M.MeyerL. H. (1985). An educative approach to behavior problems: A practical decision model for interventions with severely handicapped learners.Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
16.
FoxxR. M. (1982). Decreasing behaviors of severely retarded and autistic persons.Champaign, IL: Research Press.
17.
GastD. L.WoleryM. (1986). Severe maladaptive behaviors. In SnellM. E., (Ed.), Systematic instruction of persons with severe handicaps (3rd ed.) (pp. 300–332). Columbus, OH: Merrill Publishing.
18.
GuessD. (1988). Problems and issues pertaining to the transmission of behavior management technologies from researchers to practitioners. In HornerR. H.DunlapG. (Eds.) Behavior management and community integration for individuals with developmental disabilities and severe behavior problems (pp. 19–46). Eugene: Specialized Training Program, University of Oregon.
19.
GuessD.HelmstetterE.TurnbullH. R.KnowltonS. (1987). Use of aversive procedures with persons who are disabled: An historical review and critical analysis.Seattle: The Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps.
20.
HitzingW. (1988). Community support for people with challenging behaviors. Presentation at Oregon Developmental Disabilities Conference, Eugene.
21.
HornerR. H. (in press). The future of applied behavior analysis for people with severe disabilities. In MeyerL.PeckC.BrownL., (Eds.), Critical issues in the lives of people with severe disabilities.Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
22.
HornerR. H.AlbinR. W. (1988, September). Functional Analysis. Presentation at the Research and Training Center on Community-Referenced, Nonaversive Behavior Management National Conference, Santa Barbara, CA.
23.
HornerR. H.BillingsleyF. F. (1988). The effect of competing behavior on the generalization and maintenance of adaptive behavior in applied settings. In HornerR. H.DunlapG.KoegelR. L. (Eds.), Generalization and maintenance: Life-style changes in applied settings (pp. 197–220). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
24.
HornerR. H.BuddC. M. (1985). Teaching manual sign language to a nonverbal student: Generalization of sign use and collateral reduction of maladaptive behavior. Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded, 20, 39–47.
25.
HornerR. H.DayM.SpragueJ.O'BrienM.HeathfieldL. T. (in press). The effects of interspersed requests on challenging behavior during instruction. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis.
26.
HornerR. H.DunlapG.KoegelR. L. (1988). Generalization and maintenance: Life-style changes in applied settings.Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
27.
HuntP.AlwellM.GoetzL. (1988). Acquisition of conversation skills and the reduction of inappropriate social interaction behaviors. Journal of The Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 13, 20–27.
28.
IrvinL. K.SingerG. S. (1984). Human rights review manual.Eugene: Oregon Research Institute.
29.
IwataB. A. (1988). The development and adoption of controversial default technologies. The Behavior Analyst, 11, 149–157.
30.
IwataB. A.DorseyM. F.SliferJ.BaumanK. E.RichmanG. S. (1982). Toward a functional analysis of self-injury. Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities2, 3–20.
31.
JohnstonJ. M. (1988). Regulating the delivery of behavioral technology. In HornerR. H.DunlapG. (Eds.) Behavior management and community integration for individuals with developmental disabilities and severe behavior problems (pp. 6–18). Eugene: Specialized Training Program, University of Oregon.
32.
KanferF. H.SaslowG. (1969). Behavioral diagnosis. In FranksC. M. (Ed.), Behavior therapy: Appraisal and status (pp 417–444). New York: McGraw-Hill.
33.
Katzbill, State of California Proposed Legislation, AB520, 1988.
34.
KazdinA. E. (1980). Behavior modification in applied settings (2nd ed.). Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press.
35.
KernL.KoegelR. L.DunlapG. (1984). The influence of vigorous vs. mild exercise on autistic stereotyped behaviors. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 14, 57–67.
36.
KoegelR. L.KoegelL. K. (1988). Generalized responsivity and pivotal behaviors. In HornerR. H.DunlapG.KoegelR. L. (Eds.), Generalization and maintenance: Life-style changes in applied settings (pp. 41–66). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
37.
KoegelR. L.KoegelL. K. (1989). Community-referenced research on self-stimulation. In CipaniE. (Ed.), The treatment of severe behavior disorders: Behavior analysis approaches (pp. 129–150). American Association on Mental Retardation, Washington, D.C.
38.
KoegelR. L.KoegelL. K. (1990). Extended reductions in stereotypic behavior of students with autism through a self-management treatment program package. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 23, 119–127.
39.
KoegelR. L.KoegelL. K.MurphyC.RyanC. (1989). Assessing the effect of different teaching paradigms on disruptive behavior. Manuscript submitted for publication.
40.
LaVignaG. W.DonnellanA. M. (1986). Alternatives to punishment: Solving behavior problems with non-aversive strategies.New York: Irvington Publishers.
41.
LovaasO. I.FavellJ. E. (1987). Protection for clients undergoing aversive/restrictive interventions. Education and Treatment of Children, 10, 311–325.
42.
LuselliJ. K.MilesE.EvansT. P.BoyceD. A. (1985). Reinforcement control of severe dysfunctional behavior of blind, multihandicapped students. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 90, 328–334.
43.
MaceF. C.HockM. L.LalliJ. S.WestB. J.BelfioreP.PinterE.BrownD. K (1988). Behavioral momentum in the treatment of noncompliance. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 21, 123–141.
44.
MatsonJ. L.DiLorenzoT. M. (1984). Punishment and its alternatives: A new perspective for behavior modification (Vol. 13). New York: Springer Publishing.
45.
MatsonJ. LTarasM. E. (1989). A 20 year review of punishment and alternative methods to treat problem behaviors in developmentally delayed persons. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 10, 85–104.
46.
McGeeJ. J.MenolascinoF. J.HobbsD. C.MenousekP. E. (1987). Gentle teaching: A non-aversive approach to helping persons with mental retardation.New York: Human Sciences Press.
47.
MulickJ. A. (in press). The ideology and science of punishment in mental retardation. American Journal on Mental Retardation.
48.
MulickJ. A.SchroederS. R.RojahnJ. (1980). Chronic rumination and vomiting: A comparison of four treatment procedures. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 10, 203–213.
49.
O'BrienJ. (1987). A guide to lifestyle planning: Using the Activities Catalog to integrate services and natural support systems. In WilcoxB.BellamyG. T. (Eds.), A comprehensive guide to The Activities Catalog (pp. 175–189). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
50.
O'NeillR. E.HornerR. H.AlbinR. W.StoreyK.SpragueJ. (1988). Manual for the functional analysis of challenging behaviors. Unpublished manuscript. Eugene: Specialized Training Program, University of Oregon.
51.
PattersonG. R. (1982). Coercive family process.Eugene, OR: Castalia Publishing.
52.
RastJ.JohnstonJ. M.Ellinger-AllenJ. A.DrumC. (1985). Effects of nutritional and mechanical properties of food on ruminative behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior44, 195–206.
53.
RoseT. L. (1979). Reducing self-injurious behavior by differentially reinforcing other behaviors. The American Association for the Education of the Severely/Profoundly Handicapped4, 179–186.
54.
SingerG. H. S.SingerJ.HornerR. H. (1987). Using pretask requests to increase the probability of compliance for students with severe disabilities. Journal of The Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 12, 287–291.
55.
SobseyD. (1987, November). Non-aversive behavior management: The verdict is in. News & Notes, American Association on Mental Retardation newsletter.
56.
SteenP. L.ZuriffG. E. (1977). The use of relaxation in the treatment of self-injurious behavior. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 18, 447–448.
57.
TouchetteP.McDonaldR.LangerS. (1985). A scatter plot for identifying stimulus control of problem behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 18, 343–351.
58.
UllmanL. P.KrasnerL. (Eds.). (1965). Case studies in behavior modification.New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
59.
Van HoutenR. (1983). Punishment: From the animal laboratory to the applied setting. In AxelrodS.ApscheJ. (Eds.), The effects of punishment on human behavior, (pp. 13–44). New York: Academic Press.
60.
Van HoutenR.AxelrodS.BaileyJ. S.FavellJ. E.FoxxR. M.IwataB. A.LovaasO. I. (1988). The right to effective behavioral treatment. The Behavior Analyst, 11(2), 111–114.
61.
WahlerR. G.FoxJ. J. (1981). Setting events in applied behavior analysis: Toward a conceptual and methodological expansion. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 14, 327–338.
62.
WinterlingV.DunlapG.O'NeillR. (1987). The influence of task variation on the aberrant behavior of autistic students. Education and Treatment of Children, 10, 105–119.
63.
WolfM. M. (1978). Social validity: The case for subjective measurement or how applied behavior analysis is finding its heart. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 203–214.
