BaerD. M.FowlerS. A. (1984). How should we measure the potential of self-control procedures for generalized education outcomes? In HowardW. L.HeronT. E.HillD. S.Trap-PorterJ. (Eds.), Focus on behavior analysis in education (pp. 39–61) Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.
2.
BarlowD. H.HersenM. (1985). Single case experimental designs (2nd ed). New York: Pergamon Press.
3.
CarrE. G.KologinskyE. (1983). Acquisition of sign language by autistic children II: Spontaneity and generalization effects. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis16, 297–314.
4.
FowlerS. A. (1984). Introductory comments: The programmatics of self-management for the developmentally disabled. Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities4, 85–89.
5.
GoetzL.GeeK.SailorW. (1985). Using a behavior chain interruption strategy to teach communication skills to students with severe disabilities. Journal of The Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps10, 21–30.
6.
HalleJ. W. (1982). Teaching functional language to the handicapped: An integrative model of natural environment teaching techniques. Journal of The Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps7, 29–37.
7.
HalleJ. W.BaerD. M.SpradlinJ. (1981). Teachers' generalized use of delay as a stimulus control procedure to increase language use in handicapped children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis14, 389–409.
8.
HalleJ. W.MarshallA. M.SpradlinJ. (1979). Time delay: A technique to increase language use and facilitate generalization in retarded children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis12, 431–439.
9.
HartB. M.RisleyT. R. (1968). Establishing use of descriptive adjectives in the spontaneous speech of disadvantaged preschool children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis1, 109–120.
10.
HartB. M.RisleyT. R. (1975). Incidental teaching of language in the preschool. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis8, 411–420.
11.
HartB. M.RisleyT. R. (1980). In vivo language interventions: Unanticipated general effects. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis13, 407–432.
12.
HartB. M.RisleyT. R. (1982). How to use incidental teaching for elaborating language.Lawrence, KS: H & H Enterprises.
13.
KazdinA. E. (1982). Single case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings.New York: Oxford University Press.
14.
McGeeG. G.KrantzP. J.MasonD.McClannahanL. E. (1983). A modified incidental-teaching procedure for autistic youth: Acquisition and generalization of receptive object labels. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis16, 329–338.
15.
McGeeG. G.KrantzP. J.McClannahanL. E. (1985). The facilitative effects of incidental teaching on preposition use by autistic children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis18, 17–31.
16.
NeefN. A.WaltersJ.EgelA. L. (1984). Establishing generative yes/no responses in developmentally disabled children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis17, 453–460.
17.
PeckC. A. (1985). Increasing opportunities for social control by children with autism and severe handicaps: Effects on student behavior and perceived classroom climate. Journal of The Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps10, 183–193.
18.
PeckC. A.TomlinsonC.SchulerA. C.TheimerR. K.HaringT. (1984). The social competence curriculum project: A guide to instructional programming for social interactions (Contract No. 300-83-0353). Washington, DC: U.S. Office of Special Education.
19.
Rogers-WarrenA.WarrenS. (1980). Mands for verbalization: Facilitating the display of newly trained language in children. Behavior Modification4, 361–382.
20.
SailorW. S.MixJ. (1975). The TARC Assessment System.Lawrence, KS: H & H Enterprises.