Seventy people with mental retardation who had moved from a large state institution to small community living arrangements were matched with 70 people who remained at the same institution. They were matched by sex, level of retardation, years institutionalized, self-care skills, age, and IQ. Developmental growth, operationally defined as adaptive behavior change using a research version of the AAMD Adaptive Behavior Scale, was measured for all people; only those people who had been deinstitutionalized demonstrated significant growth. They also received more services. Subsequently, telephone surveys and other procedures were used to identify the inclusive public costs associated with the two groups. Upon comparison, the deinstitutionalized group required less public money than the institutionalized group, although the financial burden shifted substantially from federal sources to state (and local) funding sources when people moved from the institution to community-based facilities. Correlates of costs in the community were explored in a preliminary way.
ArndtS. (1981). A general measure of adaptive behavior. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 85(5), 554–556.
2.
AshbaughJ.AllardM. A. (1983). Comparative analysis of the costs of residential and day services within institutional and community settings. Boston: Human Services Research Institute.
3.
BakerB.SeltzerG.SeltzerM. (1974). As close as possible. Cambridge, MA: Behavioral Education Projects, Harvard University.
4.
BaumeisterA. (1970). The American residential institution: Its history and character. In BaumeisterA. A.ButterfieldE. C. (Eds.), Residential facilities for the mentally retarded (pp. 1–28). Chicago: Aldine.
5.
BiklenD. (1979). The community imperative: A refutation of all arguments in support of institutionalizing anybody because of mental retardation. Syracuse: Center on Human Policy.
6.
BlattB.BogdanR.BiklenD.TaylorS. (1976). From institution to community: A conversion model. Unpublished manuscript, Syracuse University.
7.
BlumB. (1977). Costs for services for Willowbrook class clients in community placement. New York: Metropolitan Placement Unit, Department of Mental Health.
8.
BradleyV.ConroyJ. (1983). Third year comprehensive report of the Pennhurst Longitudinal Study. Philadelphia: Temple University Developmental Disabilities Center.
9.
CampbellD.StanleyJ. (1966). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago: Rand McNally.
10.
ConleyR. (1973). The economics of mental retardation. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
11.
ConroyJ. (1980). Reliability of the Behavior Development Survey (Tech. Rep. No. 80–1–1). Philadelphia: Temple University Developmental Disabilities Center.
12.
ConroyJ.EfthimiouJ.LemanowiczJ. (1981). Reliability of the Behavior Development Survey: Maladaptive behavior section (Pennhurst Study Brief Report No. 11). Philadelphia: Temple University Developmental Disabilities Center.
13.
ConroyJ.EfthimiouJ.LemanowiczJ. (1982). A matched comparison of the developmental growth of institutional and deinstitutionalized mentally retarded clients. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 86, 581–587.
14.
CookT.CampbellD. (1976). The design and conduct of quasi-experiments and true experiments in field settings. In DunnetteM. (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 223–326). Chicago: Rand McNally.
15.
CronbachL.FurbyL. (1970). How should we measure change - or should we?Psychological Bulletin, 74, 68–80.
16.
DonY.AmirY. (1969). Institutions for mentally retarded in Israel—cost structure and budget analysis. Mental Retardation, 7, 36–39.
17.
HealL.DanielsB. (1978, May). A cost effectiveness analysis of residential alternatives for selected developmentally disabled citizens of the northern Wisconsin counties. A paper presented at the 102nd Annual Meeting of the American Association of Mental Deficiency, Denver, CO.
18.
HealL. W.SigelmanC. K.SwitzkyH. N. (1980). Research on community residential alternatives for the mentally retarded. In FlynnR. J.NitschK. E. (Eds.), Normalization, Social Integration, and Community Services (pp. 215–258). Baltimore: University Park Press.
19.
Indiana Department of Mental Health, Division of Mental Retardation. (1975). Progress report on alternate residential facilities in ten agencies operating pilot projects. Indiana Legislative Council.
20.
IntagliataJ.WilierB.CooleyF. (1979). Cost comparison of institutional and community based alternatives for mentally retarded persons. Mental Retardation, 17, 154–156.
21.
IsettR.SpreatS. (1979). Test-retest and interrater reliability of the AAMD Adaptive Behavior Scale. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 84, 93–95.
22.
JonesK.JonesP. (1976). The measurement of community placement success and its associated costs (Interim Report 2). Medford, MA: Brandeis University, Florence Heller School for Advanced Studies in Social Welfare.
23.
KrantzG.BruininksR.ClumpnerJ. (1978). Mentally retarded people in state-operated residential facilities: Year ending June 30, 1978. Minneapolis: Department of Psychoeducational Studies, University of Minnesota.
24.
LatibA.ConroyJ.HessC. (1984). Family attitudes toward deinstitutionalization. In EllisN.BrayN. (Eds.), International review of research in mental retardation (Vol. 12, pp. 67–93). Orlando: Academic Press.
25.
MayedaT.WaiF. (1975) The cost of long term developmental disabilities care. Pomona, CA: University of California, Los Angeles, Neuropsychiatric Institute.
26.
Minnesota Developmental Disabilities Planning. (1982). Cost function analysis of Minnesota ICF/MR per diems (Policy Analysis Paper #4). St. Paul: Developmental Disabilities Planning.
27.
MurphyJ.DatelW. (1976). A cost benefit analysis of community versus institutional living. Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 27(3), 165–170.
28.
National Association of State Mental Retardation Program Directors, Inc. (1980). Trends in capital expenditures for mental retardation facilities: A state-by-state survey. Arlington, VA: National Association of State Mental Retardation Program Directors, Inc.
29.
NihiraL. (1979). Costs for care of matched developmentally disabled clients in three settings. Pomona, CA: University of California, Los Angeles, Neuropsychiatric Institute Research Group at Lanterman State Hospital.
30.
O'ConnorG. (1976). Home is a good place: A national perspective of community residential facilities for developmentally disabled persons (Monograph No. 2). Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Deficiency.
31.
O'ConnorG.MorrisL. (1978). A research approach to cost analysis and program budgeting of community residential facilities. Eugene, OR: Rehabilitation Research and Training Center in Mental Retardation.
32.
Peat, Marwick, Mitchell, & Co. (1976). The financial requirements of normalized residential services and facilities for persons with developmental disabilities. Chicago: Illinois Advisory Council on Developmental Disabilities.
33.
PrimroseD. (1972). Differential costs in care in a mental deficiency hospital in Scotland. British Journal of Psychiatry, 12(565), 623–626.
34.
ScheerenbergerR. C. (1978). Public residential services for the mentally retarded in 1977. Madison, WI: Central Wisconsin Center for the Developmentally Disabled.
35.
ScheerenbergerR. C. (1979). Public residential services for the mentally retarded in 1978. Madison, WI: Central Wisconsin Center for the Developmentally Disabled.
36.
SorensenJ. E.GroveH. D. (1978). Using cost-outcome and cost-effectiveness analysis for improved program management and accountability. In AttkissonC.HargreavesW.HorowitzM.SorensenJ. (Eds.), Evaluation of human services programs (pp. 371–408). New York: Academic Press.
37.
TemplemanD.GageM. A.FredericksH. D. (1982). Cost effectiveness of the group home. Journal of the Association for the Severely Handicapped, 6(4), 11–16.
38.
WalshJ. (1982). The development of residential services in the 80s and beyond: The private sector perspective. Training Quarterly on Developmental Disabilities. Philadelphia: Temple University Woodhaven Center and Developmental Disabilities Center.
39.
WieckC. A.BruininksR. H. (1980). The cost of public and community residential care for mentally retarded people in the United States. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychoeducational Studies.
40.
WolfensbergerW. (1972). The principle of normalization in human services. Toronto: National Institute on Mental Retardation.
