Crossmodal transfer of stimulus control procedures was used to establish reliable responding to an auditory cue in three severely multiply handicapped students who had previously failed to demonstrate reliable responses to stimuli presented in the auditory mode. As a result, all three students were able to participate in formal audiometric evaluations of their hearing status. Procedures were designed to be replicable in a typical classroom setting serving severely handicapped students. Results are discussed in terms of their utility in facilitating audiological testing for untestable persons and in terms of implications for teaching students functional use of the auditory sensory channel.
CoxP.LloydL. L.Audiologic considerations. In LloydL. L. (Ed.), Communication assessment and intervention strategies. Baltimore: University Park Press, 1976.
2.
FultonR. F. (Ed.). Auditory stimulus response control. Baltimore: University Park Press, 1975.
3.
FultonR.LloydL.Auditory assessment of the difficult-to-test. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1969.
4.
GoetzL.BaldwinM.GeeK.SailorW.Classroom-based sensory assessment procedures for severely handicapped students: Case studies of a stimulus transfer paradigm. Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 1982, 2, 171–185(a).
5.
GoetzL.UtleyB.GeeK.BaldwinM.SailorW.Auditory assessment and programming manual for severely handicapped and deaf-blind students. Seattle, WA: The Association for the Severely Handicapped, 1982(b).
LovaasO. I.SchreibmanL.KoegelR.RehmR.Selective responding by autistic children to multiple sensory input. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1971, 77, 211–222.
8.
SchreibmanL.Effects of within-stimulus and extra-stimulus prompting on discrimination learning in autistic children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1975, 8, 91–112.
9.
SidmanM.CressonO.Reading and crossmodal transfer of stimulus equivalences in severe retardation. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1973, 77, 515–523.
10.
SidmanM.StoddardL.The effectiveness of fading in programming a simultaneous form discrimination for retarded children. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1967, 10, 3–15.
11.
SnellM.GastD.Applying time delay procedure to the instruction of the severely handicapped. Journal of the Association for the Severely Handicapped, 1981, 6, 3–13.
12.
StoddardL. T.SidmanM.The effects of errors on children's performance on a circle-ellipse discrimination. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1967, 10, 261–270.
13.
StriefelS.BryanK.AikensD.Transfer of stimulus control from motor to verbal stimuli. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1974, 7, 123–135.
14.
StriefelS.WetherbyB.KarlanG.Developing generalized instruction following behavior in severely retarded people. American Journal of Mental Deficiency Monograph #3, 1978, 267–325.
15.
SuzukiT.OgibaY.Conditioned orientation reflex audiometry. Archives of Otolaryngology, 1961, 74, 84–90.
16.
TerraceH. S.Discrimination learning with and without errors. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1963, 6, 1–27(a).
17.
TerraceH. S.Errorless transfer of a discrimination across two continua. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1963, 6, 223–232(b).
18.
TouchetteP.Transfer of stimulus control: Measuring the moment of transfer. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1971, 15, 347–354.
19.
WolfeV.CuvoA.Effects of within-stimulus and extra-stimulus prompting on letter discrimination by mentally retarded persons. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1978, 83, 297–303.
