Principles, processes, and information that can be used in selecting an initial lexicon are discussed. Two strategies for lexicon selection, one based upon functional-remedial logic and the other upon developmental considerations, are presented together with guidelines for selecting lexical items derived from each. Data from validation studies undertaken to determine the usefulness of a sample lexicon for elementary- and adolescent/adult-aged severely handicapped individuals are examined. An example of a lexicon for adolescent/adult-aged individuals resulting from the validation studies is also presented. Finally, the compatability of the two lexicon selection strategies is discussed.
BloomL.One word at a time: The use of single-word utterances before syntax. The Hague: Mouton, 1973.
2.
CarlsonF.A format for selecting vocabulary for the nonspeaking child. Language, Speech and Hearing Services in the Schools, 1981, 12, 240–245.
3.
FristoeM.LloydL. L.Planning an initial expressive sign lexicon for persons with severe communication impairment. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 1980, 45, 170–180.
4.
FristoeM.LloydL. L.Signs used in manual communication training with persons having severe communication impairment. AAESPH Review, 1979, 4, 364–373.
5.
GuessD.SailorW.BaerD. M.To teach language to retarded children. In SchielfelbuschR. L.LloydL. L. (Eds.), Language perspectives: Acquisition, retardation, and intervention. Baltimore: University Park Press, 1974.
6.
GuessD.SailorW.BaerD. M.A behavioral-remedial approach to language training for the severely handicapped. In SontagE.SmithJ.CertoN. (Eds.), Educational programming for the severely and profoundly handicapped. Reston, VA: Division on Mental Retardation, Council for Exceptional Children, 1977.
7.
Hamre-NietupskiS.FullertonP.HoltzK.Ryan-FlottumM.StollA.BrownL.Curricular strategies for teaching selected nonverbal communication skills to nonverbal and severely handicapped students. In BrownL.NietupskiJ.LyonS.Hamre-NietupskiS.BrownerT.GruenewaldL. (Eds.), Curricular strategies for teaching functional object use, nonverbal communication, problem solving and mealtime skills to severely handicapped students (Vol. 7, Part 1). Madison, WI: Madison Metropolitan School District, 1977.
8.
HollandA.Language therapy for children: Some thoughts on context and content. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 1975, 40, 514–523.
9.
KarlanG. R.The effects of preference for objects and repeated measures upon the assessed level of object permanence and means/ends ability in severely handicapped students. Journal of the Association for the Severely Handicapped, 1980, 5, 174–193.
10.
KazdinA. E.Assessing the clinical or applied importance of behavior change through social validation. Behavior Modification, 1977, 1, 427–451.
11.
LaheyM.BloomL.Planning a first lexicon: Which words to teach first. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 1977, 42, 340–349.
12.
NelsonK.Structure and strategy in learning to talk. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 1973, 38(1–2, Serial No. 149).
13.
NietupskiJ.Hamre-NietupskiS.Teaching auxiliary communication skills to severely handicapped students. AAESPH Review, 1979, 4, 107–124.
14.
ReichleJ.WilliamsW.RyanS.Selecting signs for the formulation of an augmentative communicative modality. Journal of the Association for the Severely Handicapped, 1981, 6, 48–56.
15.
WolfM. M.Social validity: The case for subjective measurement, or how applied behavior analysis is finding its heart. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1978, 11, 203–214.
