Examining the Quality of Individualized Education Programs for Students with Autism Spectrum Disorder and Intellectual Disability in Turkey

Abstract

The Individualized Education Program (IEP) is a foundational tool for supporting the educational, social, and developmental progress of students with disabilities. Using a relational quantitative research design, this study examined the quality of 487 IEPs developed for students with autism spectrum disorder (ASD; n = 214) and intellectual disability (ID; n = 273) in Turkey. IEPs were sourced from 193 teachers across 19 special and general education schools. A total of 487 IEPs were analyzed using the Individualized Education Program Quality Assessment Scale. Descriptive and inferential analyses were conducted to determine differences based on student and teacher characteristics. Results indicated that the overall quality of IEPs was moderately low. Significant relationships were found between IEP quality and both student age and teacher age, although these associations were small in magnitude. IEPs developed for students with ASD were of higher quality than those for students with ID, and quality declined as the severity of disability increased. IEPs written by certified teachers were rated higher in quality than those written by special education program graduates. These findings highlight the need to strengthen teacher preparation and professional development programs to ensure that educators are equipped with both specialized and developmental knowledge to create high-quality, individualized plans.

Keywords

Individualized Education Program quality autism spectrum disorder intellectual disability teacher preparation and professional development inclusive education in Turkey

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Agran

Jackson

Kurth

J. A.

Ryndak

Burnette

Jameson

Zagona

Fitzpatrick

Wehmeyer

(2020). Why aren’t students with severe disabilities being placed in general education classrooms: Examining the relations among classroom placement, learner outcomes, and other factors. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 45(1), 4–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1540796919878134

Alan

Ş.

Aksoy

. (2023). Quality of individualized education programs (IEP) developed in special education schools. Ondokuz Mayıs University Journal of Faculty of Education, 42(1), 161–194. https://doi.org/10.7822/omuefd.1216755

American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities. (2010). Intellectual disability: Definition, classification, and systems of supports (11th ed.). https://www.aaidd.org/intellectual-disability/definition

American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596

Berk

Açar

(2024). Özel eğitim ve rehabilitasyon merkezlerindeki öğrenciler için hazırlanan bireyselleştirilmiş eğitim programlarının kalitelerinin incelenmesi [An investigation of the quality of individualized education programs prepared for students in special education and rehabilitation centers]. Buca Faculty of Education Journal, 62, 2809–2825. https://doi.org/10.53444/deubefd.1457849

Boavida

Aguiar

McWilliam

R. A.

Pimentel

J. S.

(2010). Quality of individualized education program goals of preschoolers with disabilities. Infants & Young Children, 23(3), 233–243. https://doi.org/10.1097/IYC.0b013e3181e45925

Brownell

M. T.

Sindelar

P. T.

Kiely

M. T.

Danielson

L. C.

(2010). Special education teacher quality and preparation: Exposing foundations, constructing a new model. Exceptional Children, 76(3), 357–377. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440291007600307

Cohen

(1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Darling-Hammond

(2000). Teacher quality and student achievement. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(1), 1–44. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v8n1.2000

10.

Decree Law No. 573 on Special Education [Özel Eğitim Hakkında Kanun Hükmünde Kararname]. (1997, June 6). T. C. Resmî Gazete (Issue: 23011). https://www.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2012_10/11015632_ozel_egitim_khk.pdf

11.

Deris

Murzyn

Hensley

(2023). Creating an IEP: The components and process. In Toscano

Toland

Gilpin

(Eds.), Design of Individualized Education Programs (IEPs). Pressbook. https://minnstate.pressbooks.pub/ieps/

12.

Education Act 1981, c. 60 (UK). https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1981/60/enacted

13.

Education for All Handicapped Children Act of 1975, 20 U.S.C. § 1401 (1975). https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/STATUTE-89/pdf/STATUTE-89-Pg773.pdf

14.

Findley

J. A.

Ruble

L. A.

McGrew

J. H.

(2022). Individualized education program quality for transition age students with autism. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 91, 101900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2021.101900

15.

Forlin

Chambers

(2011). Teacher preparation for inclusive education: Increasing knowledge but raising concerns. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 39(1), 17–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2010.540850

16.

Fraenkel

J. R.

Wallen

N. E.

Hyun

H. H.

(2012). How to design and evaluate research in education (8th ed.). McGraw-Hill.

17.

George

Mallery

(2010). SPSS for windows step by step: A simple guide and reference, 17.0 update (10th ed.). Pearson.

18.

Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 (2004). https://sites.ed.gov/idea

19.

Karal

M. A.

Wolfe

P. S.

(2018). In-service training for special education teachers working with students having developmental disabilities to develop effective transition goals. International Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 66(2), 133–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/20473869.2018.1518809

20.

Kurth

J. A.

Lockman Turner

Gerasimova

Hicks

T. A.

Zagona

Lansey

Mansouri

M. C.

Jameson

Loyless

(2025). Quality of IEPs for students with complex support needs: Is there alignment across IEP components? Exceptionality, 33(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/09362835.2024.2389079

21.

Kurth

J. A.

Lockman Turner

Gerasimova

Hicks

T. A.

Zagona

Lansey

Mansouri

M. C.

Lyon

K. J.

Jameson

Loyless

Pace

J. R.

(2022). An investigation of IEP quality associated with special education placement for students with complex support needs. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 47(4), 244–260. https://doi.org/10.1177/15407969221134923

22.

La Salle

T. P.

Roach

A. T.

McGrath

. (2013). The relationship of IEP quality to curricular access and academic achievement for students with disabilities. International Journal of Special Education, 28(1), 135–144.

23.

McLeskey

Billingsley

B. S.

(2008). How does the quality and stability of the teaching force influence the research-to-practice gap? A perspective on the teacher shortage in special education. Remedial and Special Education, 29(5), 293–305. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932507312010

24.

Ministry of National Education [Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı]. (2022, August 4). Regulation on special education services [Özel eğitim hizmetleri yönetmeliği]. T.C. Resmî Gazete (Issue: 31913). https://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2022/08/20220804-2.htm

25.

Pretti-Frontczak

Bricker

(2000). Enhancing the quality of individualized education plan (IEP) goals and objectives. The Journal of Early Intervention, 23(2), 92–105. https://doi.org/10.1177/105381510002300204

26.

Rakap

(2015). Quality of individualized education programme goals and objectives for preschool children with disabilities. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 30(2), 173–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2014.986909

27.

Rakap

Yucesoy-Ozkan

Kalkan

(2019). How complete are individualized education programmes developed for students with disabilities served in inclusive classroom settings? European Journal of Special Needs Education, 34(5), 663–677. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2019.1580840

28.

Rossetti

Sauer

J. S.

Bui

(2017). Developing collaborative partnerships with culturally and linguistically diverse families during the IEP process. Teaching Exceptional Children, 49(5), 328–338. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059916680103

29.

Ruble

L. A.

McGrew

Dalrymple

Jung

L. A.

(2010). Examining the quality of IEPs for young children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 40(12), 1459–1470. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-010-1003-1

30.

Ruppar

A. L.

Neeper

L. S.

Dalsen

(2016). Special education teachers’ perceptions of preparedness to teach students with severe disabilities. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 41(4), 273–286. https://doi.org/10.1177/1540796916672843

31.

Sanches-Ferreira

Lopes-dos-Santos

Alves

Santos

Silveira-Maia

(2013). How individualised are the individualised education programmes (IEPs): An analysis of the contents and quality of the IEPs goals. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 28(4), 507–520. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2013.830435

32.

Sari

R. K.

(2016). A new challenge for special education teacher training in Turkey: The newest and applied master’s degree program’s effects. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(35), 1–8.

33.

Viera

A. J.

Garrett

J. M.

(2005). Understanding interobserver agreement: The kappa statistic. Family Medicine, 37(5), 360–363.

34.

Wong

V. W.

Ruble

L. A.

McGrew

J. H.

(2017). Too stressed to teach? Teaching quality, student engagement, and IEP outcomes. Exceptional Children, 83(4), 456–471. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402917690729