CunninghamE. M.O’NeillR. E. (2007). Agreement of functional behavioral assessment and analysis methods with students with EBD. Behavioral Disorders, 32(3), 211–221. https://doi.org/10.1177/019874290703200305
2.
HornerR. H.DunlapG.KoegelR. L.CarrE. G.SailorW.AndersonJ.AlbinR. W.O’NeillR. E. (1990). Toward a technology of “nonaversive” behavioral support. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 15(3), 125–132. https://doi.org/10.1177/154079699001500301
3.
HuntP.McDonnellJ.CrockettM. A. (2012). Reconciling an ecological curricular framework focusing on quality of life outcomes with the development and instruction of standards-based academic goals. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 37(3), 139–152. https://doi.org/10.2511/027494812804153471
4.
JacksonL.AgranM.LanseyK. R.BakerD.MatthewsS.FitzpatrickH.JamesonM.RyndakD.BurnetteK.TaubD. (2022). Examination of contextual variables across and within different types of placement for elementary students with complex support needs. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 47(4), 191–208. https://doi.org/10.1177/15407969221132248
5.
McDonnellJ.JamesonJ. M.BowmanJ. A.ColemanO.RyanJ.EichelbergerC.ConradiL. (2020). Assessing generalization in single-case research studies teaching core academic content to students with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 35(3), 143–152. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088357620902500
6.
SpoonerF.BrowderD. M. (2015). Raising the bar: Significant advances and future needs for promoting learning for students with severe disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 36(1), 28–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932514555022