Restricted accessReview articleFirst published online 2025-6
Access for Students with Extensive Support Needs to State-Adopted Grade-Level Standards and Curriculum in General Education Classes: A Content Analysis of the Literature
In this article, we provide a summary of a literature review conducted to determine how the published literature, including research articles, conceptual articles, and chapters, (a) describes access to the state-adopted grade-level standards in general education classes for students with extensive support needs (ESN) and (b) discusses recommended processes for determining meaningful access to the state-adopted grade-level standards in general education classes for students with ESN. We reviewed a total of 554 pieces of published literature considered for inclusion in our summary. Based on our inclusion and exclusion criteria, we included 32 articles and chapters in the final analysis. The review yielded important information related to six themes, including (a) the language used to describe students with ESN; (b) the varying understandings, or perceptions, of what access to the state-adopted grade-level standards means; (c) the recommended steps in the processes that teams might use to provide access to the state-adopted grade-level standards, and the alignment between standards and Individualized Education Program goals; (d) the short- and long-term outcomes of access to and inclusion in the general education curriculum; (e) who is involved; and (f) the ways in which progress monitoring and assessment were implemented. We conclude with our recommendations for future research.
*AgranM.CavinM.WehmeyerM.PalmerS. (2006). Participation of students with moderate to severe disabilities in the general curriculum: The effects of the self-determined model of instruction. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 31(3), 230–241. https://doi.org/10.1177/1540796900603100303
2.
AgranM.JacksonL.KurthJ.RyndakD. L.BurnetteK.JamesonM.ZagonaA.FitzpatrickH.WehmeyerM. (2020). Why aren’t students with severe disabilities being placed in general education classrooms: Examining the relations among classroom placement, learner outcomes, and other factors. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 45(1), 4–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1540796919878134
3.
*Ahlgrim-DelzellL.MimsP. J.VintinnerJ. (2014). Reading for students who are nonverbal. In BrowderD. M.SpoonerF. (Eds.), More language arts, math, and science for students with severe disabilities (pp. 85–108). Paul H. Brookes.
4.
AyresK. M.LowreyK. A.DouglasK. H.SieversC. (2011). I can identify Saturn but I can’t brush my teeth: What happens when the curricular focus for students with severe disabilities shifts. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 46(1), 11–21.
5.
BaglieriS. (2017). Disability studies and the inclusive classroom: Critical practices for embracing diversity in education (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315642543
6.
BrantlingerE.JimenezR.KlingnerJ.PugachM.RichardsonV. (2005). Qualitative studies in special education. Exceptional Children, 71(2), 195–207. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290507100205
7.
BrowderD. M.SpoonerF. (2014). More language arts, math, and science for students with severe disabilities. Paul H. Brookes.
8.
*BrowderD. M.SpoonerF.WakemanS.TrelaK.BakerJ. N. (2006). Aligning instruction with academic content standards: Finding the link. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 31(4), 309–321. https://doi.org/10.1177/154079690603100404
9.
BrownF.McDonnellJ.SnellM. E. (2020). Instruction of students with severe disabilities. Pearson.
10.
*ClaytonJ.BurdgeM.DenhamA.KleinertH. L.KearnsJ. (2006). A four-step process for accessing the general curriculum for students with significant cognitive disabilities. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 38(5), 20–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/004005990603800503
11.
CollinsB. C. (2022). Systematic instruction for students with moderate and severe disabilities (2nd ed.). Paul H. Brookes.
12.
CopelandS. R.KeefeE. B. (2018). Effective literacy instruction for learners with complex support needs (2nd ed.). Paul H. Brookes.
13.
*CopelandS. R.McDonnellJ. (2020). Teaching academic skills. In BrownF.McDonnellJ.SnellM. (Eds.), Instruction of students with severe disabilities: Meeting the needs of children and youth with intellectual disabilities, multiple disabilities, and autism spectrum disorders (9th ed., pp. 452–489). Pearson.
14.
*CushingL. S.ClarkN. M.CarterE. W.KennedyC. H. (2005). Access to the general education curriculum for students with significant cognitive disabilities. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 38(2), 6–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/004005990503800201
15.
*DowningJ. E. (2010). Academic instruction for students with moderate and severe intellectual disabilities in inclusive classrooms. Sage.
16.
*DowningJ. E.DemchakM. (2008). First steps: Determining individual abilities and how best to support students. In DowningJ. E. (Ed.), Including students with severe and multiple disabilities in typical classrooms: Practical strategies for teachers (3rd ed., pp. 49–90). Paul H. Brookes.
17.
DukesC.DarlingS. M. (2017). Common core state standards and students with severe disabilities: An introduction to the special issue. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 42(3), 139–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/1540796917715408
18.
*DymondS.RenzagliaA.RosensteinA.ChunE. J.BanksR. A.NiswanderV.GilsonC. L. (2006). Using anticipatory action research approach to create a universally designed inclusive high school science course: A case study. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 31(4), 293–308. https://doi.org/10.1177/154079690603100403
*FisherD.FreyN. (2001). Access to the core curriculum: Critical ingredients for student success. Remedial and Special Education, 22(3), 148–157. https://doi.org/10.1177/074193250102200303
22.
FisherD. L.RyndakD. (2001). The foundations of inclusive education: A compendium of articles on effective strategies to achieve inclusive education (2nd ed.). TASH.
23.
*GeeK. (2017). Designing curriculum & adaptations. In OreloveF.SobseyD.GillesD. (Eds.), Educating children with multiple disabilities (5th ed. pp. 307–350). Paul H. Brookes.
GeeK.GonzalezM.CooperC. (2020). Outcomes of inclusive versus separate placements: A matched pairs comparison study. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 45(4), 223–240. https://doi.org/10.1177/1540796920943469
26.
GeeK.RyndakD.FisherM.WalkerV. (2024). Access to the general education curriculum for students with extensive support needs: Experts’ perspectives. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 49(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/15407969231219027
27.
HseihH.-F.ShannonS. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
28.
*HuntP.McDonnellJ.CrockettM. A. (2012). Reconciling and ecological curricular framework focusing on quality of life outcomes with the development and instruction of standards-based academic goals. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 37(3), 139–152. https://doi.org/10.2511/027494812804153471
JacksonL.AgranM.LanseyK. R.BakerD.MatthewsS.FitzpatrickH.JamesonM.RyndakD.BurnetteK.TaubD. (2022). Examination of contextual variables across and within different types of placement for elementary students with complex support needs. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 47(4), 191–208. https://doi.org/10.1177/15407969221132248
31.
JacksonL.RyndakD. L.BillingsleyF. (2000). Useful practices in inclusive education: A preliminary view of what experts in moderate and severe disabilities are saying. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 25(3), 129–141. https://doi.org/10.2511/rpsd.25.3.129
32.
JacksonL.RyndakD. L.WehmeyerM. L. (2008). The dynamic relationship between context, curriculum, and student learning: A case for inclusive education as a research-based practice. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 34(1), 175–195. https://doi.org/10.2511/rpsd.33.4.175
33.
*JimenezB.CarloneH. (2014). Science as inquiry. In BrowderD. M.SpoonerF. (Eds.), More language arts, math, and science for students with severe disabilities (pp. 195–214). Paul H Brookes.
34.
*JimenezB.CourtadeG.BrowderD. M. (2016). Six successful strategies for teaching to state standards for students with moderate to severe disabilities. Attainment.
35.
JohnsonJ. W.McDonnellJ.HolzwarthV. N.HunterK. (2004). The efficacy of embedded instruction for students with developmental disabilities enrolled in general education classes. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 6(4), 214–227. https://doi.org/10.1177/10983007040060040301
36.
*JorgensenC. (2018a). Construct learning and communicative competence. In JorgensenC. (Ed.), It’s more than “just being in”: Creating authentic inclusion for students with complex support needs (pp. 39–56). Paul H. Brookes.
37.
*JorgensenC. (2018b). Write an inclusive, standards-based individualized education program. In JorgensenC. (Ed.), It’s more than “just being in”: Creating authentic inclusion for students with complex support needs (pp. 57–78). Paul H. Brookes.
38.
*JorgensenC.FisherD.RoachV. (1997). Curriculum and its impact on inclusion and the achievement of students with disabilities. Consortium on Inclusive Schooling Practices, 2(2), 2–21.
39.
KnightV. F.WoodA. L.McKissickB. R.KuntzE. M. (2020). Teaching science content and practices to students with intellectual disability and autism. Remedial and Special Education, 41(6), 327–340. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932519843998
40.
KuntzE. M.CarterW. E. (2021). Effects of a collaborative planning and consultation framework to increase participation of students with severe disabilities in general education classes. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 46(1), 35–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/1540796921992518
41.
KurthJ. A.TurnerE. L.GerasimovaD.HicksT. A.ZagonaA.LanseyK.MansouriM. C.LyonK. J.JamesonM.LoylessR.PaceJ. R. (2022). An investigation of IEP quality associated with special education placement for students with complex support needs. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 47(4), 244–260. https://doi.org/10.1177/15407969221134923
42.
LanseyK. R.BurnetteK. K.RyndakD. L. (2023). Disrupting the system: How social systems perpetuate the educational segregation of students with extensive support needs. International Journal on Special Education, 38(1), 58–68. https://doi.org/10.52291/ijse.2023.38.6
43.
MansouriM. C.KurthJ. A.Lockman TurnerE.ZimmermanK. N.FrickT. A. (2022). Comparison of academic and social outcomes of students with extensive support needs across placements. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 47(2), 111–129. https://doi.org/10.1177/15407969221101792
44.
*McDonnellJ.HuntP. (2014). Inclusive education and meaningful school outcomes. In AgranM.BrownF.HughesC.QuirkC.RyndakD. (Eds.), Equity and full participation for individuals with severe disabilities: A vision for the future (pp. 155–176). Paul H. Brookes.
45.
*McDonnellJ.JamesonM. J.ReisenT.PolychronusP. (2014). Embedded instruction in inclusive settings. In BrowderD. M.SpoonerF. (Eds.), More language arts, math, and science for students with significant cognitive disabilities (pp. 15–36). Paul H. Brookes.
46.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M.SaldañaJ. (2020). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (4th ed.). Sage.
47.
National Governors Association Center for Best Practices. (2010). Common Core State Standards. Council of Chief State School Officers.
48.
NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. The National Academies Press.
49.
*OlsonA.LekoM. M.RobertsC. A. (2016). Providing students with severe disabilities access to the general education curriculum. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 4(3), 143–157. https://doi.org/10.1177/150796916651975
50.
*OlsonA.RupparA. L. (2017). Resolving barriers to access to the general curriculum: Lessons from an exemplary inclusive district. Inclusion, 5(2), 121–135. https://doi.org/10.1352/2326-6988-5.2.121
51.
*PorterJ.GeeK. (2018). A collaborative process for preparing preservice general education and special education science teachers. In KoomenM. H.KahnS.AtchisonC. A.WildT. A. (Eds.), Toward inclusion of all learners through science teacher education (pp. 339–352). Brill.
52.
RodgersD. B.LoveallS. J. (2022). Writing interventions for students with intellectual and developmental disabilities: A meta-analysis. Remedial and Special Education, 44(3), 239–252. https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325221108896
RyanJ. H.JamesonJ. M.ColemanO. F.EichelbergerC.BowmanJ. A.ConradiL. A.JohnstonS. S.McDonnellJ. (2019). Inclusive social studies content instruction for students with significant intellectual disability using structured inquiry-based instruction. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 54(4), 420–436.
55.
RyndakD. L.AlperS. (2003). Curriculum and instruction for students with significant disabilities in inclusive settings (2nd ed.). Allyn & Bacon.
56.
RyndakD. L.BillingsleyF. (2004). Access to the general education curriculum. In KennedyC. H.HornE. (Eds.), Including students with significant disabilities (pp. 33–53). Allyn & Bacon.
57.
RyndakD. L.JacksonL.BillingsleyF. (2007). Defining school inclusion for students with disabilities: A study of what experts say. Exceptionality, 8(2), 101–116. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327035EX0802_2
58.
*RyndakD. L.JacksonL. B.WhiteJ. M. (2013). Involvement and progress in the general curriculum for students with extensive support needs: K-12 inclusive-education research and implications for the future. Inclusion, 1(1), 28–49. https://doi.org/10.1352/2326-6988-1.1.028
59.
RyndakD. L.MorrisonA. P.SommersteinL. (1999). Literacy prior to and after inclusion in general education settings: A case study. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 24(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.2511/rpsd.24.1.5
60.
*RyndakD. L.OrlandoA.BurnetteK. K. (2020). Creating and implementing inclusive education. In BrownF.McDonnellJ.SnellM. (Eds.), Instruction of students with severe disabilities: Meeting the needs of children and youth with intellectual disabilities, multiple disabilities, and autism spectrum disorders (9th ed., pp. 207–231). Pearson.
61.
SaldañaJ. (2021). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (4th ed.). Sage.
62.
*SaundersA. F.RootJ. R.JimenezB. A. (2019). Recommendations for inclusive educational practices in mathematics for students with extensive support needs. Inclusion, 7(2), 75–91. https://doi.org/10.1352/2326-6988-7.2.75
63.
*SmithT. (2011). Individualizing the general education curriculum. In SmithT. (Ed.), Making inclusion work for students with autism spectrum disorders: An evidence-based guide (pp. 166–188). Guilford.
64.
SpoonerF.RootJ. R.SaundersA. F.BrowderD. M. (2019). An updated evidence-based practice review on teaching mathematics to students with moderate and severe developmental disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 40(3), 150–165. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932517751055
65.
TaubD.ApgarJ.FosterM.RyndakD. L.BurdgeM.LetsonS. (2020). Investigating the alignment between English language arts curricula developed for students with significant intellectual disabilities and the CCSS. Remedial and Special Education, 41(5), 284–295. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932519843184
66.
*TaubD.McCordJ.RyndakD. (2017). Opportunities to learn for students with extensive support needs: A context of evidence-based practices for all in general education classes. Journal of Special Education, 51(3), 127–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466917696263
67.
*ThompsonJ. L.BethuneK. S.WoodC. L.PugaleeD. K. (2014). Teaching grade-aligned math skills. In BrowderD. M.SpoonerF. (Eds.), More language arts, math, and science for students with severe disabilities (pp. 169–194). Paul H. Brookes.
ValleJ. W.ConnorD. J. (2019). Rethinking disability: A disability studies approach to inclusive practices (2nd ed.). Routledge.
70.
Veritas Health Innovation. (n. d.). Covidence systematic review software. www.covidence.org
71.
*WehmeyerM. L.LanceG. D.BashinskiS. (2002). Promoting access to the general curriculum for students with mental retardation: A multi-level model. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 37(3), 233–234.
72.
*WehmeyerM. L.LattinD.AgranM. (2001). Achieving access to the general education curriculum for students with mental retardation: A curriculum decision-making model. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 36(4), 327–342.
73.
*WoodL.BrowderD. M.MrazM. (2014). Passage comprehension and read-alouds. In BrowderD. M.SpoonerF. (Eds.), More language arts, math, and science for students with severe disabilities (pp. 169–194). Paul H. Brookes.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
