Intervening to enhance self-determination has been linked to enhanced in-school outcomes (e.g., academic and transition goal attainment and access to general education) and post-school outcomes (e.g., competitive employment, community participation) for students with and without disabilities in inclusive schools. However, research is needed to examine the extent to which students with extensive support needs (ESN) are included in this body of research. This systematic review aims to identify empirical research articles that examined the outcomes of interventions designed to promote abilities and skills associated with self-determination for students with ESN. Results suggest that research on self-determination for students with ESN in school contexts is limited across grade levels, particularly in inclusive settings. Consequently, there is a need for ongoing research to consider effective self-determination assessments to inform the design and implementation of interventions that promote self-determination for students with ESN in inclusive settings. Implications for research and practice are discussed.
*AgranM.WehmeyerM.CavinM.PalmerS. (2010). Promoting active engagement in the general education classroom and access to the general education curriculum for students with cognitive disabilities. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 45(2), 163–174. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23879804
2.
AlgozzineB.BrowderD.KarvonenM.TestD. W.WoodW. M. (2001). Effects of interventions to promote self-determination for individuals with disabilities. Review of Educational Research, 71(2), 219–277. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543071002219
3.
*BartholomewA.TestD. W.CookeN. L.Cease-CookJ. (2015). Effects of teaching self-determination skills using the common core state standards. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 50(4), 433–445. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26420352
4.
BurkeK. M.RaleyS. K.ShogrenK. A.HagiwaraM.Mumbardó-AdamC.UyanikH.BehrensS. (2020). A meta-analysis of interventions to promote self-determination for students with disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 41(3), 176–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932518802274
5.
BurkeK. M.ShogrenK. A.AntoshA. A.LaPlanteT.MastersonL. H. (2020). Implementing the SDLMI with students with significant support needs during transition planning. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 43(2), 115–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143419887858
6.
CobbB.LehmannJ.Newman-GoncharR.AlwellM. (2009). Self-determination for students with disabilities: A narrative metasynthesis. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 32(2), 108–114. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885728809336654
7.
*CookA. L.WilczenskiF. L.VanderbergL. (2017). Inclusive concurrent enrollment: A promising postsecondary transition practice for building self-determination among students with intellectual disability. Journal of the American Academy of Special Education Professionals, 25–44. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1129638.pdf
8.
CreswellJ. W.CreswellJ. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE.
9.
FixsenD. L.BlaséK. A.DudaM. A.NaoomS. F.Van DykeM. (2010). Implementation of evidence-based treatments for children and adolescents: Research findings and their implications for the future. In WeiszJ. R.KazdinA. E. (Eds.), Evidence-based psychotherapies for children and adolescents (pp. 435–450). The Guilford Press.
10.
GrissomJ. A.KernE. C.RodriguezL. A. (2015). The “representative bureaucracy” in education: Educator workforce diversity, policy outputs, and outcomes for disadvantaged students. Educational Researcher, 44(3), 185–192. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X15580102
11.
HalpernA. S.HerrC. M.DorenB.WolfN. K. (2000). NEXT S.T.E.P.: Student transition and educational planning. ProEd.
12.
HughesC.CosgriffJ. C.AgranM.WashingtonB. H. (2013). Student self-determination: A preliminary investigation of the role of participation in inclusive settings. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 48(1), 3–17. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23879882
13.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1414 et seq. (2004).
14.
KennedyC. H.HornE. M. (2004). Including students with severe disabilities. Pearson/Allyn and Bacon.
15.
KurthJ. A.BornK.LoveH. (2016). Ecobehavioral characteristics of self-contained high school classrooms for students with severe cognitive disability. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 41(4), 227–243. https://doi.org/10.1177/1540796916661492
16.
KurthJ. A.MastergeorgeA. M.PaschallK. (2016). Economic and demographic factors impacting placement of students with autism. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 51(1), 3–12. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26420360
17.
LedfordJ. R.GastD. L. (2018). Single case research methodology. Applications in special education and behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Routledge.
18.
LeeS.-H.WehmeyerM. L.PalmerS. B.SoukupJ. H.LittleT. D. (2008). Self-determination and access to the general education curriculum. The Journal of Special Education, 42(2), 91–107. https://doi.org10.1177/0022466907312354
MazzottiV. L.RoweD. A.KwiatekS.VoggtA.ChangW.-H.FowlerC. H.PoppenM.SinclairJ.TestD. W. (2021). Secondary transition predictors of postschool success: An update to the research base. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 44(1), 47–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143420959793
21.
*MillerB.Taber-DoughtyT. (2014). Self-monitoring checklists for inquiry problem-solving: Functional problem-solving methods for students with intellectual disability. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 49(4), 555–567. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24582351
22.
MoherD.LiberatiA.TetzlaffJ.AltmanD. G. (2009). Preferred reporting items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLOS MEDICINE, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
23.
MorningstarM. E.KurthJ. A.JohnsonP. E. (2017). Examining national trends in educational placements for students with significant disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 38(1), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932516678327
24.
RaleyS. K.BurkeK. M.HagiwaraM.ShogrenK. A.WehmeyerM. L.KurthJ. A. (2020). The Self-Determined Learning Model of Instruction and students with extensive support needs in inclusive settings. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 58(1), 82–90. https://doi.org/10.1352/1934-9556-58.1.82
25.
RaleyS. K.ShogrenK. A.McDonaldA. (2018). Whole-class implementation of the Self-Determined Learning Model of Instruction in inclusive high school mathematics classes. Inclusion, 6(3), 164–174. https://doi.org/10.1352/2326-6988-6.3.164
26.
*RootJ. R.CoxS. K.DavisK.HammonsN. (2020). Contextualizing mathematical problem-solving instruction for secondary students with extensive support needs: A systematic replication. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 45(4), 241–255. https://doi.org/10.1177/1540796920949448
27.
RoweD. A.MazzottiV. L.FowlerC. H.TestD. W.MitchellV. J.ClarkK. A.HolzbergD.OwensT. L.RusherD.Seaman-TullisR. L.GushanasC. M.CastleH.ChangW.-H.VoggtA.KwiatekS.DeanC. (2021). Updating the secondary transition research base: Evidence-and research-based practices in functional skills. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 44(1), 28–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143420958674
28.
SegallM. J.CampbellJ. M. (2014). Factors influencing the educational placement of students with autism spectrum disorders. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 8(1), 31–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2013.10.006
29.
ShogrenK. A.AndersonM. H.RaleyS. K.HagiwaraM. (2021). Exploring the relationship between student and teacher/proxy-respondent scores on the Self-Determination Inventory. Exceptionality, 29(1), 47–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/09362835.2020.1729764
30.
*ShogrenK. A.BurkeK. M.AndersonM. H.AntoshA. A.WehmeyerM. L.LaPlanteT.ShawL. A. (2018). Evaluating the differential impact of interventions to promote self-determination and goal attainment for transition-age youth with intellectual disability. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 43(3), 165–180. http://doi.org/10.1177/1540796918779775
31.
*ShogrenK. A.BurkeK. M.AntoshA.WehmeyerM. L.LaPlanteT.ShawL. A.RaleyS. (2019). Impact of the Self-Determined Learning Model of Instruction on self-determination and goal attainment in adolescents with intellectual disability. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 30(1), 22–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/1044207318792178
32.
ShogrenK. A.PalmerS. B.WehmeyerM. L.Williams-DiehmK.LittleT. D. (2012). Effect of intervention with the Self-Determined Learning Model of Instruction on access and goal attainment. Remedial and Special Education, 33(5), 320–330. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932511410072
33.
ShogrenK. A.RaleyS. K. (2022). Causal agency theory: A theoretical framework for understanding self-determination. In ShogrenK. A.RaleyS. K. (Eds.), Self-determination and causal agency theory (pp. 29–36). Springer.
34.
ShogrenK. A.RaleyS. K.BurkeK. M.WehmeyerM. L. (2018). The Self-Determined Learning Model of Instruction: Teacher’s guide. Kansas University Center on Developmental Disabilities.
35.
ShogrenK. A.RaleyS. K.RifenbarkG. G.LaneK. L.BojanekE. K.KarpurA.QuirkC. (2021). The Self-Determined Learning Model of Instruction: Promoting implementation fidelity. Inclusion, 9(1), 46–62. https://doi.org/10.1352/2326-6988-9.1.46
36.
ShogrenK. A.ShawL. A.RaleyS. K.WehmeyerM. L. (2018). Exploring the effect of disability, race-ethnicity, and socioeconomic status on scores on the Self-Determination Inventory: Student report. Exceptional Children, 85(1), 10–27. http://doi.org/10.1177/0014402918782150
37.
ShogrenK. A.WehmeyerM. L.LaneK. L. (2016). Embedding interventions to promote self-determination within multitiered systems of supports. Exceptionality, 24(4), 213–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/09362835.2015.1064421
38.
ShogrenK. A.WehmeyerM. L.PalmerS. B. (2017). Causal agency theory. In WehmeyerM. L.ShogrenK. A.LittleT. D.LopezS. J. (Eds.), Development of self-determination through the life-course (pp. 55–67). Springer.
39.
ShogrenK. A.WehmeyerM. L.PalmerS. B.Forber-PrattA. J.LittleT. J.LopezS. (2015). Causal agency theory: Reconceptualizing a functional model of self-determination. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 50(3), 251–263.
40.
ShogrenK. A.WehmeyerM. L.PalmerS. B.RifenbarkG. G.LittleT. D. (2015). Relationships between self-determination and postschool outcomes for youth with disabilities. Journal of Special Education, 48(4), 256–267. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466913489733
41.
ShogrenK. A.ZimmermanK. N.TosteJ. R. (2021). The potential for developing and supporting self-determination in early childhood and elementary classrooms. In McLeskeyJ.SpoonerF.AlgozzineB.NancyL. W. (Eds.), Handbook of effective inclusive elementary schools: Research and practice (pp. 390–410). Routledge.
42.
SnyderP. A.HemmeterM. L.FoxL. (2015). Supporting implementation of evidence-based practices through practice-based coaching. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 35(3), 133–143. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271121415594925
43.
TaubD. A.McCordJ. A.RyndakD. L. (2017). Opportunities to learn for students with extensive support needs: A context of research-supported practices for all in general education classes. The Journal of Special Education, 51(3), 127–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466917696263
44.
ThompsonJ. R.WehmeyerM. L.ShogrenK. A.SeoH. (2017). The supports paradigm and intellectual and developmental disabilities. In ShogrenK. A.WehmeyerM. L.SinghN. N. (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology in intellectual and developmental disabilities (pp. 23–35). Springer.
Van ReusenA. K.BosC. S.SchumakerJ. B.DeshlerD. D. (1994). Self-advocacy strategies for education and transition planning. Edge Enterprises.
47.
WardM. J. (2005). An historical perspective of self-determination in special education: Accomplishments and challenges. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 30(3), 108–112. https://doi.org/10.2511/rpsd.30.3.108
48.
*WehmeyerM. L.GarnerN.YeagerD.LawrenceM.DavisA. K. (2006). Infusing self-determination into 18-21 services for students with intellectual or developmental disabilities: A multi-stage, multiple component model. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 41(1), 3–13.
49.
WehmeyerM. L.LawrenceM.KelchnerK.PalmerS. B.GarnerN.SoukupJ. H. (2004). Whose future is it anyway? A student-directed transition planning process. Kansas University Center on Developmental Disabilities.
50.
WehmeyerM. L.PalmerS. B. (2011). Whose future is it?Attainment Company.
51.
WehmeyerM. L.PalmerS. B.AgranM.MithaugD. E.MartinJ. E. (2000). Promoting causal agency: The Self-Determined Learning Model of Instruction. Exceptional Children, 66(4), 439–453. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290006600401
52.
*WehmeyerM. L.PalmerS. B.LeeY.Williams-DiehmK.ShogrenK. (2011). A randomized-trial evaluation of the effect of whose future is it anyway? On self-determination. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 34(1), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885728810383559
53.
*WehmeyerM. L.PalmerS. B.Williams-DiehmK.ShogrenK. A.DaviesD. K.StockS. (2011). Technology and self-determination in transition planning: The impact of technology use in transition planning on student self-determination. Journal of Special Education Technology, 26(1), 13–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/016264341102600103
54.
WoodW. M.FowlerC. H.UpholdN.TestD. W. (2005). A review of self-determination interventions with individuals with severe disabilities. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 30(3), 121–146. https://doi.org/10.2511/rpsd.30.3.12
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
