An Investigation of IEP Quality Associated With Special Education Placement for Students With Complex Support Needs

Abstract

Students with complex support needs require individualized education programs (IEPs) to describe their present levels of academic achievement and functional performance (PLAAFP), and the annual goals and supplementary aids and services (SAS) that will be provided to enable them to make progress in the least restrictive environment. Previous research has found that IEPs do not reflect recommended practices and that IEP quality varies by educational placement in inclusive and separate class settings. The purpose of this study was to evaluate a national sample of IEPs of elementary-aged students with complex support needs to determine whether placement predicts IEP quality. We used multilevel regression to measure the extent to which placement predicts overall IEP quality as well as the quality of IEP components, including PLAAFP, goals, and SAS. We did not detect statistically significant differences in IEP quality by placement for any of these IEP components or for overall quality; instead, we found the IEPs consistently failed to meet quality indicators across all four placement types. Given these findings, we suggest implications for future research aimed at improving IEP quality for students with complex support needs.

Keywords

IEP quality complex support needs educational placement

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Cohen

(1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum.

Duke

(2014). Is it RIP for the IEP? The future of individual education plans in an era of accountability. Primary and Middle Years Educator, 12(3), 3–9.

Dukes

Berlingo

(2020). Fissuring barriers to inclusive education for students with severe disabilities. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 45(1), 14–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/1540796919895968

Endrew F. vs. Douglas County School District RE - 1. (2017). https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/580/15-827/

Gee

Gonzalez

Cooper

(2020). Outcomes of inclusive versus separate placements: A matched pairs comparison study. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 45(4), 223–240. https://doi.org/10.1177/1540796920943469

Giangreco

M. F.

(2020). “How can a student with severe disabilities be in a fifth-grade class when he can’t do fifth-grade level work?” Misapplying the least restrictive environment. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 45(1), 23–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/1540796919892733

Hedin

DeSpain

(2018). SMART or not? Writing specific, measurable IEP goals. Teaching Exceptional Children, 51(2), 100–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059918802587

Hott

B. L.

Jones

B. A.

Rodriguez

Brigham

F. J.

Martin

Mirafuentes

(2021). Are rural students receiving FAPE? A descriptive review of IEPs for students with social, emotional, or behavioral needs. Behavior Modification, 45(1), 13–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445518825107

Hunt

Farron-Davis

(1992). A preliminary investigation of IEP quality and content associated with placement in general education versus special education classes. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 17(4), 247–253. https://doi.org/10.1177/154079699201700406

10.

Hunt

Goetz

Anderson

(1986). The quality of IEP objectives associated with placement on integrated versus segregated school sites. Journal of the Association of the Severely Handicapped, 11(2), 125–130. https://doi.org/10.1177/154079698601100206

11.

Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act, P.L. 108-446, H.R. 1350. (2004).

12.

Kleinert

Towles-Reeves

Quenemoen

Thurlow

Fluegge

Weseman

Kerbel

(2015). Where students with the most significant cognitive disabilities are taught. Exceptional Children, 81(3), 312–328. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402914563697

13.

Kruschke

J. K.

(2011). Doing Bayesian data analysis: A tutorial with R and BUGS. Elsevier Academic Press.

14.

Kurth

J. A.

Born

Love

(2016). Ecobehavioral characteristics of self-contained high school classrooms for students with severe cognitive disability. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 41(4), 227–243. https://doi.org/10.1177/1540796916661492

15.

Kurth

J. A.

Ruppar

A. L.

McQueston

J. A.

McCabe

K. M.

Johnston

Toews

S. G.

(2019). Types of supplementary aids and services for students with significant support needs. Journal of Special Education, 52, 208–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466918791156

16.

LaSalle

T. P.

Roach

A. T.

McGrath

(2013). The relationship of IEP quality to curricular access and academic achievement for students with disabilities. International Journal of Special Education, 28(1), 135–144. http://www.internationalsped.com/ijse/issue/view/9/7

17.

Luft

Amiruzzaman

(2018). Examining states’ responses to the IDEA special factors requirements for DHH students. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 29(1), 32–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/1044207317751675

18.

Miller

A. L.

Love

H. R.

Kurth

J. A.

Zagona

A. L.

(2019). Parent identity and family-school partnerships: Animating diverse enactments for (special) education decision making. Inclusion, 7(2), 92–110. https://doi.org/10.1352/2326-6988-7.2.92

19.

C. M.

Hart Barnett

J. E.

(2014). Developing individualized IEP goals in the age of technology: Quality challenges and solutions. Preventing School Failure, 58(2), 103–109. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/1045988x.2013.782533

20.

Quenemoen

R. F.

Thurlow

M. L.

(2017). Standards-based reform and students with disabilities. In Kauffman

Hallahan

D. P.

Pullen

P. C.

(Eds.), Handbook of special education (pp. 203–217). Taylor & Francis.

21.

Rowland

Quinn

E. D.

Steiner

S. A.

(2015). Beyond legal: Crafting high-quality IEPs for children with complex communication needs. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 37(1), 53–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525740114551632

22.

Ruble

L. A.

McGrew

J. H.

(2013). Teacher and child predictors of achieving IEP goals of children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 43(12), 2748–2763. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-013-1884-x

23.

Ruble

L. A.

McGrew

J. H.

Dalrymple

Jung

L. A.

(2010). Examining the quality of IEPs for young children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 40(12), 1459–1470. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-010-1003-1

24.

Ruppar

A. L.

Fisher

K. W.

Olson

A. J.

Orlando

A.-M.

(2018). Exposure to literacy for students eligible for the alternate assessment. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 53(2), 192–208. https://www.jstor.org/stable/e26495262

25.

Ruppar

A. L.

Kurth

J. A.

(in press). Equitable and inclusive IEPs for students with complex support needs: A roadmap. Brookes.

26.

SAS/STAT 14.1 User’s Guide . (2015). SAS Institute.

27.

Schalock

R. L.

Borthwick-Duffy

Bradley

V. J.

Buntinx

W. H. E.

Coulter

D. L.

Craig

E. M.

Gomez

S. C.

Lachapelle

Luckasoon

R. A.

Reeve

Shogren

Snell

M. E.

Spreat

Tasse

M. J.

Thompson

J. R.

Verdugo-Alonso

M. A.

Wehmeyer

Yeager

M. H.

(2010). Intellectual disability: Definition, classification, and systems of supports (11th ed.). American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.

28.

Serfass

Peterson

R. L.

(2007). A guide to computer-managed IEP record systems. Teaching Exceptional Children, 40(1), 16–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/004005990704000102

29.

Shriner

J. G.

Carty

S. J.

Rose

C. A.

Shogren

K. A.

Kim

Trach

J. S.

(2013). Effects of using a web-based individualized education program decision-making tutorial. The Journal of Special Education, 47(3), 175–185. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466912453940

30.

Spiel

C. F.

Evans

S. W.

Langberg

J. M.

(2014). Evaluating the content of individualized education programs and 504 plans of young adolescents with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. School Psychology Quarterly, 29(4), 452–468. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000101

31.

Stark

Bettini

Cumming

O’Brien

K. M.

Brunsting

Huggins-Manley

Binkert

Shaheen

(2022). Measuring special educators’ working conditions: A systematic review. Remedial and Special Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325221079015

32.

Timberlake

M. T.

(2020). Recognizing ableism in educational initiatives: Reading between the lines. Research in Educational Policy and Management, 2(1), 84–100. https://doi.org/10.46303/repam.02.01.5

33.

Toews

S. G.

Johnston

Kurth

J. A.

Ruppar

A. L.

McQueston

J. A.

McCabe

K. M.

(2021). Alignment of supplementary aids and services with student needs and placement. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 59(3), 187–203. https://doi.org/10.1352/1934-9556-59.3.187

34.

Tran

L. M.

Patton

J. R.

Brohammer

(2018). Preparing educators for developing culturally and linguistically responsive IEPs. Teacher Education and Special Education, 41(3), 229–242. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406418772079

35.

Turnbull

H. R.

Turnbull

Cooper

D. H.

(2018). The Supreme Court, Endrew, and the appropriate education of students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 84(2), 124–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402917734150

36.

Yell

M. L.

Bateman

D. F.

(2018). Free appropriate public education and Endrew F. v. Douglas County School System (2017): Implications for personnel preparation. Teacher Education and Special Education, 42(1), 6–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406417754239

37.

Zirkel

P. A.

Hetrick

(2016). Which procedural parts of the IEP process are the most judicially vulnerable? Exceptional Children, 83(2), 219–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402916651849

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.05 MB