The current study examined the effects of a shared reading instructional package on the receptive identification of English sight vocabulary in multilingual learner students with extensive support needs. Two participants received the intervention, one in a face-to-face format and one in a videoconferencing format (due to the COVID-19 pandemic). To establish experimental control, the researchers used a multiple probe design with conditions across word sets and replicated across participants. Results showed both students met criterion on word sets as a result of the intervention. Considerations in interpreting the results for classroom implementation and future research are discussed.
AkemogluY.HintonV.LaroueD.JeffersonV. (2021). A parent-implemented shared reading intervention via telepractice. Journal of Early Intervention, 44(2), 190–210. https://doi.org/10.1177/10538151211032211
2.
AkemogluY.TomenyK. R. (2021). A parent-implemented shared-reading intervention to promote communication skills of preschoolers with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 51(8), 2974–2987. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-020-04757-0
3.
AlisonC.RootJ. R.BrowderD. M.WoodL. (2017). Technology-based shared story reading for students with autism who are English-language learners. Journal of Special Education Technology, 32(2), 91–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162643417690606
4.
AllorJ. H.Al OtaibaS.OrtizM.FolsomJ. (2014). Comprehensive beginning reading. In BrowderD. M.SpoonerF. (Eds.), More language arts, math, and science for students with severe disabilities (pp. 109–126). Brookes.
5.
AndersonK.ScanlonD. (Eds.). (2020). The development of sight vocabulary. The Reading Teacher, 74(3), 346–352. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1953
6.
AultM. J.CourtadeG.MiracleS. A.BruceA. E. (2020). Providing support for rural special educators during nontraditional instruction: One state’s response. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 39(4), 193–200. https://doi.org/10.1177/8756870520959653
7.
BakerE. A.BradleyC. (2021). Closing the gap between oral lexicons and sight vocabulary: Examining speech recognition technologies. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 21(3), 436–461. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468798419851851
8.
BeeryK. E.BeeryN. A. (2004). The Beery-Buktenica developmental test of visual-motor integration: Administration, scoring, and teaching manual (5th ed.). NCS Pearson.
9.
BrackenB. A.McCallumR. S. (1998). Universal nonverbal intelligence test. Riverside.
10.
BradyN. C.StorkelH. L.BushnellP.BarkerR. M.SaundersK.DanielsD.FlemingK. (2015). Investigating a multimodal intervention for children with limited expressive vocabularies associated with autism. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 24(3), 438–459. https://doi.org/10.1044/2015_AJSLP-14-0093
11.
BrittonN. S.CollinsB. C.AultM. J.BauschM. E. (2017). Using a constant time delay procedure to teach support personnel to use a simultaneous prompting procedure. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 32(2), 102–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088357615587505
12.
BrowderD. M.Ahlgrim-DelzellL.FlowersC.BakerJ. (2012). An evaluation of a multicomponent early literacy program for students with severe developmental disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 33(4), 237–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932510387305
13.
BrowderD. M.MimsP. J.SpoonerF.Ahlgrim-DelzellL.LeeA. (2008). Teaching elementary students with multiple disabilities to participate in shared stories. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 33(1/2), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.2511/rpsd.33.1-2.3
14.
BrowderD. M.TrelaK.JimenezB. (2007). Training teachers to follow a task analysis to engage middle school students with moderate and severe developmental disabilities in grade-appropriate literature. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 22(4), 206–219. https://doi.org/10.1177/10883576070220040301
15.
ChristensenL. L.GholsonM. L.ShyyanV. V. (2018, April). Establishing a definition of English learners with significant cognitive disabilities ALTELLA Brief No. 1 (ALTELLA Brief No. 1). ATELLA. http://altella.wceruw.org/resources.html
16.
CollinsB. C. (2018). Eight paths to leadership: A guide for special educators. Brookes.
17.
CollinsB. C. (2022). Systematic instruction for students with moderate and severe disabilities (2nd ed.). Brookes.
18.
CoogleC. G.FloydK. K.RahnN. L. (2018). Dialogic reading and adapted dialogic reading with preschoolers with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Early Intervention, 40(4), 363–379. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053815118797887
19.
CoogleC. G.ParsonsA. W.La CroixL.OttleyJ. R. (2020). A comparison of dialogic reading, modeling, and dialogic reading plus modeling. Infants & Young Children, 33(2), 119–131. https://doi.org/10.1097/IYC.0000000000000162
20.
D’AgostinoS. R.DueñasA. D.PlavnickJ. B. (2020). Increasing social initiations during shared book reading: An intervention for preschoolers with autism spectrum disorder. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 39(4), 213–225. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271121418816422
21.
DoyleP. M.WoleryM.AultM. J.GastD. L. (1988). System of least prompts: A literature review of procedural parameters. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 13(1), 28–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/154079698801300104
FallonK. A.LightJ.McNaughtonD.DragerK.HammerC. (2004). The effects of direct instruction on the single-word reading skills of children who require augmentative and alternative communication. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47(6), 1424–1439. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388
24.
FlemingD. (1991). In the tall, tall grass. H. Holt.
25.
FleuryV. P.SchwartzI. S. (2017). A modified dialogic reading intervention for preschool children with autism spectrum disorder. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 37(1), 16–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271121416637597
26.
FredrickL. D.DavisD. H.AlbertoP. A.WaughR. E. (2013). From initial phonics to functional phonics: Teaching word-analysis skills to students with moderate intellectual disability. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 48(1), 49–66.
27.
GastD. L.LloydB. P.LedfordJ. R. (2018). Multiple baseline and multiple probe designs. In LedfordJ. R.GastD. L. (Eds.), Single case research methodology: Applications in special education and behavioral sciences (3rd ed., pp. 238–281). Routledge.
28.
HammillD. D.PearsonN. A.WiederholtJ. L. (2009). Comprehensive test of nonverbal intelligence—second edition (CTONI-2). PRO-ED.
29.
HeiligmanD. (1996). From caterpillar to butterfly. HarperCollins.
30.
HeinrichS.CollinsB. C.KnightV.SpriggsA. D. (2016). Embedded simultaneous prompting procedure to teach STEM content to high school students with moderate disabilities in an inclusive setting. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 51(1), 41–54.
31.
HoldawayD. (1979). The foundations of literacy. Ashton Scholastic.
32.
HudsonM. E.TestD. W. (2011). Evaluating the evidence base of shared story reading to promote literacy for students with extensive support needs. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 36(1–2), 34–45. https://doi.org/10.2511/rpsd.36.1-2.34
33.
JacksonS. (2006a). Chip on his ship. Lakeshore Learning Materials.
34.
JacksonS. (2006b). Min and Lin. Lakeshore Learning Materials.
35.
JacksonS. (2006c). The split sweater. Lakeshore Learning Materials.
36.
JenkinsonJ. C. (2006). Word recognition and the nature of reading difficulty in children with an intellectual disability: A review. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 36(1), 39–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/0156655890360105
37.
JohnstonS. S.O’KeeffeB. V.StokesK. (2018). Early literacy support for students with physical disabilities and complex communication needs. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 51(2), 91–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059918802808
38.
JusticeL. M.KaderavekJ. (2002). Using shared storybook reading to promote emergent literacy. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 34(4), 8–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/004005990203400401
39.
KamilM. L. (2003). Adolescents and literacy: Reading for the 21st century. Alliance for Excellent Education.
40.
KurthJ. A.RupparA. L.ToewsS. G.McCabeK. M.McQuestonJ. A.JohnstonR. (2019). Considerations in placement decisions for students with extensive support needs: An analysis of LRE statements. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 44(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1540796918825479
41.
LedfordJ. R.GastD. L. (2018). Single case research methodology: Applications in special education and behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Routledge.
42.
MimsP. J.BrowderD. M.BakerJ. N.LeeA.SpoonerF. (2009). Increasing comprehension of students with significant intellectual disabilities and visual impairments during shared stories. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 44(3), 409–420.
43.
MucchettiC. A. (2013). Adapted shared reading at school for minimally verbal students with autism. Autism, 17(3), 358–372. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361312470495
44.
MuellerT.SingerG.CarranzaF. (2006). A national survey of the educational planning and language instruction practices for students with moderate to severe disabilities who are English language learners. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 31(3), 242–254. https://doi.org/10.1177/154079690603100304
45.
National Reading Panel. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel: Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health. https://www.nichd.nih.gov/sites/default/files/publications/pubs/nrp/Documents/report.pdf
46.
OrihuelaS. M.CollinsB. C.SpriggsA. D.KleinertH. (2019). Including nontargeted information when teaching multiple exemplars of geometric shapes to elementary students with moderate intellectual disability. Journal of Behavioral Education, 28(2), 169–186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-018-09314-5
47.
RiveraC. J.HudsonM. E.WeissS. L.ZamboneA. (2017). Using a multicomponent multimedia shared story intervention with an iPad to teach content picture vocabulary to students with developmental disabilities. Education and Treatment of Children, 40(3), 327–352. https://doi.org/10.1353/etc.2017.0014
48.
RiveraC. J.MasonL.MoserJ.Ahlgrim-DelzellL. (2014). The effects of an iPad® multimedia shared story intervention on vocabulary acquisition for an English language learner. Journal of Special Education Technology, 29(4), 31–48. https://doi-org.libproxy.nau.edu/10.1177%2F016264341402900403
49.
RiveraC. J.WoodC. L.SpoonerF. (2012). Comparative effects of Spanish and English vocabulary instruction for English language learners with moderate intellectual disability. Multiple Voices for Ethnically Diverse Exceptional Learners, 13(1), 42–55. https://doi.org/10.5555/muvo.13.1.yp4312725mh153uw
50.
RobertsC. A.LekoM. M. (2013). Integrating functional and academic goals into literacy instruction for adolescents with significant cognitive disabilities through shared story reading. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 38(3), 157–172. https://doi.org/10.1177/154079691303800303
51.
SnodgrassM. R.ChungM. Y.Meadan-KaplanskyH.HalleJ. W. (2018). Social validity in single-case research: A systematic literature review of prevalence and application. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 74, 160–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2018.01.007
52.
SparrowS. S.CicchettiD. V.BallaD. A. (2005). Vineland-II Adaptive Behavior Scales, Second Edition, Survey Forms Manual. PsychCorp.
53.
SpoonerF.RiveraC. J.BrowderD. M.BakerJ. N.SalasS. (2009). Teaching emergent literacy skills using cultural contextual story-based lessons. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 34(3–4), 102–112. https://doi.org/10.2511/rpsd.34.3-4.102
54.
StenhoffD. M.PenningtonR. C.TappM. C. (2020). Distance education support for students with autism spectrum disorder and complex needs during COVID-19 and school closures. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 39(4), 211–219. https://doi.org/10.1177/8756870520959658
55.
TaubD. A.McCordJ. A.RyndakD. L. (2017). Opportunities to learn for students with extensive support needs: A context of research-supported practices for all in general education classes. The Journal of Special Education, 51(3), 127–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466917696263
56.
ToewsS. G.McQuestonJ.KurthJ. A. (2021). Evaluation of the evidence base for shared reading to support literacy skill development for students with extensive support needs. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 46(2), 77–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/15407969211008531
57.
TonsingK. M.SotoG. (2020). Multilingualism and augmentative and alternative communication: Examining language ideology and resulting practices. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 36(3), 190–201. https://doi.org/10.2080/07434618.2020.1811761
58.
TremmelP.MyersR.BrunowD. A.HottB. L. (2020). Educating students with disabilities during the COVID-19 pandemic: Lessons learned from Commerce Independent School District. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 39(4), 201–210. https://doi.org/10.1177/8756870520958114
WehmeyerM. L.PalmerS. B. (2003). Adult outcomes for students with cognitive disabilities three-years after high school: The impact of self-determination. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 38(2), 131–144.
61.
WhalonK.MartinezJ. R.ShannonD.ButcherC.HanlineM. F. (2015). The impact of reading to engage children with autism in language and learning (RECALL). Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 35(2), 102–115. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271121414565515
62.
WolfM. M. (1978). Social validity: The case for subjective measurement or how applied behavior analysis is finding its heart. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11(2), 203–214. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1978.11-203
YahyaS.YunusM. M.ToranH. (2013). Instructional practices in enhancing sight vocabulary acquisition of ESL students with autism. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 93, 266–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.09.187
65.
YorkeA. M.LightJ. C.Gosnell CaronJ.McNaughtonD. B.DragerK. D. (2018). The effects of explicit instruction in academic vocabulary during shared book reading on the receptive vocabulary of children with complex communication needs. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 34(4), 288–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434618.2018.1506823
