We acknowledge that some students with severe disabilities are not being taught in general education. We do not agree that inclusion in general education is inherently better, nor do we think it is always appropriate, and we provide some reasons that a full continuum of alternative placements is not only legally mandated but appropriate. We are supportive of placement in general education for children with severe disabilities when it is appropriate.
AgranM.JacksonL.KurthJ. A.RyndakD.BurnetteK.JamesonM.ZagonaA.FitzpatrickH.WehmeyerM. (2020). Why aren’t students with severe disabilities being placed in general education classrooms? Examining the relations among classroom placement, learner outcomes, and other factors. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/1540796919878134.
2.
CookB.CookL. (in press). An examination of highly-cited research on inclusion. In KauffmanJ. M. (Ed.), On educational inclusion: Meanings, history, issues and international perspectives. Routledge.
3.
CooperJ. T.ScottT. M.WhitneyT. (in press). A science of instruction and its implications for students with disabilities. In KauffmanJ. M. (Ed.), On educational inclusion: Meanings, history, issues and international perspectives. Routledge.
4.
CourtadeG.SpoonerF.BrowderD.JimenezB. (2012). Seven reasons to promote standards-based instruction for students with severe disabilities: A reply to Ayres, Lowrey, Douglas, & Sievers (2011). Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 47(1), 3–13.
5.
CrockettJ. B. (in press). Inclusion as idea and its justification in law. In KauffmanJ. M. (Ed.), On educational inclusion: Meanings, history, issues and international perspectives. Routledge.
6.
FuchsL. S.FuchsD.ComptonD. L.WehbyJ.SchumacherR. F.GerstenR.JordanN. C. (2014). Inclusion versus specialized intervention for very-low-performing students: What does access mean in an era of academic challenge?Exceptional Children, 81(2), 134–157. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402914551743
7.
GerberM. M.SemmelM. I. (1985). The microeconomics of referral and reintegration: A paradigm for evaluation of special education. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 11(1), 13–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-491X(85)90030-6
8.
HornbyG. (2014). Inclusive special education: Evidence-based practices for children with special needs and disabilities. Springer.
9.
ImrayP.ColleyA. (2017). Inclusion is dead: Long live inclusion. Routledge.
KauffmanJ. M.AhrbeckB.AnastasiouD.BadarJ.FelderM.HallenbeckB. A. (in press). Special education policy prospects: Lessons from social policies past. Exceptionality.
KauffmanJ. M.BadarJ. (in press). Definitions and other issues. In KauffmanJ. M. (Ed.), On educational inclusion: Meanings, history, issues and international perspectives. Routledge.
14.
KauffmanJ. M.HallahanD. P. (1997). A diversity of restrictive environments: Placement as a problem of social ecology. In LloydJ. W.KameenuiE. J.ChardD. (Eds.), Issues in educating students with disabilities (pp. 325–342). Lawrence Erlbaum.
15.
LaskiF. J. (1991). Achieving integration during the second revolution. In MeyerL. H.PeckC. A.BrownL. (Eds.), Critical issues in the lives of people with severe disabilities (pp. 409–421). Paul H. Brookes.
16.
SpecterM. (2009). Denialism: How irrational thinking hinders scientific progress, harms the planet, and threatens our lives. Penguin.
17.
SunsteinC. R. (2009). Going to extremes: How like minds unite and divide. Oxford University Press.
18.
TraversJ. C.ForbesH.JohnsonJ. V.AyresK. (in press). Inclusion and students with severe, sensory, and multiple impairments. In KauffmanJ. M. (Ed.), On educational inclusion: Meanings, history, issues and international perspectives. Routledge.
