Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2020-3
Why Aren’t Students with Severe Disabilities Being Placed in General Education Classrooms: Examining the Relations Among Classroom Placement,Learner Outcomes,and Other Factors
Placement decisions for students with severe disabilities have often been based less on the students’ unique learning needs but more on beliefs and presumptions about student learning, entrenched school district policies that restrict program delivery options, and other variables unrelated to student needs. In light of the benefits associated with inclusive practices for students with severe disabilities, this article examines the foregoing factors to better understand how they affect placement decisions and to identify barriers to implementing at a national level more inclusive placements. The article also addresses systems change solutions, and several new federally funded initiatives that could contribute to authentic changes in placement practices.
AgranM.AlperS.WehmeyerM. (2002). Access to the general curriculum for students with significant disabilities: What it means to teachers. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 37, 123-133.
2.
AgranM.SpoonerF.BrownF. (2015). Research and values: An inextricable relationship. In AgranM.SpoonerF.GeeK.TraderB. (Eds.), TASH: 40 years of progressive leadership (pp. 50-59). Virginia Beach, VA: Donning Publishers.
3.
BrockM. E. (2018). Trends in the educational placement of students with intellectual disability in the United States over the past 40 years. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 123, 305-314. doi:10.1352/1944-7558-123.4.305
4.
BrockM. E.SchaeferJ. M. (2015). Location matters: Geographic location and educational placement of students with developmental disabilities. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 40, 154-164. doi:10.1177/1540796915591988
5.
CarterE. W.HughesC. (2006). Including high school students with severe disabilities in general education classes: Perspectives of general and special educators, paraprofessionals, and administrators. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 31, 174-185. doi:10.1177/154079690603100209
6.
ChoiJ. H.MeisenheimerJ. M.McCartA.SailorW. (2017). Improving learning for all students through equity-based inclusive reform practices: Effectiveness of a fully integrated schoolwide model on student reading and math achievement. Remedial and Special Education, 38, 28-41. doi:10.1177/0741932516644054
7.
ColeC. M.WaldronN.MajdM. (2004). Academic progress of students across inclusive and traditional settings. Mental Retardation, 42, 136-144. doi:10.1352/0047-6765(2004)42<136:APOSAI>2.0.CO;2
8.
ConnorD. J.FerriB. A. (2007). The conflict within: Resistance to inclusion and other paradoxes in special education. Disability & Society, 22, 63-77. doi:10.1080/09687590601056717
9.
CopelandS. R.CosbeyJ. (2008). Making progress in the general curriculum: Rethinking effective instructional practices. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 34, 214-227. doi:10.2511/rpsd.33.4.214
10.
CopelandS. R.KeefeE. B.CalhoonA. J.TannerW.ParkS. (2011). Preparing teachers to provide literacy instruction to all students: Faculty experiences and perceptions. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 36, 126-141. doi:10.2511/027494811800824499
11.
CushingL. S.KennedyC. H. (1997). Academic effects of providing peer support in general education classrooms on students without disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 30, 139-151. doi:10.1901/jaba.1997.30-139
12.
DowningJ. E. (2008). Including students with severe and multiple disabilities in typical classrooms: Practical strategies for teachers. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
13.
EasterlingD.MetzA. (2016). Getting real with strategies: Insights from implementation science. The Foundation Review, 8, 97-115. doi:10.9707/1944-5660.1301
14.
Endrew F. v. Douglas County School District Re-1, 137 S. Ct. 988 (March22, 2017).
15.
FisherM.MeyerL. H. (2002). Development and social competence after two years for students enrolled in inclusive and self-contained educational programs. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 27, 165-174. doi:10.2511/rpsd.27.3.165
HagamanJ. L.CaseyK. J. (2018). Teacher attrition in special education: Perspectives from the field. Teacher Education and Special Education, 41, 277-291. doi:10.1177/0888406417725797
18.
HughesC.CosgriffJ. C.AgranM.WashingtonB. H. (2013). Student self-determination: A preliminary investigation of the role of participation in inclusive settings. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 48, 3-17.
19.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act, 20 U.S. C. § 1140 et seq. (2004).
20.
JacksonL. B.RyndakD. L.WehmeyerM. L. (2008). The dynamic relationship between context, curriculum, and student learning: A case for inclusive education as a research-based practice. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 34, 175-195. doi:10.2511/rpsd.33.4.175
21.
JohnsonL. D.WehbyJ. H.SymonsF. J.MooreT. C.MagginD. M.SutherlandK. S. (2014). An analysis of preference relative to teacher implementation of interventions. The Journal of Special Education, 48, 214-224. doi:10.1177/0022466913475872
22.
KauffmanJ. M.AnastasiouD.BadarJ.TraversJ. C.WileyA. L. (2016). Inclusive education moving forward. In BakkenJ. P.ObiakorF. E.RotatoriA. (Eds.), General and special education in an age of change: Roles of professionals involved (Advances in Special Education, Vol. 32, pp. 153-178). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group.
23.
KleinertH.Towles-ReevesE.QuenemoenR.ThurlowM.FlueggeL.WesemanL.KerbelA. (2015). Where students with the most significant cognitive disabilities are taught: Implications for general curriculum access. Exceptional Children, 81, 312-328. doi:10.1177/0014402914563697
24.
KuntzE.CarterE. (2019). Review of interventions supporting secondary students with intellectual disability in general education classes. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 44, 103-121. doi:10.1177/1540796919847483
25.
KurthJ. A.KeeganL. (2014). Development and use of curricular adaptations for students receiving special education services. The Journal of Special Education, 48, 191-203. doi:10.1177/0022466912464782
26.
KurthJ. A.MastergeorgeA. M. (2010). Individual education plan goals and services for adolescents with autism: Impact of grade and educational setting. The Journal of Special Education, 44, 146-160. doi:10.1177/0022466908329825
27.
KurthJ. A.MastergeorgeA. M. (2012). Impact of setting and instructional context for adolescents with autism. The Journal of Special Education, 46, 36-48. doi:10.1177/0022466910366480
28.
KurthJ. A.MastergeorgeA. M.PaschallK. (2016). Economic and demographic factors impacting placement of students with autism. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 51, 3-12.
29.
LyonA. R.CookC. R.BrownE. C.LockeJ.DavisC.EhrhartM.AaronsG. A. (2018). Assessing organizational implementation context in the education sector: Confirmatory factor analysis of measures of implementation leadership, climate, and citizenship. Implementation Science, 13(5), Article 5. doi:10.1186/s13012-017-0705-6
30.
LyonsJ.CappadociaM. C.WeissJ. A. (2011). Social characteristics of students with autism spectrum disorders across classroom settings. Journal on Developmental Disabilities, 17, 77-82.
31.
McDonnellJ.JohnsonJ. W.PolychronisS.RiesenT. (2002). Effects of embedded instruction on students with moderate disabilities enrolled in general education classes. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 37, 363-377.
32.
McLeskeyJ.WaldronN. L.ReddL. (2014). A case study of a highly effective, inclusive elementary school. The Journal of Special Education, 48, 59-70. doi:10.1177/0022466912440455
33.
MetzA.BartleyL.BallH.WilsonD.NaoomS.RedmondP. (2015). Active implementation frameworks for successful service delivery: Catawba County Child Wellbeing Project. Research on Social Work Practice, 25, 415-422. doi:10.1177/1049731514543667
34.
MorningstarM. E.KurthJ. A.JohnsonP. J. (2017). Examining national trends in educational placements for students with significant disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 38, 3-12. doi:10.1177/0741932516678327
35.
National Center on Response to Intervention. (2010). Essential components of RTI: A closer look at response to intervention. Washington DC: National Center on Response to Intervention, Office of Special Education Programs, U.S. Department of Special Education.
36.
PollowayE. A.YangL.BouckE. C. (2019). Educational programs for students with intellectual disability: Demographic patterns. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 54, 30-40.
37.
RupparA. L.NeeperL. S.DalsenJ. (2016). Special education teachers’ perceptions of preparedness to teach students with severe disabilities. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 41, 273-286. doi:10.1177/1540796916672843
38.
RyndakD. L.ReardonR.BennerS. R.WardT. (2007). Transitioning to and sustaining district-wide inclusive services: A 7-year study of a district’s ongoing journey and its accompanying complexities. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 32, 228-246. doi:10.2511/rpsd.32.4.228
39.
SailorW. S.McCartA. B. (2014). Stars in alignment. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 39, 55-64. doi:10.1177/1540796914534622
40.
SegallM. J.CampbellJ. M. (2014). Factors influencing the educational placement of students with autism spectrum disorders. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 8, 31-43. doi:10.1016/j.rasd.2013.10.006
41.
ShogrenK. A.McCartA. B.LyonK. J.SailorW. S. (2015). All means all: Building knowledge for inclusive schoolwide transformation. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 40, 173-191. doi:10.1177/1540796915586191
42.
SindelarP. T.ShearerD. K.Yendol-HoppeyD.LiebertT. W. (2006). The sustainability of inclusive school reform. Exceptional Children, 72, 317-331. doi:10.1177/001440290607200304
43.
SingerG.AgranM.SpoonerF. (2017). Evidence based and values based practice for people with severe disabilities. Research and Practices for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 42, 62-72. doi:10.1177/1540796916685050
44.
SoukupJ. H.WehmeyerM. L.BashinskiS. M.BovairdJ. A. (2007). Classroom variables and access to the general curriculum for students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 74, 101-120.
WehmeyerM. L. (2019). Strengths-based approaches to educating all learners with disabilities: Beyond special education. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
48.
ZagonaA. L.KurthJ. A.MacFarlandS. Z. C. (2017). Teachers’ views of their preparation for inclusive education and collaboration. Teacher Education and Special Education, 40, 163-178. doi:10.1177/0888406417692969
