AllorJ. H.MathesP. G.RobertsJ. K.JonesF. G.ChamplinT. M. (2010). Teaching students with moderate intellectual disabilities to read: An experimental examination of a comprehensive reading intervention. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 45, 3-22.
2.
BakerJ. N.SpoonerF.FlowersC.Ahlgrim-DelzellL.BrowderD. M. (2010). A measure of emergent literacy for students with severe developmental disabilities. Psychology in the Schools, 47, 501-513. doi:10.1002/pits.20486
3.
BanduraA. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
4.
BanduraA. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
5.
BonettD. G. (2012). Replication-extension studies. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21, 409-412. doi:10.1177/0963721412459512
6.
BradfordS.ShippenM. E.AlbertoP.HouchinsD. E.FloresM. (2006). Using systematic instruction to teach decoding skills to middle school students with moderate intellectual disabilities. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 41, 333-343.
7.
BrowderD.Ahlgrim-DelzellL.CourtadeG.GibbsS.FlowersC. (2008). Evaluation of the effectiveness of an early literacy program for students with significant developmental disabilities. Exceptional Children, 75, 33-52. doi:10.1177/001440290807500102
8.
BrowderD.Ahlgrim-DelzellL.SpoonerF.MimsP. J.BakerJ. N. (2009). Using Time delay to teach literacy to students with severe developmental disabilities. Exceptional Children, 75, 343-364. doi:10.1177/001440290907500305
9.
BrowderD. M.Ahlgrim-DelzellL.FlowersC.BakerJ. N. (2012). An evaluation of a multicomponent early literacy program for students with severe developmental disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 33, 237-246. doi:10.1177/074193251038730
10.
CollinsB. C.EvansA.Creech-GallowayC.KarlJ.MillerA. (2007). Comparison of the acquisition and maintenance of teaching functional and core content sight words in special and general education settings. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 22, 220-233. doi:10.1177/10883576070220040401
11.
CoyneM. D.CookB. G.TherrienW. J. (2016). Recommendations for replication research in special education: A framework of systematic, conceptual replications. Remedial and Special Education, 37, 244-253. doi:10.1177/0741932516648463
12.
DoablerC. T.ClarkeB.KrostyD. B.Kurtz-NelsonE.FienH.SmolkowskiK.BakerS. K. (2016). Testing the efficacy of a tier 2 mathematics intervention: A conceptual replication study. Exceptional Children, 83, 92-110. doi:10.1177/0014402916660084
13.
HudsonM. E.BrowderD. M. (2014). Improving listening comprehension responses for students with moderate intellectual disability during literacy class. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 39, 11-29. doi:10.1177/1540796914534636
14.
HuntP.KozleskiE. B.LeeJ.FlemingD.HicksT.MortierK.. . . OhY. (2019). Implementing comprehensive emergent literacy instruction for students with severe disabilities in general education classrooms. Manuscript submitted for publication.
15.
KazdinA. E. (1977). Assessing the clinical or applied importance of behavior change through social validation. Behavior Modification, 1, 427-452. doi:10.1177/014544557714001
16.
LemonsC. J.MrachkoA. A.KostewiczD. E.PaterraM. F. (2012). Effectiveness of decoding and phonological awareness interventions for children with Down syndrome. Exceptional Children, 79, 67-90. doi:10.1177/001440291207900104
17.
LindoE. J.EllemanA. M. (2010). Social validity’s presence in field-based reading intervention research. Remedial and Special Education, 3, 489-499. doi:10.1177/074193251061249
18.
MacGinitieW. H.MacGinitieR. K.MariaK.DreyerL. G. (2000). Gates-MacGinitie Reading Tests, Fourth Edition, Forms S and T. Itasca, IL: Riverside Publishing.
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (NIH Pub. No. 00-4769). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
21.
RaudenbushS. W.BrykA. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
22.
RupparA. L.AfracanK.YangY.PickettK. J. (2017). Embedded shared reading to increase literacy in an inclusive English/language arts class: Preliminary efficacy and ecological validity. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 52, 51-63.
23.
SingerJ. D.WillettJ. B. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis: Modeling change and event occurrence. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
24.
ToewsS. G.KurthJ. A. (2019). Literacy instruction in general education settings: A call to action. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 44, 135-142. doi:10.1177/1540796919855373
25.
WhalonK. J.OtaibaS. A.DelanoM. E. (2009). Evidence-based reading instruction for individuals with autism spectrum disorders. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 24, 3-16. doi:10.1177/1088357608328515
26.
WolfM. M. (1978). Social validity: The case for subjective measurement or how applied behavior analysis is finding its heart. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 203-214. doi:10.1901/jaba.1978.11-203