Since the introduction of supported employment in the Developmental Disabilities Act of 1984 and the Rehabilitation Act Amendments of 1986, there has been continued development and refinement of best practices in employment services and supports. Progress includes creative outcomes for individuals with significant support needs including customized jobs and self-employment, community rehabilitation providers that have shifted emphasis to integrated employment, and states that have made a substantial investment in Employment First policy and strategy. Despite these achievements, the promise of integrated employment remains elusive for the majority of individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities. The number of individuals supported in integrated employment by state agencies has remained stagnant for the past 15 years, participation in nonwork services has grown rapidly, and individual employment supports have not been implemented with fidelity. This article presents preliminary findings from activities completed by the Rehabilitation Research and Training Center on Advancing Employment for Individuals with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities and discusses a framework for organizing state and federal investments in research, practice, and systems change.
AlmutairiR. A. (2016). Parent perceptions of transition services effectiveness for students with intellectual disabilities. International Interdisciplinary Journal of Education, 5(6), 1-9. doi:10.12816/0036036
2.
BlusteinC. L.CarterE. W.McMillanE. D. (2016). The voices of parents: Post-high school expectations, priorities, and concerns for children with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Journal of Special Education, 50, 164-177. doi:10.1177/0022466916641381
3.
ButterworthJ.FeskoS. L.MaV. (2000). Because it was the right thing to do: Changeover from facility based services to community employment. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 14, 23-35.
4.
ButterworthJ.GandolfoC.RevellW. G.IngeK. (2007). Community rehabilitation programs and organizational change: A mentor guide to increase customized employment outcomes. Boston, MA: Institute for Community Inclusion.
ButterworthJ.MiglioreA.NordD.GelbA. (2012). Improving the employment outcomes of job seekers with intellectual and developmental disabilities: A training and mentoring intervention for employment consultants. Journal of Rehabilitation, 78(2), 20-29.
7.
CertoN. J.LueckingR.MurphyS.CoureyS.BelangerD. (2008). Seamless transition and long-term support for individuals with severe intellectual disabilities. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 33, 85-95. doi:10.2511/rpsd.33.3.85
8.
HallA. C.BoseJ.WinsorJ.MiglioreA. (2014). From research to practice: Knowledge translation in job development. Inclusion, 2, 65-79. doi:10.1352/2326-6988-2.1.65
9.
HallA. C.ButterworthJ.WinsorJ.GilmoreD.MetzelD. (2007). Pushing the employment agenda: Case study research of high performing states in integrated employment. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 43, 182-198. doi:10.1352/1934-9556(2007)45[182: PTEACS]2.0.CO;2
10.
HenningerN. A.TaylorJ. L. (2014). Family perspectives on a successful transition to adulthood for individuals with disabilities. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 52, 98-111. doi:10.1352/1934-9556-52.2.98
11.
HetheringtonS. A.Durant-JonesL.JohnsonK.NolanK.SmithE.Taylor-BrownS.TuttleJ. (2010). The lived experiences of adolescents with disabilities and their parents in transition planning. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 25, 163-172. doi:10.1177/1088357610373760
12.
HiersteinerD.BershadskyJ.BonardiA.ButterworthJ. (2016). Working in the community: The status and outcomes of people with intellectual and developmental disabilities in integrated employment—Update 2 (NCI data brief). Cambridge, MA: Human Services Research Institute.
IngeK. J.WehmanP.RevellG.EricksonD.ButterworthJ.GilmoreD. S. (2009). Survey results from a national survey of community rehabilitation providers holding special wage certificates. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 30, 67-85. doi:10.3233/JVR-2009-0454
15.
KiernanW. E.HoffD.FreezeS.MankD. M. (2011). Employment First: A beginning not an end. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 49, 300-304. doi:10.1352/1934-9556-49.4.300
16.
KramerJ. (2017). RRTC state of the science: Engaging individuals and families in employment planning and supports. Boston, MA: Institute for Community Inclusion.
17.
KramerJ.BoseJ.WinsorJ. (in press). Families and employment of people with intellectual and developmental disabilities: Results from a scoping study. TASH Connections.
18.
LyonsO.TimmonsJ.HallA. C.LeBloisS. (in press). The essential characteristics of successful organizational transformation: Findings from a Delphi panel of experts. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation.
19.
MartinezJ.FrakerT.MannoM.BairdP.MamunA.O’DayB.. . . WittenburgD. (2010). The social security administration’s youth transition demonstration projects: Implementation lessons from the original projects. Washington, DC: Mathematica Policy Research.
20.
MiglioreA. (2018). Strengthening employment services for job seekers with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Manuscript in preparation.
21.
MiglioreA.ButterworthJ.NordD.CoxM.GelbA. (2012). Implementation of job development practices. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 50, 207-218. doi:10.1352/1934-9556-50.3.207
22.
MiglioreA.HallA.ButterworthJ.WinsorJ. (2010). What do employment specialists really do? A study on job development practices. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 35, 15-23. doi:10.2511/rpsd.35.1-2.15
23.
MiglioreA.Nye-LengermanK.LyonsO.BoseJ.ButterworthJ. (2018). A model of employment supports for job seekers with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Rehabilitation, 84(2), 3-13.
National Council on Disability. (2008). Keeping track: National disability status and program performance indicators. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from https://ncd.gov/publications/2008/April212008
26.
NordD.BarkoffA.ButterworthJ.CarlsonD.CimeraR.FabianE.. . . WohlA. (2015). Employment and economic self-sufficiency: 2015 national goals for research, policy, and practice. Inclusion, 3, 227-232. doi:10.1352/2326-6988-3.4.227
27.
NordD.LueckingR.MankD.KiernanW.WrayC. (2013). The state of the science of employment and economic self-sufficiency for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 51, 376-384. doi:10.1352/1934-9556-51.5.376
28.
Nye-LengermanK.TimmonsJ. (2017). RRTC state of the science: Delivering effective employment supports: Organizational design and capacity building. Boston, MA: Institute for Community Inclusion.
29.
RoganP.RinneS. (2011). National call for organizational change from sheltered to integrated employment. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 49, 248-260. doi:10.1352/1934-9556-49.4.248
30.
RosenthalD. A.HiattE. K.AndersonC. A.BrooksJ.HartmanE. C.WilsonM. T.FujikawaM. (2012). Facilitators and barriers to integrated employment: Results of focus group analysis. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 36, 73-86. doi:10.3233/JVR-2012-0583
31.
SmithF.WinsorJ.HallA. (2018). State employment system performance composite indicator. Unpublished manuscript.
32.
SnyderT. D.de BreyC.DillowS. A. (2018). Digest of education statistics 2016 (NCES 2017-094). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
33.
SulewskiJ. S.TimmonsJ. C.LyonsO.LucasJ.VogtT.BachmeyerK. (2017). Organizational transformation to integrated employment and community life engagement. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 46, 313-320. doi:10.3233/JVR-170867
34.
TimmonsJ. C.CohenA.FeskoS. L. (2004). Merging cultural differences and professional identities: Strategies for maximizing collaborative efforts during the implementation of the Workforce Investment Act. Journal of Rehabilitation, 70, 19-27.
35.
TimmonsJ. C.HallA. C.BoseJ.WolfeA.WinsorJ. (2011). Choosing employment: Factors that impact employment decisions for individuals with intellectual disability. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 49, 285-299. doi:10.1352/1934-9556-49.4.285
36.
U.S. Department of Health Human Services, Centers for Medicare Medicaid Services, Center for Medicaid, CHIP, & Survey & Certification. (2011). CMCS informational bulletin: Updates to the §1915 (c) Waiver instructions and technical guide regarding employment and employment related services. Retrieved from https://downloads.cms.gov/cmsgov/archived-downloads/CMCSBulletins/downloads/CIB-9-16-11.pdf
37.
U.S. Department of Health Human Services, Centers for Medicare Medicaid Services, Center for Medicaid, CHIP, & Survey & Certification. (2014). Medicaid program; state plan home and community-based services, 5-year period for waivers, provider payment reassignment, and home and community-based setting requirements for community first choice (section 1915(k) of the Act) and Home and Community-Based Services (HCBS) waivers (Section 1915(c) of the Act). Retrieved from https://www.medicaid.gov/medicaid/hcbs/downloads/final-rule-slides-01292014.pdf
38.
U.S. Government Accountability Office. (2012). Students with disabilities: Better federal coordination could lessen challenges in the transition from high school (GAO-12-594). Retrieved from https://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-12-594
39.
WagnerM.NewmanL.JavitzH. (2014). The influence of family socioeconomic status on the post–high school outcomes of youth with disabilities. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 37, 5-17. doi:10.1177/2165143414523980
40.
WehmanP.IngeK. J.RevellW. G.BrookeV. (Eds.). (2007). Real work for real pay: Inclusive employment for people with disabilities. Baltimore, MD: Paul H Brookes.
41.
WestE. A.PattonH. A. (2010). Positive behaviour support and supported employment for adults with severe disability. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 35, 104-111. doi:10.3109/13668251003694580
42.
WinsorJ.ButterworthJ.LugasJ.HallA. (2010). Washington state division of developmental disabilities jobs by 21 partnership project report for FY 2009. Boston, MA: Institute for Community Inclusion.
43.
WinsorJ.HallA. C. (2017). RRTC state of the science: State systems and policy issues. Boston, MA: Institute for Community Inclusion.
44.
WinsorJ.LandaC.NarbyC.HallA. (in press). Case study findings from Maryland. Boston, MA: Institute for Community Inclusion.
45.
WinsorJ.TimmonsJ.ButterworthJ.ShepardJ.LandaC.SmithF.. . . LandimL. (2017). StateData: The national report on employment services and outcomes. Boston, MA: Institute for Community Inclusion.
46.
Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act of 2014, PL 113-128, STAT. 1634.
