Medicaid Home and Community-Based Services (HCBS) 1915(c) waivers are one of the largest providers of long-term services and supports for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD). HCBS waivers also play a prominent role in providing day habilitation services for people with IDD. The purpose of this study was to examine how HCBS waivers allocate day habilitation services for people with IDD. HCBS waivers providing day habilitation services for people with IDD were analyzed to determine service utilization and projected expenditures. In fiscal year 2014, HCBS waivers projected US$5.62 billion of funding for day habilitation services; however, there was wide variance across services in terms of projected total spending, spending per participant, and reimbursement rates.
AndersonK. A.Dabelko-SchoenyH.JohnsonT. D. (2013). The state of adult day services findings and implications from the MetLife National Study of Adult Day Services. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 32, 729-748. doi:10.1177/0733464812447284
2.
BeyerS.BrownT.AkandiR.RapleyM. (2010). A comparison of quality of life outcomes for people with intellectual disabilities in supported employment, day services and employment enterprises. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 23, 290-295. doi:10.1111/j.1468-3148.2009.00534.x
3.
BraddockD.HempR.RizzoloM. C.TanisE. S.HafferL.WuJ. (2015). The state of the states in intellectual and developmental disabilities: Emerging from the great recession. Washington, DC: The American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.
4.
ButterworthJ.WinsorJ.SmithF.MiglioreA.DominD.TimmonsJ. C.HallA. C. (2015). StateData: The national report on employment services and outcomes. Boston, MA: Institute for Community Inclusion.
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. (2014b). Medicaid program; State plan home and community-based services, 5-year period for waivers, provider payment reassignment, and home and community-based setting requirements for community first choice and home and community-based services (HCBS) waivers. Federal Register, 79, 2947-3039.
8.
ConroyJ. W.FerrisC. S.IrvineR. (2010). Microenterprise options for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities: An outcome evaluation. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 7, 269-277. doi:10.1111/j.1741-1130.2010.00276.x
9.
Disabled and Elderly Health Programs Group, Center for Medicaid and State Operations, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, & Department of Health and Human Services. (2015, January). Application for a §1915(c) Home and Community-Based Waiver [Version 3.5]: Instructions, technical guide, and review criteria. Retrieved from http://www.medicaid.gov/Medicaid-CHIP-Program-Information/By-Topics/Waivers/Downloads/Technical-Guidance.pdf
10.
DwyerL. L.Harris-KojetinL. D.ValverdeR. H. (2014). Differences in adult day services center characteristics by center ownership: United States, 2012 (NCHS Data Brief No. 165). Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics.
11.
FemiaE. E.ZaritS. H.StephensM. A. P.GreeneR. (2007). Impact of adult day services on behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia. The Gerontologist, 47, 775-788. doi:10.1093/geront/47.6.775
12.
FriedmanC. (in press). Outdated language: Use of “mental retardation” in Medicaid HCBS waivers post-Rosa’s Law. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.
13.
FriedmanC.LulinskiA.RizzoloM. C. (2015). Mental/behavioral health services: Medicaid Home and Community-Based Services 1915(c) waiver allocation for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Intellectual and developmental disabilities, 53, 257-270. doi:10.1352/1934-9556-53.4.257
14.
FriedmanC.RizzoloM. C. (2015). 2014: An analysis of state-by-state HCBS waivers for persons with intellectual disabilities. Chicago: University of Illinois at Chicago.
15.
FriedmanC.RizzoloM. C. (2016). The state of transportation for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities in Medicaid Home and Community-Based Services 1915(c) waivers. Journal of Disability Policy Studies. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1044207316644413
16.
FriedmanC.RizzoloM. C. (in press). “Get us real jobs”: Supported employment services for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities in Medicaid Home and Community Based Services waivers. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation.
17.
FriedmanC.RizzoloM. C.SchindlerA. (2014). Dental services: A nationwide study of Medicaid Home and Community-Based Services (HCBS) waiver service allocation. Inclusion, 2(1), 17-36. doi:10.1352/2326-6988-2.1.17
18.
HallA. C.KramerJ. (2009). Social capital through workplace connections: Opportunities for workers with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Social Work in Disability & Rehabilitation, 8, 146-170. doi:10.1080/15367100903200452
19.
HempR.BraddockD.KingM. (2014). Community-based Medicaid funding for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities. National Conference of State Legislatures LegisBrief, 22(7), 1-2.
20.
KellyR.PuurveenG.GillR. (2016). The effect of adult day services on delay to institutional placement. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 35(8), 814-835. doi:10.1177/0733464814521319
21.
LakinK. C.LarsonS. A.KimS. (2011). Behavioral outcomes of deinstitutionalization for people with intellectual and/or developmental disabilities: Third decennial review of U.S. studies, 1977-2010. Policy Research Brief, 21(2), 1-11. Retrieved from https://ici.umn.edu/products/prb/212/212.pdf
22.
LarsonS. A.LakinK. C. (1989). Deinstitutionalization of persons with mental retardation: Behavioral outcomes. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 14, 324-332. doi:10.1177/154079698901400411
23.
LingwoodL. (2005, December-2006, January). Modernising day services. Mental Health Today, pp. 33-36.
24.
MankD.CioffiA.YovanoffP. (2003). Supported employment outcomes across a decade: Is there evidence of improvement in the quality of implementation?Mental Retardation, 41, 188-197. doi:10.1352/0047-6765(2003)41<188:SEOAAD>2.0.CO;2
25.
MansellJ.Beadle-BrownJ. (2004). Person-centred planning or person-centred action? Policy and practice in intellectual disability services. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 17, 1-9. doi:10.1111/j.1468-3148.2004.00175.x
26.
MiglioreA.MankD.GrossiT.RoganP. (2007). Integrated employment or sheltered workshops: Preferences of adults with intellectual disabilities, their families, and staff. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 26(5), 5-19.
27.
MurphyS. T.RoganP. M.HandleyM.KincaidC.Royce-DavisJ. (2002). People’s situations and perspectives eight years after workshop conversion. Mental Retardation, 40, 30-40. doi:10.1352/0047-6765(2002)040<0030:PSSAPE>2.0.CO;2
28.
NordD.HoffD. (2014, March). Policy research brief: Employment first across the nation—Progress on the policy front. Policy Research Brief, 24(1). Retrieved from http://rtc.umn.edu/prb/214/
29.
Parker HarrisS.RenkoM.CaldwellK. (2013). Accessing social entrepreneurship: Perspectives of people with disabilities and key stakeholders. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 38, 35-48.
30.
Parker HarrisS.RenkoM.CaldwellK. (2014). Social entrepreneurship as an employment pathway for people with disabilities: Exploring political–economic and socio-cultural factors. Disability & Society, 29, 1275-1290. doi:10.1080/09687599.2014.924904
31.
PattonM. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Saint Paul, MN: SAGE.
32.
PeeblesV.BohlA. (2014). The HCBS taxonomy: A new language for classifying home-and community-based services. Medicare & Medicaid Research Review, 4(3), 1-17. doi:10.5600/mmrr.004.03.b01
33.
RizzoloM. C.FriedmanC.Lulinski-NorrisA.BraddockD. (2013). Home and Community Based Services (HCBS) waivers: A nationwide study of the states. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 51(1), 1-21. doi:10.1352/1934-9556-51.01.001
34.
RoganP.RinneS. (2011). National call for organizational change from sheltered to integrated employment. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 49, 248-260.
35.
Rosa’s Law, Pub. L. No. 111-256,124 Stat. 2643 (2010).
36.
SchurL.KruseD.BlasiJ.BlankP. (2009). Is disability disabling in all workplaces? Workplace disparities and corporate culture. Industrial Relations, 48, 381-409. doi:10.1111/j.1468-232x.2009.00565.x
SulewskiJ. S.ButterworthJ.GilmoreD. S. (2006). Research to practice: Community-based non-work services: Findings from the National Survey of Day and Employment Programs for People With Developmental Disabilities. Boston, MA: Institute for Community Inclusion. Retrieved from http://scholarworks.umb.edu/ici_researchtopractice/9
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2000). Understanding Medicaid home and community services: A primer. Washington, DC: Author.
41.
van der PuttenA.VlaskampC. (2011). Day services for people with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities: An analysis of thematically organized activities. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 8, 10-17. doi:10.1111/j.1741-1130.2011.00282.x
42.
WallaceA. (2014). Creating innovative day habilitation service delivery for people with disabilities: Centers for Excellence creative arts and curriculum based program model (Unpublished master’s thesis). Utica College, NY.
43.
ZaritS. H.KimK.FemiaE. E.AlmeidaD. M.KleinL. C. (2013). The effects of adult day services on family caregivers’ daily stress, affect, and health: Outcomes from the Daily Stress and Health (DaSH) study. The Gerontologist, 54, 570-579. doi:10.1093/geront/gnt045
