This study examined the rate at which applicants to Vocational Rehabilitation (VR) were denied services because their disabilities were “too severe.” It found that, from 2002 to 2012, 1.7% of all VR applicants throughout the United States were denied services because of the nature of their impairments. In addition, over this period, the number of VR applicants who were denied gradually declined. However, individuals who had cognitive impairments made up a larger proportion of the denied group over time while individuals who had physical disabilities made up a smaller proportion. Finally, although rates varied widely among states, most states (i.e., 34) were decreasing the use of “too disabled” as a means of denying services.
BayntonD. C. (2011). These pushful days: Time and disability in the age of eugenics. Health and History, 13, 43-64.
2.
BraddockD.HempR.RizzoloM. C. (2008). The state of the states in developmental disabilities: 2008. Boulder, CO: Department of Psychiatry, Coleman Institute for Cognitive Disabilities, University of Colorado.
3.
BraddockD. L.ParishS. L. (2001). An institutional history of disability. In AlbrechtG. L.SeelmanK. D.BuryM. (Eds.), Handbook of disability studies (pp. 11-68). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
4.
BrownL.BellamyT.PerlmutterL.SackowitzP.SontagE. (1972). The development of quality, quantity, and durability in the work performance of retarded students in a public school prevocational workshop. Training School Bulletin, 68, 58-69.
5.
BrownL.PearceE. (1970). Increasing the production rates of trainable retarded students in public school simulated workshops. Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded, 5, 15-22.
6.
ButterworthJ.HallA. C.SmithF. A.MiglioreA.WinsorJ. (2013). StateData: The national report on employment services and outcomes. Boston: Institute for Community Inclusion, University of Massachusetts, Boston.
7.
CareyA. C. (2010). A relational approach to the development of civil rights for people with intellectual disabilities. Research in Social Science and Disability, 5, 103-129.
8.
CuvoA. J.LeafR. B.BorakoveL. S. (1978). Teaching janitorial skills to the mentally retarded: Acquisition, generalization, and maintenance. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 345-355.
9.
GoldM. W. (1972). Stimulus factors in skill training of the retarded on a complex assembly task: Acquisition, transfer, and retention. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 76, 517-526.
10.
GoldM. W. (1976). Task analysis of a complex assembly task by the retarded blind. Exceptional Children, 43, 78-84.
11.
KatzS.GoldbergJ.ShurkaE. (1977). The use of operant techniques in teaching severely retarded clients work habits. Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded, 12, 14-21.
12.
O’NeillC. T.BellamyG. T. (1978). Evaluation of a procedure for teaching saw chain assembly to a severely retarded woman. Mental Retardation, 16, 37-41.
13.
RuschF. R.BraddockD. (2004). Adult Day Programs versus Supported Employment (1988-2002): Spending and service practices of mental retardation and developmental disabilities state agencies. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 29, 237-242.
14.
RuschF. R.HughesC. (1990). Historical overview of supported employment. In RuschF. R. (Ed.), Supported employment: Models, methods and issues (pp. 5-14). Sycamore, IL: Sycamore Publishing.
15.
SipersteinG. N.ParkerR. C.DrascherM. (2013). National snapshot of adults with intellectual disabilities in the labor force. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 39, 157-165.
16.
TrentJ. W. (1993). To cut and control: Institutional preservation and the sterilization of mentally retarded people in the United States, 1892-1947. Journal of Historical Sociology, 6, 56-73.
17.
TyorP. L.BellL. V. (1984). Caring for the retarded in America: A history. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
