This study documented the process of developing and validating the Family Needs Assessment (FNA), a seven-factor 73-item measure developed for research and practice, using a sample of Taiwanese families. In developing the FNA, the research team identified a theoretical basis for family needs, used literature and qualitative results in generating items, ensured culturally and linguistically accurate translation of the measure, and revised the measure based on results from pilot tests and cognitive interviews. Although a confirmatory factor analysis is necessary to support final validity, results from this study provide a foundation for understanding Taiwanese family needs. According to the results, the domains with highest needs are Hope (i.e., anticipating and achieving positive outcomes) and Disability-Related Services (i.e., getting services and teaching the child with disabilities). Findings from this study indicate that the FNA, developed as a comprehensive, contemporary, accessible, and culturally appropriate tool, can contribute to the disability-related field in research and practice.
AhmadiA.SharifiE.ZalaniH. A.BoloukS., & AmraiK. (2011). The needs of Iranian families of children with autism spectrum disorder, cross-cultural study. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 321–326. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.03.094
2.
AlmasriN.PalisanoR. J.DunstC.ChiarelloL. A.O'NeilM. E., & PolanskyM. (2012). Profiles of family needs of children and youth with cerebral palsy. Child: Care, Health and Development, 38(6), 798–806.
3.
BaileyD. B., & BlascoP. M. (1990). Parents' perspectives on a written survey of family needs. Journal of Early Intervention, 14, 196–203.
4.
BaileyD. B.SkinnerD.CorreaV.ArciaE.Reyes-BlanesM. E.RodriguezP. (1999). Needs and supports reported by Latino families of young children with developmental disabilities. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 104, 437–451.
5.
BeatonD. E.BombardierC.GuilleminF., & FerrazM. B. (2000). Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine, 25, 3186–3191.
6.
BeattyP. C., & WillisG. B. (2007). Research synthesis: The practice of cognitive interviewing. Public Opinion Quarterly, 71, 287–311. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfm006
7.
BrothersonM. J.SummersJ. A.NaigL. A.KyzarK.FriendA.EpleyP. (2010). Partnership patterns: Addressing emotional needs in early intervention. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 30, 32–45. doi: 10.1177/0271121409360068
8.
Burton-SmithR.McVillyK. R.YazbeckM.ParmenterT. R., & TsutsuiT. (2009). Service and support needs of Australian carers supporting a family member with disability at home. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 34, 239–247. doi: 10.1080/13668250903103668
9.
ChanS., & ChenD. (2011). Families with Asian roots. In LynchE. W. & HansonM. J. (Eds.), Developing cross-cultural competence: A guide for working with young children and their families (4th ed., pp. 234–318). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing.
10.
ChanS., & LeeE. (2004). Families with Asian roots. In LynchE. W. & HansonM. J. (Eds.), Developing cross-cultural competence: A guide for working with children and their families (pp. 219–298). Baltimore: Brookes Publishing.
11.
ChenW., & SunS. (2008). [A survey of family needs and family supports for families of elementary students with intellectual disabilities in self-contain classroom], 33, 55–75.
12.
ChiuC.KyzarK.ZunaN.TurnbullA.SummersJ. A., & GomezV. A. (2013). Family quality of life. In WehmeyerM. L. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of positive psychology and disability (pp. 365–392). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
13.
ChouY. C.LeeY. C.LinL. C.KrögerT., & ChangA. N. (2009). Older and younger family caregivers of adults with intellectual disability: Factors associated with future plans. Journal Information, 47, 282–294.
14.
ComreyA. L., & LeeH. B. (1992). A first course in factor analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.
15.
CreswellJ. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
16.
Department of Statistics at Ministry of Interior. (2012). 101 (Social welfare for people with disabilities in the first half of 2012). Retrieved from http://sowf.moi.gov.tw/stat/week/week10134.doc.
17.
DeVellisR. F. (2012). Scale development: Theory and applications (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
18.
DillmanD. A.SmythJ. D., & ChristianL. M. (2009). Internet, mail and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method (3rd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: J. Wiley & Sons, Inc.
19.
EpleyP.SummersJ. A., & TurnbullA. P. (2011). Family outcomes of early intervention: Families' perceptions of need, services, and outcomes. Journal of Early Intervention, 33, 201–219. doi: 10.1177/1053815111425929
20.
FowlerF. J. (1995). Improving survey questions: Design and evaluation. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
21.
FreedmanR. I., & BoyerN. C. (2000). The power to choose: Supports for families caring for individuals with developmental disabilities. Health & Social Work, 25, 59–68.
GreensteinT. N., & DavisS. N. (2012). Methods of family research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24.
GrotevantH. D., & CarlsonC. I. (1989). Family assessment, a guide to methods and measures. New York: Guilford Press.
25.
GuC. F.ChenY. H.WangR.CaoY.MuG., & LiY. Y. (2010). 0–7 [Needs of families with children with disabilities in Beijing]. Chinese Journal of Special Education, 124, 7–12.
26.
HoffmanL.MarquisJ.PostonD.SummersJ. A., & TurnbullA. P. (2006). Assessing family outcomes: Psychometric evaluation of the Beach Center Family Quality of Life Scale. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68, 1069–1083.
27.
HsuS., & LinP. (2008). [The study of family stress events and family support service needs]. Providence Studies on Humanities and Social Sciences, 2, 1–26.
28.
HuX.WangM., & FeiX. (2012). Family quality of life of Chinese families of children with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 56, 30–44. doi: 10.1111/j.1365–2788.2011.01391.x
29.
LinY. Q.QinW., & ZhangF. J. (2007). [Needs of parents who have children with autism in rehabilitation agencies in Chongqin]. Chinese Journal of Special Education, 90, 51–59.
30.
LlewellynG.McConnellD., & ByeR. (1998). Perception of service needs by parents with intellectual disability, their significant others and their service workers. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 19, 245–260.
31.
McCabeH. (2008). The importance of parent-to-parent support among families of children with autism in the People's Republic of China. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 55, 303–314. doi: 10.1080/10349120802489471
32.
McConnellD.LlewellynG., & ByeR. (1997). Providing services for parents with intellectual disability: Parent needs and service constraints. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 22, 5–17. doi: 10.1080/13668259700033251
33.
McGrewK. S.GilmanC. J., & JohnsonS. (1992). A review of scales to assess family needs. Journal of Pyschoeducational Assessment, 10, 4–25.
MurrayM. A. (1959). Needs of parents of mentally retarded children. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 63, 1078–1088.
36.
PalisanoR. J.AlmarsiN.ChiarelloL. A.OrlinM. N.BagleyA., & MaggsJ. (2010). Family needs of parents of children and youth with cerebral palsy. Child: Care, Health, and Development, 36, 85–92. doi: 10.1111/j.1365–2214.2009.01030.x
37.
People with Disabilities Rights Protection Act. (2011).
38.
Protection of Children and Youths Welfare and Rights Act. (2012).
39.
RedmondB., & RishardsonV. (2003). Just getting on with it: Exploring the service needs of mothers who care for young children with severe/profound and life-threatening intellectual disability. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 16, 205–218.
40.
Regulations of Services for Family Caregivers of Individuals with Disabilities. (2012).
41.
Reyes-BlanesM. E.CorreaV., & BaileyD. (1999). Perceived needs of and support for Puerto Rican mothers of young children with disabilities. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 19, 54–63.
42.
SalkindN. J., & GreenS. B. (2011). Using SPSS for Windows and Macintosh: Analyzing and understanding data (6th ed.). Boston: Prentice Hall.
43.
SamuelP. S.HobdenK. L.LeRoyB. W., & LaceyK. K. (2012). Analysing family service needs of typically under-served families in the USA. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 56, 111–128. doi: 10.1111/j.1365–2788.2011.01481.x
44.
SextonD.SnyderP.RheamsR.Barron-SharpB., & PerezJ. (1991). Considerations in using written surveys to identify family strengths and needs during the IFSP process. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 11, 81–91.
45.
SnyderB., & KeefeK. (1985). The unmet needs of family caregivers for frail and disabled adult. Social Work in Health Care, 10, 1–14.
46.
TabachnickB. G., & FidellL. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
47.
TasséM. J., & CraigE. M. (1999). Critical issues in the cross-cultural assessment of adaptive behavior. In SchalockR. L. (Ed.), Adaptive behavior and its measurement: Implications for the field of mental retardation (pp. 161–184). Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Retardation.
48.
TsaiI., & HoM. (2010). An institutionalist explanation of the evolution of Taiwan's disability movement: From the charity model to the social model. Journal of Current Chinese Affairs, 39, 87–123.
49.
TurnbullA. P.SummersJ. A.LeeS. H., & KyzarK. (2007). Conceptualization and measurement of family outcomes associated with families of individuals with intellectual disabilities. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 13, 346–356. doi: 10.1002/mrdd.20174
50.
TurnbullA. P.TurnbullH. R.AgostaJ.ErwinE. J.FujiuraG.SingerG. H. S. (2005). Support of families and family life across the lifespan. In LakinC. & TurnbullA. P. (Eds.), National goals and research for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities (pp. 217–256). Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Retardation.
51.
TurnbullH. R.BeegleG., & StoweM. J. (2001). The core concepts of disability policy affecting families who have children with disabilities. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 12, 133–143. doi: 10.1177/104420730101200302
52.
TurnbullH. R., & StoweM. J. (2001). A taxonomy for organizing the core concepts according to their underlying principles. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 12, 177–197. doi: 10.1177/104420730101200304
53.
WalshF. (2011). Normal family processes: Growing diversity and complexity. Guilford Press.
54.
WangT. (1993). A study on needs of families of children with cognitive and developmental delays. 9, 73–90.
