This study investigated the frequency of community participation and level of assistance needed to perform domestic and safety skills for individuals with severe disabilities who live successfully in the community, based on type of residence and hours of in-home support provided. Participants included residential specialists from small community residences (i.e., eight or less residents) in 26 states who had experience delivering residential services to adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Surveys were mailed to 1,000 residential specialists using a random proportional stratified sampling procedure; 280 completed surveys were used for data analysis. Residential specialists who work at supported apartments indicated that individuals with severe disabilities needed less assistance performing domestic and safety skills and participated more frequently in community activities than residential specialists who worked at group homes Residential specialists who provided less than 20 hours of in-home support per week also indicated individuals with severe disabilities needed less assistance performing domestic and safety skills and participated more frequently in community activities than residential specialists who provided 20 hours or more of in-home support. The findings suggest that the philosophy of supported living has not been fully realized. Flexible systems must be developed for individuals with severe disabilities that respond to their changing needs and preferences
BaerR. M., & DavisoA. W. (2007). Independent living and community participation. In FlexerR. W., BaerR., LuftP., & SimmonsT. J. (Eds.), Transition planning for secondary students with disabilities (pp. 290–314). Columbus, OH: Merrill.
2.
BartlettJ. E., KotrlikJ. W., & HigginsC. (2001). Organizational research: Determining appropriate sample size for survey research.Information Technology, Learning, and Performance Journal,19, 43–50.
BraddockD., HempR., ParishS., & RizzoloM. C. (2000). Growth in state commitments for community services: Significance of the medicaid home and community-based services waiver.Mental Retardation,38, 186–189.
5.
BruininksR., ChenT., LakinC., & McGrewK. (1992). Components of personal competence and community integration for persons with mental retardation in small residential programs.Research in Developmental Disabilities,13, 463–479.
6.
ChurchA. H. (1993). Estimating the effect of incentives on mail survey response rates: A meta-analysis.Public Opinion Quarterly,57, 62–79.
7.
CochranW. G. (1977). Sampling techniques (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Wiley.
8.
CzajaR., & BlairJ. (2005). Designing surveys: A guide to decisions and procedures (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks. CA: Pine Forge Press.
9.
DukerP. C., BoonekampJ., BrummelhuisY. T., HendrixY., HermansM., LeeuweJ. V., & SeysD. (1989). Analysis of ward staff initiatives towards mentally retarded residents: Clues for intervention.Journal of Mental Deficiency Research,33, 55–67.
10.
EmersonE., RobertsonJ., GregoryN., HattonC., KessissoglouS., HallamA., & WalshP. (2001). Quality and costs of supported living residences and group homes in the United Kingdom.American Journal of Mental Retardation,106, 401–415.
11.
EversonJ. M., & TrowbridgeM. H. (2011). Preparing students with low incidence disabilities for community living opportunities. In KaufmannJ. M., & HallahanD. P. (Eds.). Handbook of special education (pp. 624–636). New York, NY: Routledge.
12.
FelceD., & EmersonE. (2001). Living with support in a home in the community: Predictors of behavioral development and household and community activity.Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 7, 75–83.
13.
FelceD., & PerryJ. (1995). The extent of support for ordinary living provided in staffed housing: The relationships between staffing levels, resident dependency, staff-resident interactions and resident activity patterns.Social Science and Medicine,40, 799–810.
14.
FelceD., PerryJ., RomeoR., RobertsonJ., EmersonE., & KnappM. (2008). Outcomes and costs of community living: Semi-independent living and fully staffed group homes.American Journal on Mental Retardation,113, 87–101.
15.
FoxR. J., CraskM. R., & KimJ. (1988). Mail survey response rate: A meta-analysis of selected techniques for inducing response.Public Opinion Quarterly,52, 467–491.
16.
FurseD., & StewartD. (1982). Monetary incentives versus promised contribution to charity: New evidence on mail survey response.Journal of Marketing Research,19, 375–380.
17.
HarchikA. E., & CampbellA. R. (1998). Supporting people with developmental disabilities in their homes in the community.Journal of Organizational Behavior Management,18, 83–101.
18.
HasaziS. B., GordonL. R., & RoeC. A. (1985). Factors associated with the employment status of handicapped youth exiting high school 1979–1983.Exceptional Children,51, 455–469.
19.
HoweJ., HornerR. H., & NewtonJ. S.. (1998). Comparison of supported living and traditional residential services in the state of Oregon.Mental Retardation,36, 1–11.
20.
HughesC., & CarterE. W. (2000). The transition handbook: Strategies high school teachers use that work!Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
21.
JamesJ., & BolsteinR. (1990). The effect of monetary incentives and follow-up mailings on the response rate and responsive quality in mail surveys.Public Opinion Quarterly,54, 346–361.
22.
JobberD., & SaundersJ. (1988). Modeling the effects of prepaid monetary incentives on mail-survey response.Journal of the Operational Research Society,39, 365–372.
23.
JonesE., PerryJ., LoweK., FelceD., ToogoodS., DunstanF., & PaglerJ. (1999). Opportunity and the promotion of activity among adults with severe intellectual disability living in community residences: The impact of training staff in active support.Journal of Intellectual Disability Research,43, 164–178.
24.
KaplowitzM. D., HadlockT. D., & LevineR. (2004). A comparison of web and mail survey response rates.Public Opinion Quarterly,68, 98–101.
25.
KimR. K., & DymondS. K. (2011). Comparison of recreation and leisure activities in supported apartments and group homes.Journal of Special Education: Theory and Practice (South Korea),12, 29–47.
26.
KnollJ. A., & WheelerC. B.. (2005). My home and community: Developing supports for adult living. In FlexerR. W., SimmonsT. J., LuftP., & BaerR. M. (Eds.), Transition planning for secondary students with disabilities (pp. 424–459). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education. Inc.
27.
KozmaA., MansellJ., & Beadle-BrownJ. (2009). Outcomes in different residential settings for people with intellectual disability: A systematic review.American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities,114, 193–222.
28.
MansellJ. (2006). Deinstitutionalisation and community living: Progress, problems and priorities.Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability.31, 65–76.
29.
McConkeyR. (2007). Variations in the social inclusion of people with intellectual disabilities in supported living schemes and residential settings.Journal of Intellectual Disability Research,51, 207–217.
30.
McDonnellJ., HardmanM., & McDonnellA. (2003). An introduction to persons with moderate and severe disabilities.Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
31.
NirjeB. (1969). The normalization principle and its human management implications. In KugelR., & WolfensbergerW. (Eds.), Changing patterns in residential services for the mentally retarded (pp. 181–195). Washington. DC: President's Committee on Mental Retardation.
32.
NunnallyJ. (1978). Psychometric theory.New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
33.
O'BrienJ. (1994). Down stairs that are never your own: Supporting people with developmental disabilities in their own homes.Mental Retardation,32, 1–6.
34.
O'BrienJ., & O'BrienL. C. (1994). More than just a new address: Images of organization for supported living agencies. In BradleyV. J., AshbaughJ. W., & BlaneyB. C. (Eds.), Creating individual supports for people with developmental disabilities (pp. 109–140). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
35.
ProutyR., SmithG., & LakinK. C. (2003). Residential services for persons with developmental disabilities: Status and trends through 2002.Minneapolis: Research and Training Center on Community Living, Institute on Community Integration, University of Minnesota.
36.
RacinoJ. A. (1995). Community living for adults with developmental disabilities: A housing and support approach.Journal of the Association for Persons With Severe Handicaps,20, 300–310.
37.
RacinoJ. A. (2000). Personnel preparation in disability and community life: Toward universal approaches to support.Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
38.
RäikkönenO., PeräläM.-L., & KahanpääA. (2007). Staffing adequacy, supervisory support and quality of care in long-term care settings: Staff perceptions.Journal of Advanced Nursing,60. 615–626.
39.
RetherfordR. A. (1975). Selected characteristics of foster parents and acceptance of the post-institutional retardate into the family structure.Dissertation Abstracts International, 35.42–89.
SingerE., GrovesR. M., & CorningA. D. (1999). Differential incentives: Beliefs about practices, perceptions of equity and effects on survey participation.Public Opinion Quarterly.63.251–260.
42.
StancliffeR. J., & KeaneS. (2000). Outcomes and costs of community living: A matched comparison of group homes and semi-independent living.Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability,25, 281–305.
43.
TaylorS. J. (1988). Caught in the continuum: A critical analysis of the principle of the least restrictive environment.Journal of the Association for Persons With Severe Handicaps, 13, 45–53.
44.
TestD. W., AspelN. P., & EversonJ. M. (2006). Transition methods for youth with disabilities.Columbus, OH: Merrill.
45.
ThompsonJ. R., HughesC., SchalockR. L., SilvermanW., TasseM. J., BryantB., & CampbellE. M. (2002). Integrating supports in assessment and planning.Mental Retardation,40, 390–405.
46.
TzengH. M. (2004). Nurses’ self assessment of their nursing, competencies, job demands and job performance in Taiwan hospital system.International Journal of Nursing Studies,41, 487–496.
