The impact of TASH over the next decade will be affected by decisions about the precision and consistency of the organization's messages to the field. TASH has long been the premier organization extending the voice of individuals with significant developmental disabilities. As TASH examines the themes that will be prominent in the coming years, we advocate a consistent focus on (a) qualify of life and (b) evidence-based practices.
DunlapG., StrainP., & FoxL. (in press). Positive behavior support and young people with autism: Strategies of prevention and intervention. In KellyB., & PerkinsD. F. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of implementation science for educational psychology.New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
2.
FixsenD. L., NaoomS. F., BlaseK. A., FriedmanR. M., & WallaceF. (2005). Implementation research: A synthesis of the literature.Tampa, FL: Florida Mental Health Institute, University of South Florida.
3.
FreemanR., EberL., AndersonC., IrvinL., HornerR., BoundsM., & DunlapG. (2006). Building inclusive school cultures using school-wide PBS: Designing effective individual support systems for students with significant disabilities.Research and Practice in Severe Disabilities,31, 4–17.
4.
FuchsD., FuchsL., & ComptonD. (2004). Identifying reading disability by responsiveness-to-instruction. Specifying measures and criteria.Learning Disability Quarterly,27, 216–227.
5.
FuchsD., FuchsL., & ComptonD. (2012). Smart RTI: A next-generation approach to multilevel prevention.Exceptional Children,78, 263–279.
6.
GuessD., HelmstetterE., TurnbullH. R., & KnowltonS. (1987). Use of aversive procedures with persons who are disabled: An historical review and critical analysis.Seattle, WA: The Association for Persons With Severe Handicaps.
7.
JimenezB., BrowderD., SpoonerF., & DiBiaseW. (2012). Inclusive inquiry science using peer-mediated embedded instruction for students with moderate intellectual disability.Exceptional Children,78, 301–317.
8.
MeyerL. H., PeckC. A., & BrownL. (Eds.) (1991). Critical issues in the lives of people with severe disabilities.Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
9.
PeckC. A. (1991). Linking values and science in social policy decisions affecting citizens with severe disabilities. In MeyerL. H., PeckC. A., & BrownL. (Eds.), Critical issues in the lives of people with severe disabilities (pp. 1–15). Baltimore. MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
10.
SailorW., DoolittleJ., BradleyR., & DanielsonL. (2009). Response to intervention and positive behavior support. In SailorW., DunlapG., SugaiG., & HornerR. H. (Eds.), Handbook of positive behavior support (pp. 729–753). New York, NY: Springer.
11.
SchalockR. L., AlonsoM. A. V., & BraddockD. L. (2002). Handbook on quality of life for human service practitioners.Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Retardation.
12.
ShavelsonR., & TowneL. (2002). Scientific research in education.Washington. DC: National Academy Press.
13.
SnellM. (1993). Instruction of students with severe disabilities (4th ed., pp. 184–214). Columbus, OH: Merrill.
14.
SnellM., & BrownF. (2010). Instruction of students with severe disabilities (7th ed., pp. 257–299). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.
15.
SpoonerF., KnightV., BrowderD., JimenezB. A., & DiBiaseW. (2011). Evaluating evidence-based practices in teaching science content to students with severe developmental disabilities.Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities.36, 62–75.
16.
SugaiG., & HornerR. H. (2009). Defining and describing schoolwide positive behavior support. In SailorW., DunlapG., SugaiG., & HornerR. H. (Eds.), Handbook of positive behavior support (pp. 307–326). New York, NY: Springer.
