Restricted accessArticle commentaryFirst published online 2006-12
Access,Participation,and Progress in the General Education Curriculum in the Least Restrictive Environment for Students with Significant Cognitive Disabilities
ArtilesA. J. (2000). The inclusive education movement & minority representation in special education: Trends, paradoxes and dilemmas. Keynote paper presented at International Special Education Conference 2000. Manchester, England. Retrieved from http://www.isec2000.org.uk/.
3.
BanksJ. A. (2001). Multicultural education: Characteristics and goals. In BanksJ. A.BanksC. A. M. (Eds.), Multicultural education: Issues and perspectives (4th ed., pp. 3–30). New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
4.
BiklenD.LehrS.SearlS. J.TaylorS. J. (1987). Purposeful integration… inherently equal. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University, Center on Human Policy.
5.
BogdanR.BiklenD., Producers (1976). Handicapism [A slide tape presentation]. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University, Center on Human Policy.
6.
BrantlingerE. A. (2001). Poverty, class, and disability: A historical, social, and political perspective. Focus on Exceptional Children, 33, 1–24.
7.
BrowderD. M.SpoonerF.WakemanS.TrelaK.BakerJ. N. (2006). Aligning instruction with academic content standards: Finding the link. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 31, 309–321.
8.
BrownL.WilcoxB.SontagE.VincentB.DoddN.GruenewaldL. (1977). Toward the realization of the least restrictive educational environments for severely handicapped students. AAESPH Review, 2, 195–201.
9.
Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U. S. 483 (1954).
10.
ButlerJ. E. (2001). Transforming the curriculum: Teaching about women of color. In BanksJ. A.BanksC. A. M. (Eds.), Multicultural education: Issues and perspectives (4th ed., pp. 174–193). New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
11.
CarterE. W.KennedyC. H. (2006). Promoting access to the general curriculum using peer support strategies. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 31, 284–292.
12.
DunnL. (1968). Special education for the mildly retarded, is much of it justifiable?Exceptional Children, 35, 5–22.
13.
DymondS. K.RenzagliaA.RosensteinA.ChunE. J.BanksR. A.NiswanderV. (2006). Using a participatory action research approach to create a universally designed inclusive high school science course: A case study. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 31, 293–308.
14.
Education of All Handicapped Children Act. Public Law 94-142. (1975).
15.
Elementary and Secondary School Act. Public Law 89-10. (1965, April 11).
16.
FergusonD. L.KozleskiE.SmithA. (2001). On… transformed, inclusive schools: A framework to guide fundamental change in urban schools. Newton, MA: National Institute for Urban Improvement.
17.
GilhoolT. (1989). The right to an effective education: From Brown to P.L. 94-142 and beyond. In LipskyD. K.GartnerA. (Eds.), Beyond separate education: Quality education for all (pp. 243–253). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
18.
Goals 2000: Educate America Act. Public Law 103–227. (1994, March 31).
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Amendments of 1997, PL 105-17, 20 U.S.C. ŝ1400 et seq.
21.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, PL 108-466, 20 U. S. C. ŝ1400, H. R. 1350.
22.
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-110, 115 Stat. 1425 (2002).
23.
P.A.R.C v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, 334 F. Supp. 1257 (E.D. Pa. 1971).
24.
PILCOP Newsletter. (2004, Spring). Philadelphia: Public Interest Law Center of Philadelphia.
25.
RizviF.LingardB. (1996). Disability, education and the discourses of justice. In ChristensenC.RizviF. (Eds.), Disability, human rights, and education: Cross cultural perspectives (pp. 119–131). Philadelphia: Open University Press.
26.
SmithA. (2001). A faceless bureaucrat ponders special education, disability, and white privilege. The Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 26, 180–188.
27.
SpringJ. (1993). Conflicts of interests: The politics of American education. New York: Longman.
28.
WaltonR. (2006, November 15). Posny: RTI, a general education initiative has potential for all students. Paper presented at National Association of State Directors of Special Education 69th Annual Conference and Business Meeting, Williamsburg, VA, LRP Publications.
29.
WillM. (1986). Educating students with learning problems–A shared responsibility. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services.
30.
WolfensbergerW. (1980). Research, empiricism, and the principle of normalization. In FlynnR. J.NitschK. E. (Eds.), Normalization, social integration, and community services. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.
31.
WolfensbergerW. (1983). Social role valorization: A proposed new term for the principle of normalization. Mental Retardation, 21, 234–239.
32.
WolfensbergerW. (2000). A brief overview of social role valorization. Mental Retardation, 38, 105–123.