Hispanic Diabetes Peer Facilitator Training Needs and Connections to Hispanics With Type 2 Diabetes

Abstract

Introduction: There is a gap in the literature on the role of Hispanic peer facilitators (PFs) in online peer-support communities for Hispanics with diabetes. This paper explores bilingual Hispanic PFs’ training experiences and their perspectives on their role in a continuous glucose monitoring and online peer support intervention for people with type 2 diabetes. Methods: We conducted semi-structured interviews with five PFs. A three-stage triangulation of qualitative data using inductive and deductive reasoning was used for the data analysis. Results: We grouped emerging themes into three categories: (a) technical and practical training needs and experiences, (b) building connections through shared diabetes experience, and (c) challenges and benefits of being a PF, such as helplessness, to further support participants and find motivation for their diabetes management. Conclusion: Successful peer facilitation requires more than technical knowledge. PFs need additional communication skills and psychosocial training on diabetes distress, anxiety, and depression. PFs may derive personal benefits in managing their own diabetes and making positive lifestyle changes from participating in an online peer support community.

Keywords

chronicity-diabetes mellitus type 2 coaching peer connector Latin cultures online

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American Diabetes Association (2018). Lifestyle management: Standards of medical care in diabetes-2018. Diabetes Care, 41(Suppl 1), S38–S50. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc18-S004

Avilés-Santa

M. L.

Hsu

L. L.

Arredondo

Menke

Werner

Thyagarajan

Heiss

Teng

Schneiderman

Giachello

A. L.

Gallo

L. C.

Talavera

G. A.

Cowie

C. C.

(2016). Differences in hemoglobin A1c between Hispanics/Latinos and non-Hispanic Whites: An analysis of the Hispanic community health study/study of Latinos and the 2007–2012 national health and nutrition examination survey. Diabetes Care, 39(6), 1010–1017. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc15-2579

Beck

Greenwood

D. A.

Blanton

Bollinger

S. T.

Butcher

M. K.

Condon

J. E.

Cypress

Faulkner

Fischl

A. H.

Francis

Kolb

L. E.

Lavin-Tompkins

J. M.

MacLeod

Maryniuk

Mensing

Orzeck

E. A.

Pope

D. D.

Pulizzi

J. L.

Reed

A. A.

, … Wang

(2021). 2017 National standards for diabetes self-management education and support. The Science of Diabetes Self-Management and Care, 47(1), 14–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145721720987926

Center for Disease Control (2022a). CDC 2022 National Diabetes Statistics Report. Retrieved July 19 from https://nationaldppcsc.cdc.gov/s/article/CDC-2022-National-Diabetes-Statistics-Report.

Center for Disease Control (2022b). Hispanic or Latino People and Type 2 Diabetes. Retrieved July 19 from https://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/library/features/hispanic-diabetes.html.

Davis

R. E.

Lee

Johnson

T. P.

Rothschild

S. K.

(2019). Measuring the elusive construct of personalismo among Mexican American, Puerto Rican, and Cuban American adults. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 41(1), 103–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739986318822535

Fereday

Muir-Cochrane

(2006). Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(1), 80–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690600500107

Fox

(2011). Peer-to-peer Healthcare 2011. Pew Research Center.

García

A. A.

Zuñiga

J. A.

Lagon

(2017). A personal touch: The most important strategy for recruiting Latino research participants. Journal of Transcultural Nursing, 28(4), 342–347. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043659616644958

10.

Greenwood

D. A.

Litchman

M. L.

A. H.

Gee

P. M.

Young

H. M.

Ferrer

Memering

C. E.

Eichorst

Scibilia

Miller

L. M. S.

(2019). Development of the intercultural diabetes online community research council: Codesign and social Media processes. Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology, 13(2), 176–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932296818818455

11.

Hill-Briggs

Adler

N. E.

Berkowitz

S. A.

Chin

M. H.

Gary-Webb

T. L.

Navas-Acien

Thornton

P. L.

Haire-Joshu

(2020). Social determinants of health and diabetes: A scientific review. Diabetes Care, 44(1), 258–279. https://doi.org/10.2337/dci20-0053

12.

Litchman

M. L.

Sanchez-Birkhead

Allen

N. A.

Rodriguez-Gonzales

Iacob

Greenwood

D. A.

(2021). Combining CGM and an online peer support community for Hispanic adults with T2D: A feasibility study. Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology, 16(4), 866–873. https://doi.org/10.1177/19322968211032278

13.

Litchman

M. L.

Walker

H. R.

A. H.

Wawrzynski

S. E.

Oser

S. M.

Greenwood

D. A.

Gee

P. M.

Lackey

Oser

T. K.

(2019). State of the science: A scoping review and gap analysis of diabetes online communities. Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology, 13(3), 466–492. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932296819831042

14.

A. H.

Greenwood

D. A.

Iacob

Allen

N. A.

Ferrer

Rodriguez

Litchman

M. L.

(2022). Examining a continuous glucose monitoring plus online peer support community intervention to support Hispanic adults with type 2 diabetes: Protocol for a mixed methods feasibility study. JMIR Research Protocols, 11(2), e31595. https://doi.org/10.2196/31595

15.

Nowell

L. S.

Norris

J. M.

White

D. E.

Moules

N. J.

(2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1609406917733847. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847

16.

Pew Research Center (2021). Social media fact sheet. Retrieved July 12 from https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/fact-sheet/social-media/.

17.

Powers

M. A.

Bardsley

Cypress

Duker

Funnell

M. M.

Fischl

A. H.

Maryniuk

M. D.

Siminerio

Vivian

(2016). Diabetes self-management education and support in type 2 diabetes: A joint position statement of the American Diabetes Association, the American Association of diabetes educators, and the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Clinical Diabetes, 34(2), 70–80. https://doi.org/10.2337/diaclin.34.2.70

18.

Rideout

Fox

(2018). Digital health practices, social media use, and mental well-being among teens and young adults in the U.S. Hopelab and Well Being Trust.

19.

Rodriguez-Alcalá

M. E.

Qin

Jeanetta

(2019). The role of acculturation and social capital in access to health care: A meta-study on Hispanics in the US. Journal of Community Health, 44(6), 1224–1252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-019-00692-z

20.

Walker

A. F.

Addala

Sheehan

Lal

Haller

Cuttriss

Filipp

Baer

Gurka

Bernier

Figg

Westen

Hood

Anez-Zabala

Frank

Roque

Maizel

Maahs

(2022). Using peer power to reduce health disparities: Implementation of a diabetes support coach program in federally qualified health centers. Diabetes Spectrum, 35(3), 295–303. https://doi.org/10.2337/dsi22-0004

21.

Yeung

J. W. K.

Zhang

Kim

T. Y.

(2017). Volunteering and health benefits in general adults: Cumulative effects and forms. BMC Public Health, 18(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4561-8

22.

Yin

Wong

Chung

Lau

Lin

Tsang

Lau

Ozaki

Luk

Yeung

Chan

J. C.

(2015). Effects of providing peer support on diabetes management in people with type 2 diabetes. Annals of Family Medicine, 13(Suppl 1), S42–S49. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1853

23.

Yingling

Allen

N. A.

Litchman

M. L.

Colicchio

Gibson

B. S.

(2019). An evaluation of digital health tools for diabetes self-management in Hispanic adults: Exploratory study. JMIR Diabetes, 4(3), e12936. https://doi.org/10.2196/12936