Most countries and regions around the globe have introduced a range of public policies to address the growing challenge of climate change. Public administration provides the most direct technical and intellectual support to this end. Using a bibliometric methodology, this paper examines 1,511 articles on the topic of climate change in the field of public administration research over a 32-year period and sheds light on the dynamics associated with public policy formulation and management. The aim is to demonstrate management and policy priorities using the public sector as an entry point and to inform relevant multidisciplinary researchers and policymakers.
AbbottK. W. (2012). The transnational regime complex for climate change. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 30(4), 571–590.
2.
AdamsW. C.InfeldD. L.MinnichelliL. F.RuddellM. W. (2014). Policy journal trends and tensions: JPAM and PSJ. Policy Studies Journal, 42, S118–S137.
3.
AdamsW. C.InfeldD. L.WikrentK. L.Bintou CisseO. (2016). Network bibliometrics of public policy journals. Policy Studies Journal, 44(S1), S133–S151.
4.
AlexandrescuF.AnghelI.StănescuS.ŞtefănescuL.PopA. (2022). From environmental to climate justice: social-environmental expulsions and the emergence of a climate edge in Europe. Globalizations, 19(5), 760–780.
5.
AldunceP.HandmerJ.BeilinR.HowdenM. (2016). Is climate change framed as ‘business as usual’ or as a challenging issue? The practitioners’ dilemma. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 34(5), 999–1019.
6.
AllredS. B.ChatrchyanA. M.TsintsadzeG. (2022). Local municipal capacity for climate change action in New York State: Exploring the urban–rural divide. Review of Policy Research, 39(5), 570–601.
7.
AmolegbeS. M.LopezA. R.VelascoM. L.CarlinD. J.HeacockM. L.HenryH. F.TrottieB. A.SukW. A. (2022). Adapting to Climate Change: Leveraging Systems-Focused Multidisciplinary Research to Promote Resilience. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(22), 14674.
8.
AriaM.CuccurulloC. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975.
9.
AusloosM. (2013). A scientometrics law about co-authors and their ranking: The co-author core. Scientometrics, 95(3), 895–909.
10.
AverchenkovaA.FankhauserS.FinneganJ. J. (2021). The impact of strategic climate legislation: Evidence from expert interviews on the UK Climate Change Act. Climate Policy, 21(2), 251–263.
11.
BaileyA. J.WillsC. M.MitchemJ. (2022). Attitudes towards climate change and scientific stories. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 12(4), 714–726.
12.
BarrettJ.PetersG.WiedmannT.ScottK.LenzenM.RoelichK.Le QuéréC. (2013). Consumption-based GHG emission accounting: A UK case study. Climate Policy, 13(4), 451–470.
13.
BenzA. (2005). Public administrative science in Germany: Problems and prospects of a composite discipline. Public Administration, 83(3), 659–668.
14.
BoshoffN.NgwenyaS. (2022). Agricultural research in Zimbabwe: An author-level bibliometric analysis of publication outlets and research collaboration. Science, Technology and Society, 27(3), 404–428.
15.
BradfordS. C. (1934). Sources of information on specific subjects. Engineering, 137, 85–86.
16.
BrookesB. C. (1968). The derivation and application of the Bradford-Zipf distribution. Journal of Documentation, 24(4), 247–265.
17.
BrobergM. (2020). Parametric loss and damage insurance schemes as a means to enhance climate change resilience in developing countries. Climate Policy, 20(6), 693–703.
18.
BuchnerB.CarraroC. (2004). Economic and environmental effectiveness of a technology-based climate protocol. Climate Policy, 4(3), 229–248.
19.
BulkeleyH.AndonovaL.BäckstrandK.BetsillM.CompagnonD.DuffyR.KolkA.HoffmannM.LevyD.NewellP.MilledgeT.PatersonM.PattbergP.VanDeveerS. (2012). Governing climate change transnationally: Assessing the evidence from a database of sixty initiatives. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 30(4), 591–612.
20.
BumgarnerJ.NewswanderC. B. (2012). Governing alone and with partners: Presidential governance in a post-NPM environment. Administration & Society, 44(5), 546–570.
21.
BuysP.DeichmannU.MeisnerC. M.ThatT. T.WheelerD. (2007). Country stakes in climate change negotiations: Two dimensions of vulnerability (World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 4300). World Bank Policy Research.
22.
CaoY.QiF.CuiH. (2023). Toward carbon neutrality: A bibliometric analysis of technological innovation and global emission reductions. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(29), 73989-74005.
23.
CarlisleK.GrubyR. L. (2019). Polycentric systems of governance: A theoretical model for the commons. Policy Studies Journal, 47(4), 927–952.
24.
CarterN.JacobsM. (2014). Explaining radical policy change: The case of climate change and energy policy under the British labour government 2006–10. Public Administration, 92(1), 125–141.
25.
CepikuD.MastrodascioM. (2021). Equity in public services: A systematic literature review. Public Administration Review, 81(6), 1019–1032.
26.
CaprosP.MantzosL.ParousosL.TasiosN.KlaassenG.Van IerlandT. (2011). Analysis of the EU policy package on climate change and renewables. Energy policy, 39(3), 1476–1485.
27.
CherryC.ScottK.BarrettJ.PidgeonN. (2018). Public acceptance of resource-efficiency strategies to mitigate climate change. Nature Climate Change, 8(11), 1007–1012.
28.
ChienF.ChauK. Y.SadiqM. (2023). Impact of climate mitigation technology and natural resource management on climate change in China. Resources Policy, 81, 103367.
29.
CianoM. P.PozziR.RossiT.StrozziF. (2019). How IJPR has addressed ‘lean’: A literature review using bibliometric tools. International Journal of Production Research, 57(15–16), 5284–5317.
30.
DangW. (2020). How culture shapes environmental public participation: Case studies of China, the Netherlands, and Italy. Journal of Chinese Governance, 5(3), 390–412.
31.
DawesS. S.CresswellA. M.PardoT. A. (2009). From “need to know” to “need to share”: Tangled problems, information boundaries, and the building of public sector knowledge networks. Public Administration Review, 69(3), 392–402.
32.
De PauloA. F.PortoG. S. (2017). Solar energy technologies and open innovation: A study based on bibliometric and social network analysis. Energy Policy, 108, 228–238.
33.
De TocquevilleA. (2003). Democracy in America (Vol. 10). Regnery Publishing.
34.
DestlerK. N. (2016). Creating a performance culture: Incentives, climate, and organizational change. The American Review of Public Administration, 46(2), 201–225.
35.
DietzS.BowenA.DodaB.GambhirA.WarrenR. (2018). The economics of 1.5 C climate change. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 43, 455–480.
36.
DobbinK. B.LubellM. (2021). Collaborative governance and environmental justice: Disadvantaged community representation in California sustainable groundwater management. Policy Studies Journal, 49(2), 562–590.
37.
DolšakN.AdolphC.PrakashA. (2020). Policy design and public support for carbon tax: Evidence from a 2018 US national online survey experiment. Public Administration, 98(4), 905–921.
38.
DubnickM. J. (2018). Demons, spirits, and elephants: Reflections on the failure of public administration theory. Journal of Public and Nonprofit Affairs, 4(1), 59–115.
39.
DurantR. F.AliS. B. (2013). Repositioning American public administration? Citizen estrangement, administrative reform, and the disarticulated state. Public Administration Review, 73(2), 278–289.
40.
El ChamiD.TrabuccoA.WongT.MonemM. A.MereuV. (2022). Costs and effectiveness of climate change adaptation in agriculture: A systematic review from the NENA region. Climate Policy, 22(4), 445–463.
FewR.BrownK.TompkinsE. L. (2007). Public participation and climate change adaptation: Avoiding the illusion of inclusion. Climate Policy, 7(1), 46–59.
43.
FilippiM. E. (2022). A role for municipal governments in leveraging transformative change for urban disaster risk management: The experience of Santa Fe, Argentina, with urban flood risk. Climate Risk Management, 35, 100397.
44.
FranssenT.WoutersP. (2019). Science and its significant other: Representing the humanities in bibliometric scholarship. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 70(10), 1124–1137.
45.
FranklinA. L.GrossmanA.LeJ.ShaferM. (2019). Creating broader research impacts through boundary organizations. Public Administration Review, 79(2), 215–224.
46.
GiddensA. (2009). Politics of climate change. Polity, Cambridge, UK.
47.
GoeringE. S. (2018). The impact of organizational culture and climate on outcomes in child welfare: A modified systematic review. Human Service Organizations: Management, Leadership & Governance, 42(1), 68–85.
48.
GonencH.PoleskaA. (2023). Multinationals, research and development, and carbon emissions: International evidence. Climate Policy, 23, 959–974.
49.
GrayA.JenkinsB. (1995). From public administration to public management: Reassessing a revolution?Public Administration, 73(1), 75–99.
50.
GreenF.SternN. (2017). China’s changing economy: Implications for its carbon dioxide emissions. Climate Policy, 17(4), 423–442.
51.
GuZ.WissinkB.HuY. (2020). Mega-events and regional identities: The 2010 Asian Games language controversy. Policy & Politics, 48(4), 619–636.
52.
HanushekE. A. (1990). The policy research markets. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 9(2), 146–154.
53.
HaqueM. S. (1996). The intellectual crisis in public administration in the current epoch of privatization. Administration & Society, 27(4), 510–536.
54.
HartleyJ.AlfordJ.KniesE.DouglasS. (2017). Towards an empirical research agenda for public value theory. Public Management Review, 19(5), 670–685.
55.
HeadleyA. M. (2022). Accountability and police use of force: Interactive effects between minority representation and civilian review boards. Public Management Review, 24(11), 1682–1704.
56.
HeikkilaT. (2017). Evidence for tackling the complexities of water governance. Public Administration Review, 77(1), 17–20.
57.
HeltbergR.GitayH.PrabhuR. G. (2012). Community-based adaptation: Lessons from a grant competition. Climate Policy, 12(2), 143–163.
58.
HenstraD. (2012). Toward the climate-resilient city: Extreme weather and urban climate adaptation policies in two Canadian provinces. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 14(2), 175–194.
59.
HepburnC.GrubbM.NeuhoffK.MatthesF.TseM. (2006). Auctioning of EU ETS phase II allowances: How and why?Climate Policy, 6(1), 137–160.
60.
HoustonD. J.DelevanS. M. (1990). Public administration research: An assessment of journal publications. Public Administration Review, 50(6), 674.
61.
HowlettM.RaynerJ. (2006). Understanding the historical turn in the policy sciences: A critique of stochastic, narrative, path dependency and process-sequencing models of policy-making over time. Policy Sciences, 39(1), 1–18.
62.
HurlbertM.BhardwajA.AkbariM. (2023). Best versus beneficial MP discourses: The significance of a change in discourse managing agricultural water quality in Canada. Journal of Environmental Management, 332, 117289.
63.
HussainF.TsangD.RafiqueZ. (2024). Policy advisory systems and public policy making: Bibliometric analysis, knowledge mapping, operationalization, and future research agenda. Review of Policy Research, 41, 713–739.
64.
IEA (2021). Net Zero by 2050 - A Roadmap for the Global Energy Sector, p. 224.
65.
IPCC (2018). Global warming of 1.5 ◦C. An IPCC special report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5 ◦C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways. https://www.ipcc.ch/sr15/.
66.
IvanchevaL. E. (2001). The non-Gaussian nature of bibliometric and scientometric distributions: A new approach to interpretation. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(13), 1100–1105.
67.
JagersS. C.HammarH. (2009). Environmental taxation for good and for bad: the efficiency and legitimacy of Sweden’s carbon tax. Environmental Politics, 18(2), 218–237.
68.
JagersS. C.LofgrenA.StrippleJ. (2017). Attitudes to personal carbon allowances: political trust, fairness and ideology. Climate Policy, 10, 410–431.
69.
JarminR. S. (1999). Evaluating the impact of manufacturing extension on productivity growth. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management: The Journal of the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management, 18(1), 99–119.
70.
JonesM. D. (2014). Communicating climate change: Are stories better than “just the facts”?Policy Studies Journal, 42(4), 644–673.
71.
KapucuN.DemirozF. (2011). Measuring performance for collaborative public management using network analysis methods and tools. Public Performance & Management Review, 34(4), 549–579.
72.
KesickiF.EkinsP. (2012). Marginal abatement cost curves: A call for caution. Climate Policy, 12(2), 219–236.
73.
KettlD. F.MilwardH. B. (Eds.). (1996). The state of public management. JHU Press.
74.
KiltzL. (2011). The challenges of developing a homeland security discipline to meet future threats to the homeland. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, 8(2), 1–22.
75.
KlimaK.JerollemanA. (2014). Bridging the gap: Hazard mitigation in the global context. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, 11(2), 209–216.
76.
KreyV.ClarkeL. (2011). Role of renewable energy in climate mitigation: A synthesis of recent scenarios. Climate Policy, 11(4), 1131–1158.
77.
KukkonenA.Ylä-AnttilaT.BroadbentJ. (2017). Advocacy coalitions, beliefs and climate change policy in the United States. Public Administration, 95(3), 713–729.
78.
KuramochiT.RoelfsemaM.HsuA.LuiS.WeinfurterA.ChanS.HaleT.ClapperA.ChangA.HöhneN. (2020). Beyond national climate action: The impact of region, city, and business commitments on global greenhouse gas emissions. Climate Policy, 20(3), 275–291.
79.
KyseláE.ŠčasnýM.ZvěřinováI. (2019). Attitudes toward climate change mitigation policies: A review of measures and a construct of policy attitudes. Climate Policy, 19(7), 878–892.
80.
LachapelleE.BorickC. P.RabeB. (2012). Public attitudes toward climate science and climate policy in federal systems: Canada and the United States compared 1. Review of Policy Research, 29(3), 334–357.
81.
LarkinA.KuriakoseJ.SharminaM.AndersonK. (2018). What if negative emission technologies fail at scale? Implications of the Paris Agreement for big emitting nations. Climate Policy, 18(6), 690–714.
82.
Leal FilhoW.LevesqueV.SivapalanS.SalviaA. L.FritzenB.DeckertR.KozlovaV.LeVasseurT. J.Emblen-PerryK.AzeiteiroU. M.PaçoA.BorsariBShielC. (2022). Social values and sustainable development: Community experiences. Environmental Sciences Europe, 34(1), 1–13.
83.
LeeB.CassellC. (2013). Research methods and research practice: History, themes and topics. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15(2), 123–131.
84.
LeggettW. (2014). The politics of behaviour change: Nudge, neoliberalism and the state. Policy & Politics, 42(1), 3–19.
85.
LemaireR. H.ProvanK. G. (2018). Managing collaborative effort: How Simmelian ties advance public sector networks. The American Review of Public Administration, 48(5), 379–394.
86.
LevinK.CashoreB.BernsteinS.AuldG. (2012). Overcoming the tragedy of super wicked problems: Constraining our future selves to ameliorate global climate change. Policy Sciences, 45(2), 123–152.
87.
LinJ.LiuC.LiuW. (2021). Analysis of the logical relationship of elements of natural resource governance. Journal of Chinese Governance, 6(4), 537–553.
88.
LiuW.HuG.TangL.WangY. (2015). China’s global growth in social science research: Uncovering evidence from bibliometric analyses of SSCI publications (1978–2013). Journal of Informetrics, 9(3), 555–569.
89.
LiuY.TanC. (2023). The effectiveness of network administrative organizations in governing interjurisdictional natural resources. Public Administration, 101, 932–952.
90.
LiuZ.GuoJ.ZhongW.GuiT. (2021). Multi-level governance, policy coordination and subnational responses to COVID-19: Comparing China and the US. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 23(2), 204–218.
91.
LockwoodM.KuzemkoC.MitchellC.HoggettR. (2017). Historical institutionalism and the politics of sustainable energy transitions: A research agenda. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 35(2), 312–333.
92.
LucaD. L. (2015). Do traffic tickets reduce motor vehicle accidents? Evidence from a natural experiment. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 34(1), 85–106.
93.
LyuP. H.ZhangM. Z.LiuC. J.NgaiE. W. (2022). Global scientific production, international cooperation, and knowledge evolution of public administration. Public Administration, 101, 1134–1162.
94.
MackayS.BrownR.GonelevuM.PelesikotiN.KocovanuaT.IakenR.IautuF.Tuiafitu-MaloloL.FulivaiS.LepaM.MackeyB. (2019). Overcoming barriers to climate change information management in small island developing states: lessons from pacific SIDS. Climate Policy, 19(1), 125–138.
95.
Martín-AlcázarF.Ruiz-MartinezM.Sánchez-GardeyG. (2022). The performance of researchers in multidisciplinary research groups: Does social capital matter?International Review of Administrative Sciences, 88(2), 337–354.
96.
MathurV. N.AfionisS.PaavolaJ.DougillA. J.StringerL. C. (2014). Experiences of host communities with carbon market projects: Towards multi-level climate justice. Climate Policy, 14(1), 42–62.
97.
MatisoffD. C. (2008). The adoption of state climate change policies and renewable portfolio standards: Regional diffusion or internal determinants?Review of Policy Research, 25(6), 527–546.
98.
MayerA.SmithE. K. (2019). Unstoppable climate change? The influence of fatalistic beliefs about climate change on behavioural change and willingness to pay cross-nationally. Climate Policy, 19(4), 511–523.
99.
McDonaldB. D.III.HallJ. L.O’FlynnJ.van ThielS. (2022). The future of public administration research: An editor’s perspective. Public Administration, 100(1), 59–71.
100.
MokhnachevaY. V.TsvetkovaV. A. (2020). Development of bibliometrics as a scientific field. Scientific and Technical Information Processing, 47, 158–163.
101.
MoranD.WoodR.HertwichE.MattsonK.RodriguezJ. F.SchanesK.BarrettJ. (2020). Quantifying the potential for consumer-oriented policy to reduce European and foreign carbon emissions. Climate Policy, 20(sup1), S28–S38.
102.
MoranM. (2003). The British regulatory state: High modernism and hyper-innovation. Oxford University Press on Demand.
103.
MosherF. C. (1956). Research in public administration: Some notes and suggestions. Public Administration Review, 16(3), 169–178.
104.
NiC.SugimotoC. R.RobbinA. (2017). Examining the evolution of the field of public administration through a bibliometric analysis of public administration review. Public Administration Review, 77(4), 496–509.
105.
O’neillB. C.CrutzenP.GrüblerA.DuongM. H.KellerK.KolstadC.KoomeyJ.LangeA.ObersteinerM.OppenheimerM.PepperW.SandersonW.SchlesingerM.TreichN.UlphA.WebsterM.WilsonC. (2006). Learning and climate change.
106.
OnyanchaO. B.OchollaD. N. (2022). Dispersion of ICT-related subject terms in information and knowledge management publications: A Bradford analysis. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 9(1), 1–8.
107.
OrsiniA.CobutL.GaboritM. (2021). Climate change acts non-adoption as potential for renewed expertise and climate activism: The Belgian case. Climate Policy, 21(9), 1205–1217.
108.
OstromV. (2008). The intellectual crisis in American public administration. University of Alabama Press.
109.
ParkerR. S. (1965). The end of public administratio1. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 24(2), 9–103.
110.
PereiraV.BamelU. (2021). Extending the resource and knowledge based view: A critical analysis into its theoretical evolution and future research directions. Journal of Business Research, 132, 557–570.
111.
PetersonH. L.ZanoccoC. (2024). Presidential stories of fear: Focusing congressional climate change mitigation attention in the United States. Review of Policy Research, 41(4), 561–586.
112.
PidgeonN. (2012). Public understanding of, and attitudes to, climate change: UK and international perspectives and policy. Climate Policy, 12(sup01), S85–S106.
113.
PittsD. W. (2011). A little less conversation, a little more action: Using empirical research to promote social equity. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(suppl_1), i77–i82.
114.
PollittC. (2015). Wickedness will not wait: Climate change and public management research. Public Money & Management, 35(3), 181–186.
115.
PollittC. (2016). Be prepared? An outside-in perspective on the future public sector in Europe. Public Policy and Administration, 31(1), 3–28.
116.
QasimM. (2017). Sustainability and wellbeing: A scientometric and bibliometric review of the literature. Journal of Economic Surveys, 31(4), 1035–1061.
117.
RaadscheldersJ. C.LeeK. H. (2011). Trends in the study of public administration: Empirical and qualitative observations from Public Administration Review, 2000–2009. Public Administration Review, 71(1), 19–33.
118.
RadcliffeP.RoyA.BarterC.TompkinsC.BrooksM. (2020). A qualitative study of the practices and experiences of staff in multidisciplinary child sexual exploitation partnerships in three English coastal towns. Social Policy & Administration, 54(7), 1215–1230.
119.
RhoadesJ.GruberJ.HortonB. (2019). Promoting the resilience of older adults through participatory climate change adaptation planning. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, 16(3), 1–14.
120.
RobertsonP. J.ChoiT. (2010). Ecological governance: Organizing principles for an emerging era. Public Administration Review, 70, s89–s99.
121.
RogersN. J.AdamsV. M.ByrneJ. A. (2023). Factors affecting the mainstreaming of climate change adaptation in municipal policy and practice: A systematic review. Climate Policy, 23, 1327–1344.
122.
RosenbloomD. H. (1983). Public administrative theory and the separation of powers. Public Administration Review, 43, 219–227.
123.
RutgersM. R.Van Der MeerH. (2010). The origins and restriction of efficiency in public administration: Regaining efficiency as the core value of public administration. Administration & Society, 42(7), 755–779.
124.
RuthM.CoelhoD. (2007). Understanding and managing the complexity of urban systems under climate change. Climate Policy, 7(4), 317–336.
125.
SafarzyńskaK. (2018). Integrating behavioural economics into climate-economy models: Some policy lessons. Climate Policy, 18(4), 485–498.
126.
SchiffinoN.TaskinL.DonisC.RaoneJ. (2017). Post-crisis learning in public agencies: What do we learn from both actors and institutions?Policy Studies, 38(1), 59–75.
127.
SeyfangG.HaxeltineA. (2012). Growing grassroots innovations: Exploring the role of community-based initiatives in governing sustainable energy transitions. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 30(3), 381–400.
128.
SmithJ. B.DickinsonT.DonahueJ. D. B.BurtonI.HaitesE.KleinR. J. T.PatwardhanA. (2011). Development and climate change adaptation funding: coordination and integration. Climate Policy, 11(3), 987–1000. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2011.5823852011.582385
129.
Soto GolcherC.Visseren-HamakersI. J. (2018). Framing and integration in the global forest, agriculture and climate change nexus. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 36(8), 1415–1436.
130.
SuY. S.LinC. L.ChenS. Y.LaiC. F. (2020). Bibliometric study of social network analysis literature. Library Hi Tech, 38(2), 420–433.
131.
SvartzmanR.BoltonP.DespresM.Pereira Da SilvaL. A.SamamaF. (2021). Central banks, financial stability and policy coordination in the age of climate uncertainty: A three-layered analytical and operational framework. Climate Policy, 21(4), 563–580.
132.
SwedlowB. (2014). Advancing policy theory with cultural theory: An introduction to the special issue. Policy Studies Journal, 42(4), 465–483.
133.
SwedlowB. (2017). Three cultural boundaries of science, institutions, and policy: A cultural theory of coproduction, boundary-work, and change. Review of Policy Research, 34(6), 827–853.
134.
TomaszewskiR. (2023). Visibility, impact, and applications of bibliometric software tools through citation analysis. Scientometrics, 128, 4007–4028 .
135.
TsayM. Y.ShuZ. Y. (2011). Journal Bibliometric Analysis: A case study on the Journal of Documentation. Journal of Documentation, 67(5), 806–822.
136.
TurnhoutE. (2009). The effectiveness of boundary objects: The case of ecological indicators. Science and Public Policy, 36(5), 403–412.
137.
TurnpennyJ.AlexanderM. (2024). Addressing risks to mental health from climate change: A policy capacity analysis of England. Climate Policy, 24(9), 1211–1224.
138.
Van den HoveS.Le MenestrelM.De BettigniesH. C. (2002). The oil industry and climate change: Strategies and ethical dilemmas. Climate Policy, 2(1), 3–18.
139.
Van der VoetJ.SteijnB. (2021). Team innovation through collaboration: How visionary leadership spurs innovation via team cohesion. Public Management Review, 23(9), 1275–1294.
140.
VerweijM.DouglasM.EllisR.EngelC.HendriksF.LohmannS.NeyS.RaynerS.ThompsonM. (2006). Clumsy solutions for a complex world: The case of climate change. Public Administration, 84(4), 817–843.
141.
VogelR.HattkeF. (2022). A century of Public Administration: Traveling through time and topics. Public Administration, 100(1), 17–40.
142.
vonHedemannN.BreidenbachT.CarneyC. P.Carr ChildersL.David-ChavezD. M.HavrillaC. A.HillM.MahmoudH.MuellerN. D.SchultzC. A.Stevens-RumannC. S. (2023). Climate adaptation research priorities and funding: A review of US federal departments’ climate action plans. Climate Policy, 23(10), 1288–1301.
143.
WallaceD. P.Van FleetC.DownsL. J. (2011). The research core of the knowledge management literature. International Journal of Information Management, 31(1), 14–20.
144.
WangM.ChaiL. (2018). Three new bibliometric indicators/approaches derived from keyword analysis. Scientometrics, 116, 721–750.
145.
WernstedtK.RobertsP.DullM. (2009). Can climate signals inform emergency management? Preliminary evidence. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, 6(1), 1–8.
146.
WheelandC. M.PalusC. K.WoodC. (2014). A century of municipal reform in the United States: A legacy of success, adaptation, and the impulse to improve. The American Review of Public Administration, 44(4_suppl), 11S–28S.
147.
WhiteD. D.WutichA.LarsonK. L.GoberP.LantT.SennevilleC. (2010). Credibility, salience, and legitimacy of boundary objects: Water managers’ assessment of a simulation model in an immersive decision theater. Science and Public Policy, 37(3), 219–232.
148.
WiebeR. H. (1967). The search for order, 1877-1920. Macmillan.
149.
WilsonW. (1941). The study of public administration. Political Science Quarterly, 56, 481–506.
150.
WrightB. E. (2011). Public administration as an interdisciplinary field: Assessing its relationship with the fields of law, management, and political science. Public Administration Review, 71(1), 96–101.
151.
XuC.MaB.ChenX.MaF. (2013). Social tagging in the scholarly world. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(10), 2045–2057.
152.
YangL. (2019). Public Administration as a dynamic balance and integrative science across politics, management, and law: Rosenbloom’s framework and Chinese experiences. The American Review of Public Administration, 49(1), 79–97.
153.
ZhangF.WelchE. W.MiaoQ. (2018). Public organization adaptation to extreme events: Mediating role of risk perception. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 28(3), 371–387.
154.
ZeitounM.LankfordB.KruegerT.ForsythT.CarterR.HoekstraA. Y.TaylorR.VarisO.CleaverF.BoelensR.SwatukL.TicknerD.ScottC. A.MirumachiN.MatthewsN. (2016). Reductionist and integrative research approaches to complex water security policy challenges. Global Environmental Change, 39, 143–154.
