This article examines the mechanisms underlying the formation of U.S. national clean energy policy network. Informed by the Institutional Collective Action (ICA) framework, this article develops and tests hypotheses regarding cooperation versus coordination hypotheses regarding the reasons underlying clean energy policy actors’ networking activities. Using a webcrawler data collection strategy and measuring policy network with hyperlink network, a data set of network relationships among the clean energy policy actors is collected. Exponential Random Graph Models (ERGMs) are applied to test the proposed hypotheses, and results show strong empirical evidence supporting cooperation hypotheses, with partial support for coordination hypotheses.
AcklandR. (2011). WWW hyperlink networks. In DerekD. L.ShneidermanB.SmithM. A. (Eds.), Analyzing social media networks with NodeXL: Insights from a connected world. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
2.
AcklandR.O'NeilM. (2011). Online collective identity: The case of the environmental movement. Social Networks, 33(3), 177–190.
3.
AdamicL. A. (1999). The small world Web [Conference session]. Proceedings of 3rd European conference of research and advanced technology for digital libraries, ECDL. Retrieved October 3, 2002 from http://www.hpl.hp.com/shl/papers/smallworld/smallworldpaper.html
4.
AdamicL. A.AdarE. (2003). Friends and neighbors on the web. Social Networks, 25(3), 211–230.
5.
AdamicL. A.BhavnaniS. K.ShiX. (2007). Scatter networks: A new approach for analyzing information scatter on the web. New Journal of Physics, 9, 231.
6.
BaeS.ChoiJ. H. (2000). Cyberlinks between human rights NGOs: A network analysis [Paper presentation]. Paper presented to the 58th annual national meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.
7.
BarabasiA. L.AlbertR. (1999). Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science, 286, 509–512.
8.
BarabásiA. L.AlbertR.JeongH. (2000). Scale-free characteristics of random networks: The topology of the world wide web. Physica A, 281, 69–77.
9.
BarnettG. A. (2001). A longitudinal analysis of the international telecommunication network, 1978-1996. American Behavioral Scientist, 44(10), 1638–1655.
10.
BaumgartnerF. R.BryanD. J. (1993). Agendas and instability in American politics. University of Chicago Press.
11.
BerardoR.ScholzJ. T. (2010). Self-organizing policy networks: Risk, partner selection and cooperation in estuaries. American Journal of Political Science, 54(3), 632–649.
12.
BernieH. (2011). Visualizing and interpreting Facebook networks. In DerekD. L.ShneidermanB.SmithM. A. (Eds.), Analyzing social media networks with NodeXL: Insights from a connected world. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
13.
BrinS.PageL. (1998). The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual web search engine. Computer Networks and ISDN Systems, 30, 107–117.
14.
CarleyS. (2011). The era of state energy policy innovation: A review of policy instruments. Review of Policy Research, 28, 265–294.
15.
CarpenterD. P.EsterlingK. M.LazerD. M. J. (1998). The strength of weak ties in lobbying networks: Evidence from health-care politics in the United States. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 10(4), 417–444.
16.
DavenportE.CroninB. (2000). The citation network as a prototype for representing trust in virtual environments. In CroninB.AtkinsH. B. (Eds.), The Web of knowledge: A festschrift in honor of Eugene Garfield (pp. 517–534). Information Today Inc. ASIS Monograph Series.
17.
DrummondW. J. (2010). Statehouse Versus Greenhouse: Have state-level Climate Action Planners and policy entrepreneurs reduced greenhouse gas emissions?. Journal of the American Planning Association, 76(4), 413–433.
18.
FeiockR. C.JohnS. Eds (2010). Self-organizing governance: Collaborative mechanisms to mitigate institutional collective action dillemas. Cambridge University Press.
19.
FeiockR. C.LeeI. W.ParkH. J.LeeK. H. (2010). Collaboration networks among local elected officials: Information, commitment and risk aversion. Urban Affairs Review, 46, 241–262.
20.
Gonzalez-BailonS. (2009). Opening the black box of link formation: Social factors underlying the structure of the web. Social Networks, 31(4), 271–280.
21.
HansenD. L.BenS.MarcA. S. (2011). Analyzing social media networks with NodeXL: Insights from a connected World. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
22.
HecloH. (1978). “Issue networks and the executive establishment.”. In KingA. (Ed.), The new American political system (pp. 87–124). American Enterprise Institute.
23.
HowlettM. (2002). Do networks matter? Linking policy network structure to policy outcomes: Evidence from four Canadian policy sectors 1990-2000. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 35(2), 235–267.
24.
JangS.YiH. (2022). Organized elite power and clean energy: A study of negative policy experimentations with renewable portfolio standards. Review of Policy Research, 39(1), 8–31.
25.
KleinbergJ. M. (1999). Authoritative sources in a hyperlinked environment. Journal of the ACM, 46(5), 604–632.
26.
KrebsV. (2000). Working in the connected world book network. IHRIM Journal, 4(1), 87–90.
27.
LaumannE. O.DavidK. (1987). The organizational state: Social choice in national policy domains. University of Wisconsin Press.
28.
LeeI. W.FeiockR. C.LeeY. (2012). Competitors and cooperators: A micro-level analysis of regional economic development collaboration networks. Public Administration Review, 72(2), 253–262.
29.
LubellM.ScholzJ.BerardoR.RobinsG. (2012). Testing policy theory with statistical models of networks. Policy Studies Journal, 40, 351–374.
30.
MatisoffD. C. (2008). The adoption of state climate change policies and renewable portfolio standards: Regional diffusion or internal determinants?Review of Policy Research, 25, 527–546.
31.
McNuttK. (2006). Virtual policy networks. In AnttiroikoA.-V.MälkiäM. (Eds.), The encyclopedia of digital government (pp. 1606–1611). Idea Groups Inc.
32.
McNuttK.PalL. A. (2011). “Modernizing government”: Mapping global public policy networks. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration and Institutions, 24(3), 439–467.
33.
ParkH. W.BarnettG. A.KimC. S. (2000). Political communication structure in Internet networks - A Korean case. Sungkok Journalism Review, 11, 67–89.
34.
ParkH. W.BarnettG. A.KimC. S. (2001). Internet communication structure in Korean National Assembly: A network analysis. Korean Journal of Journalism & Communication Studies, 12, 185–204.
35.
ParkH. W.KimC. S.BarnettG. A. (2004). Socio-communicational structure among political actors on the web in SouthKorea: The dynamics of digital presence in cyberspace. New Media & Society, 6(3), 403–423.
36.
ParkH. W.ThelwallM. (2003). Hyperlink analyses of the World Wide Web: A review [Electronic Version]. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 8. Retrieved Nov 1, 2005 from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol8/issue4/park.html
37.
ProvanK. G.MilwardH. B. (1995). A preliminary theory of interorganizational network effectiveness: A comparative study of four community mental health systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 1–33.
38.
PutnamR. D. (1993). Making democracy work. Princeton University Press.
39.
RabeB. G. (2008). States on steroids: The intergovernmental odyssey of American climate policy. Review of Policy Research, 25(2), 105–128.
40.
RobinsG.PattisonP.KalishY.LusherD. (2007a). An introduction to exponential random graph (p*) models for social networks. Social Networks, 29, 173–191.
41.
RobinsG.SnijdersT.WangP.HandcockM.PattisonP. (2007b). Recent developments in exponential random graph (p*) models for social networks. Social Networks, 29, 192–215.
42.
RogersR. (2010). Internet research: The question of method—A keynote address from the YouTube and the 2008 election cycle in the United States conference. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 7(2/3), 241–260.
43.
RogersR.Ben-DavidA. (2010). Coming to terms: A conflict analysis of the usage, in official and unofficial sources, of ‘security fence’, ‘apartheid wall,’ and other terms for the structure between Israel and the Palestinian Territories. Media, Conflict & War, 3(2), 202–229.
44.
RogersR.MarresN. (2000). Landscaping climate change: A mapping technique for understanding science and technology debates on the world wide web. Public Understanding of Science, 9, 141–163.
45.
RonaldB. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Harvard University Press.
46.
RotmanD.JenniferG. (2011). Youtube: Contrasting patterns of content, interaction, and prominance. In DerekD. L.ShneidermanB.SmithM. A. (Eds.), Analyzing social media networks with NodeXL: Insights from a connected world. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
47.
SabatierP. A.Jenkins-SmithH. (1993). Policy change and learning: An advocacy coalition approach. Westview Press.
48.
ScholzJ. T.BerardoR.KileB. (2008). Do networks solve collective action problems? Credibility, search, and collaboration. The Journal of Politics, 70(2), 393–406.
49.
ShresthaM. K.FeiockR. C. (2011). Transaction cost, exchange embeddedness and interlocal cooperation in local public goods supply. Political Research Quarterly, 64(3), 573–587.
50.
SnijdersT. A. B.PattisonP. E.RobinsG. L.HandcockM. S. (2006). New specifications for exponential random graph models. Sociological Methodology, 36, 99–153.
51.
WelserH. T.UnderwoodP.CosleyD.HansenD.LauraW. B. (2011). Wiki networks: Connections of creativity and collaboration. In DerekD. L.ShneidermanB.SmithM. A. (Eds.), Analyzing social media networks with NodeXL: Insights from a connected world. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
52.
YiH. (2018). Network structure and governance performance: What makes a difference?Public Administration Review, 78(2), 195–205.
53.
YiH.FeiockR. C. (2012). Policy tool interactions and the adoption of state renewable portfolio standards. Review of Policy Research, 29(2), 193–206.
54.
YiH.FeiockR. C. (2014). Renewable energy politics: Policy typologies, policy tools, and state deployment of renewables. Policy Studies Journal, 42(3), 391–415.
55.
YiH.ScholzJ. T. (2016). Policy networks in complex governance subsystems: Observing and comparing hyperlink, media, and partnership networks. Policy Studies Journal, 44(3), 248–279.
56.
YiH.SuoL.ShenR.ZhangJ.RamaswamiA.FeiockR. C. (2018). Regional governance and institutional collective action for environmental sustainability. Public Administration Review, 78(4), 556–566.
