Network governance and effectiveness on renewable energy integration: A comparative case study on power transmission networks in the United States

Abstract

This paper examines how network structure and coordinating mechanisms in the US power transmission system affect the integration of wind energy through comparative case studies. The two transmission network cases represent two major transmission network governance models in the US power sector. Using archival data from all network participants and interviews with key stakeholders, we find that a centralized transmission network coordinated by an independent network administrative organization (NAO) is more effective in integrating wind power than a less centralized structure. Particularly, the concentration of decision-making authorities is a more substantial determinant than the structural centrality of the core agency. The two cases also highlight that hierarchy, collaboration, and market mechanisms coexist in a transmission network to manage the tension between stability and flexibility. When the network operates in a turbulent environment with great uncertainties, different coordinating mechanisms complement each other to improve system resilience.

Keywords

Network governance network effectiveness renewable energy power transmission network

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aggarwal

Harvey

(2013). Rethinking policy to deliver a clean energy future. The Electricity Journal, 26(8), 7–22.

Agranoff

McGuire

(2001). Big questions in public network management research. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 11(3), 295–326.

Agranoff

McGuire

(2003). Collaborative public management: New strategies for local governments. Georgetown University Press.

Ansell

Gash

(2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of public administration research and theory, 18(4), 543–571.

Bird

Cochran

Wang

(2014). Wind and solar energy curtailment: Experience and practices in the United States (No. NREL/TP-6A20-60983). National Renewable Energy Lab.(NREL), Golden, CO (United States).

Baldwin

Tang

(2021). Hierarchies, markets, and collaborative networks in energy governance: Multilevel drivers of renewable energy deployment. Journal of Environmental Management, 290, 112614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112614

Borgatti

S. P.

Everett

M. G.

Johnson

J. C.

(2013). Analyzing social networks. SAGE.

Bloom

Forrester

J. P.

Lugman

(2010). Current conflicts in U.S. electric transmission planning, cost allocation and renewable energy policies: More heat than light? Electricity Journal, 23(10), 8–17.

Brown

A. C.

Rossi

(2010). Siting transmission lines in a changed milieu: Evolving notions of the ‘‘Public Interest’’ in balancing state and regional considerations. University of Colorado Law Review, 81(3), 705–770.

10.

Bryson

J. M.

Crosby

B. C.

Stone

M. M.

(2006). The design and implementation of cross-sector collaborations: Propositions from the literature. Public Administration Review, 66, 44–55.

11.

Buckman

(2011). The effectiveness of renewable portfolio standards banding and carve-outs in supporting high-cost types of renewable electricity. Energy Policy, 39(7), 4105–4114.

12.

CAISO. (2021). 2020 Annual Report on Market Issues and Performance. http://www.caiso.com/Documents/2020-Annual-Report-on-Market-Issues-and-Performance.pdf

13.

Campbell

Osserman

Pedersen

(2013). Coding in-depth semistructured interviews: Problems of unitization and intercoder reliability and agreement. Sociological Methods and Research, 42(3), 294–320.

14.

Carley

(2009). State renewable energy electricity policies: An empirical evaluation of effectiveness. Energy Policy, 37(8), 3071–3081.

15.

Carley

Browne

T. R.

(2013). Innovative US energy policy: A review of states’ policy experiences. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, 2(5), 488–506.

16.

Carley

Davies

L. L.

Spence

D. B.

Zirogiannis

(2018). Empirical evaluation of the stringency and design of renewable portfolio standards. Nature Energy, 3(9), 754–763.

17.

Cui

(2020). What drives the performance of collaboration networks: A qualitative comparative analysis of local water governance in China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(6), 1819.

18.

EIA. (2020). Form EIA-860 detailed data with previous form data. https://www.eia.gov/electricity/data/eia860/

19.

Ela

Milligan

Bloom

Botterud

Townsend

Levin

(2014). Evolution of wholesale electricity market design with increasing levels of renewable generation (NREL Technical Report, NREL/TP-5D00-61765).

20.

Energy Information Administration. (2021). Renewables became the second-most prevalent U.S. electricity source in 2020. Author. https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=48896#

21.

Feiock

R. C.

Lee

I. W.

Park

H. J.

Lee

K.-H.

(2010). Collaboration networks among local elected officials: Information, commitment, and risk aversion. Urban Affairs Review, 46(2), 241–262.

22.

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. (2016). Common metrics report: Performance metrics for regional transmission organizations, independent system operators, and individual utilities for the 2010–2014 reporting period. Author.https://www.ferc.gov/sites/default/files/2020-05/08-09-common-metrics_1.pdf

23.

Fischlein

Wilson

E. J.

Peterson

T. R.

Stephens

J. C.

(2013). States of transmission: Moving towards large-scale wind power. Energy Policy, 56, 101–113.

24.

Gaul

Carley

(2012). Solar set asides and renewable electricity certificates: Early lessons from North Carolina’s experience with its renewable portfolio standard. Energy Policy, 48, 460–469.

25.

Hitaj

, 2013. Wind power development in the United States. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 65 (3), 394–410.

26.

Hunsaker

Samaan

Milligan

Guo

Liu

Toolson

(2013). Balancing authority cooperation concepts to reduce variable generation integration costs in the western interconnection: Intra-hour scheduling (WECC final technical report).

27.

ISO/RTO Council. (2022). IRC history. https://isorto.org/

28.

Jones

Hesterly

W. S.

Borgatti

S. P.

(1997). A general theory of network governance: Exchange conditions and social mechanisms. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 911–945.

29.

Kapucu

Arslan

Collins

M. L.

(2010). Examining intergovernmental and interorganizational response to catastrophic disasters toward a network-centered approach. Administration and Society, 42(2), 222–247.

30.

Kapucu

Augustin

M. E.

Garayev

(2009). Interstate partnerships in emergency management: Emergency management assistance compact in response to catastrophic disasters. Public Administration Review, 69, 297–313.

31.

Kapucu

Garayev

(2012). Mitigation and emergency management. In Natural hazard mitigation (pp. 19–41). CRC Press.

32.

Keast

Mandell

(2014). The collaborative push: moving beyond rhetoric and gaining evidence. Journal of management & governance, 18(1), 9–28.

33.

Kim

J. E.

Tang

(2020). Preventing early lock-in with technology-specific policy designs: The Renewable Portfolio Standards and diversity in renewable energy technologies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Review, 123(5), 109738.

34.

Klass

Wilson

(2012). Interstate transmission challenges for renewable energy: A federalism mismatch. Vanderbilt Law Review, 65(6), 1801–1873.

35.

Koch

C. H.

(2009). Collaborative governance: Lessons for Europe from U.S. electricity restructuring. Administrative Law Review, 61, 71–102.

36.

Lannoye

Flynn

O’Malley

(2012). Evaluation of power system flexibility. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 27(2), 922–931.

37.

Lenhart

Nelson-Marsh

Wilson

E. J.

Solan

(2016). Electricity governance and the Western energy imbalance market in the United States: The necessity of interorganizational collaboration. Energy Research and Social Science, 19, 94–107.

38.

Silva

Belhomme

Kirschen

D. S.

(2013). Evaluating and planning flexibility in sustainable power systems. IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting Proceedings, July 21–25, 2013, Vancouver, British Columbia.

39.

MacPhail

Khoza

Abler

Ranganathan

(2016). Process guidelines for establishing intercoder reliability in qualitative studies. Qualitative Research, 16(2), 198–212.

40.

McGuire

(2006). Collaborative public management: Assessing what we know and how we know it. Public Administration Review, 66, 33–43.

41.

Medina

Siciliano

M. D.

Wang

(2021). Network effects research: A systematic review of theoretical mechanisms and measures. arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.12081.

42.

Milward

H. B.

Provan

K. G.

Fish

Isett

K. R.

Huang

(2010). Governance and collaboration: An evolutionary study of two mental health networks. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(suppl_1), i125–i141.

43.

Milligan

Kirby

(2007). Analysis of sub-hourly ramping impacts of wind energy and balancing area size. Proceedings WindPower 2008, Houston, Texas, June 1–4, 2008. www.nrel.gov/wind/pdfs/43434.pdf

44.

Milward

H. B.

Provan

K. G.

(2006). A manager’s guide to choosing and using collaborative networks (Vol. 8). Washington, DC: IBM Center for the Business of Government.

45.

Miranda

J. L.

(Ed.). (2009). Capturing the power of electric restructuring. American Bar Association.

46.

MISO. (2021). MISO corporate fact sheet. https://www.misoenergy.org/about/media-center/corporate-fact-sheet/

47.

MIT. (2011). The future of the electric grid. MIT Study. http://web.mit.edu/mitei/research/studies/the-electric-grid-2011.shtml

48.

Moynihan

D. P.

(2009). The network governance of crisis response: Case studies of incident command systems. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19(4), 895–915.

49.

O’Toole

L. J.

Jr (1997). Treating networks seriously: Practical and research-based agendas in public administration. Public administration review, 45–52.

50.

O’Toole

L. J.

Meier

K. J.

(2004). Public management in intergovernmental networks: Matching structural networks and managerial networking. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14, 469–494.

51.

Powell

W. W.

(1990). Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization. In Staw

B. M.

Cummings

L. L.

(Ed.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 12, pp. 295–336). JAI Press.

52.

Provan

K. G.

Kenis

(2008). Modes of network governance: Structure, management, and effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(2), 229–252.

53.

Provan

K. G.

Milward

H. B.

(1995). A preliminary theory of interorganizational network effectiveness: A comparative study of four community mental health systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 1–33.

54.

Provan

K. G.

Milward

H. B.

(2001). Do networks really work? A framework for evaluating public-sector organizational networks. Public Administration Review, 61, 414–423.

55.

Provan

K. G.

Sebastian

J. G.

(1998). Networks within networks: Service link overlap, organizational cliques, and network effectiveness. The Academy of Management Journal, 41(4), 453–463.

56.

Raab

(2004). More than just a metaphor: The network concept and its potential in Holocaust research. In Feldman

G. D.

Seibel

(Eds.), Networks of nazi persecution: Bureaucracy, business, and the organization of the holocaust (pp. 321–39). Berghahn.

57.

Raab

Mannak

Cambre

(2013). Combining structure, governance, and context: A configurational approach to network effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(2), 479–511.

58.

Robins

Bates

Pattison

(2011). Network governance and environmental management: Conflict and cooperation. Public Administration, 89(4), 1293–1313.

59.

Samaan

N. A.

Makarov

Y. V.

Nguyen

T. B.

Diao

(2017). Balancing authority cooperation concepts to reduce variable generation integration costs in the western interconnection: consolidating balancing authorities and sharing balancing reserves. In Integration of large-scale renewable energy into bulk power systems (pp. 189–226). Springer, Cham.

60.

Schlag

Olson

Hart

Mileva

Jones

Brancucci Martinez-Anido

Hodge

B. M.

Brinkman

Florita

Biagioni

(2015). Western interconnection flexibility assessment, final report. NREL.

61.

Scott

T. A.

(2015). Does collaboration make any difference? Linking collaborative governance to environmental outcomes. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 34(3), 537–566.

62.

Scott

T. A.

(2016). Is collaboration a good investment? Modeling the link between funds given to collaborative watershed councils and water quality. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 26(4), 769–786.

63.

Scott

T. A.

Thomas

C. W.

Magallanes

J. M.

(2019). Convening for consensus: Simulating stakeholder agreement in collaborative governance processes under different network conditions. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 29(1), 32–49.

64.

Shrestha

M. K.

(2018). Network structure, strength of relationships, and communities’ success in project implementation. Public Administration Review, 78(2), 284–294.

65.

Tang

(2018). Explaining technological change in the US wind industry: Energy policies, technological learning, and collaboration. Energy Policy, 120, 197–212.

66.

Tang

Popp

(2016). The learning process and technological change in wind power: Evidence from China’s CDM wind projects. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 35(1), 195–222.

67.

Ulibarri

Scott

T. A.

(2017). Linking network structure to collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 27(1), 163–181.

68.

WECC. (2021). State of the Interconnection. https://www.wecc.org/epubs/StateOfTheInterconnection

69.

Wiser

Bolinger

(2011). 2010 wind technologies market report (No. NREL/TP-5000-51783; DOE/GO-102011-3322). National Renewable Energy Lab.(NREL), Golden, CO (United States).

70.

Wiser

Bolinger

(2012). 2011 Wind technologies market report. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, DOE/GO-102012-3472.

71.

(2018). Network structure and governance performance: What makes a difference? Public Administration Review, 78(2), 195–205.

72.

Liu

(2021). Network structure and low-carbon governance performance: A qualitative comparative analysis. International Public Management Journal, 24(1), 23–46.

73.

Yin

Powers

(2010). Do state renewable portfolio standards promote in-state renewable generation? Energy Policy, 38(2), 1140–1149.

74.

Yin

R. K.

(2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE.