Drawing on the resource theory of political participation, we compare the determinants of Internet-based e-participation and conventional offline political participation in China by employing data from an original survey conducted in 2013. We find that e-government and other online platforms provide more equal participation opportunities to Chinese citizens traditionally lacking political resources. Although non-party members and non-elites are disadvantaged in conventional offline participation, they are not in e-participation, especially through using e-government systems. Internet/computer access and Internet skills push individuals away from conventional offline participation, and frequent social media users are more likely to engage in e-participation. Taken together, these results suggest that e-government and other online platforms offer the genuine potential to expand the scope of participation and empowers those traditionally disadvantaged in China.
Abu-ShanabE. A. (2013). The relationship between transparency and e-government: An empirical support. In WimmerM. A.JanssenM.MacintoshA.SchollH. J.TambourisE. (Eds.), Electronic government and electronic participation - joint proceedings of ongoing research of IFIP EGOV and IFIP ePart 2021 (pp.84–91). Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V.
2.
BestS. J.KruegerB. S. (2005). Analyzing the representativeness of Internet political participation. Political Behavior, 27(2), 183–216.
3.
BradyH. E.VerbaS.SchlozmanK. L. (1995). Beyond SES: A resource model of political participation. American Political Science Review, 89, 271–294.
4.
BucyE. P. (2000). Emotional and evaluative consequences of inappropriate leader displays. Communication Research, 27(2), 194–226.
5.
ChanJ. M.ZhouB. (2011). Expressive behaviors across discursive spaces and issue types. Asian Journal of Communication, 21(2), 150–166.
6.
ChenJ.PanJ.XuY. (2016). Sources of authoritarian responsiveness: A field experiment in China. American Journal of Political Science, 60(2), 383–400.
7.
ChenX. (2004) “Chinese Petitioners’ Tactics and Their Efficacy” Unpublished paper.
8.
ChenX. (2012). Social protest and contentious authoritarianism in China. Cambridge University Press.
9.
ChenX.XuP. (2011). From resistance to advocacy: Political representation for disabled people in China. The China Quarterly, 207, 649–667.
DahlbergL. (2001). The Internet and democratic discourse: Exploring the prospects of online deliberative forums extending the public sphere. Information Communication & Society, 4(4), 615–633.
EkmanJ. (2009). Political participation and regime stability: A framework for analyzing hybrid regimes. International Political Science Review, 30(1), 7–31.
16.
EsselimaniS.SagsanM.KiralpS. (2021). E-government effect on participatory democracy in the maghreb: Indirect effect and government-led participation. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, 2021, 1–13.
17.
EvelandW. P.DunwoodyS. (2000). Examining information processing on the World Wide Web using think aloud protocols. Media Psychology, 2(3), 219–244.
18.
EvelandW. P.ScheufeleD. A. (2000). Connecting news media use with gaps in knowledge and participation. Political Communication, 17(3), 215–237.
Gil de ZúñigaH.JungN.ValenzuelaS. (2012). Social media use for news and individuals’ social capital, civic engagement and political participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17(3), 319–336.
21.
GrubesicT. H.MurrayA. T. (2002). Constructing the divide: Spatial disparities in broadband access. Papers in regional science, 81(2), 197–221.
22.
HardingH. (1994). The contemporary study of Chinese politics: an introduction. The China Quarterly, 139, 699–703.
23.
HardyB. W.ScheufeleD. A. (2005). Examining differential gains from Internet use: Comparing the moderating role of talk and online interactions. Journal of Communication, 55(1), 71–84.
JayasuriyaK.RodanG. (2007). Beyond hybrid regimes: More participation, less contestation in Southeast Asia. Democratization, 14(5), 773–794.
26.
JenningsM. K. (1997). Political participation in the Chinese countryside. American Political Science Review, 91(2), 361–372.
27.
JenningsM. K. (1998). Gender and political participation in the Chinese countryside. The Journal of Politics, 60(4), 954–973.
28.
JenningsM. K.ZeitnerV. (2003). Internet use and civic engagement: A longitudinal analysis. Public Opinion Quarterly, 67(3), 311–334. https://doi.org/10.1086/376947
29.
JiangM. (2010). The search for deliberative democracy in China. In EthanL.BaogangH. E. (Eds.), Spaces of authoritarian deliberation: Online public deliberation in China (pp. 261–287). Palgrave Macmillan.
30.
JiangM.XuH. (2009). Exploring online structures on Chinese government portals: Citizen political participation and government legitimation. Social Science Computer Review, 27(2), 174–195. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439308327313
31.
KingG.PanJ.RobertsM. E. (2013). How censorship in China allows government criticism but silences collective expression. American Political Science Review, 107(2), 326–343.
32.
KingG.PanJ.RobertsM. E. (2014). Reverse-engineering censorship in China: Randomized experimentation and participant observation. Science, 345(6199), 891–901.
33.
KingG.PanJ.RobertsM. E. (2017). How the Chinese government fabricates social media posts for strategic distraction, not engaged argument. American Political Science Review, 111(3), 484–501.
34.
KrautR.PattersonM.LundmarkV.KieslerS.MukopadhyayT.ScherlisW. (1998). Internet paradox: A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being?American Psychologist, 53(9), 1017–1031.
35.
KruegerB. S. (2002). Assessing the potential of Internet political participation in the United States: A resource approach. American Politics Research, 30(5), 476–498.
36.
LeiboldJ. (2011). Blogging alone: China, the internet, and the democratic illusion?The Journal of Asian Studies, 70(4), 1023–1041.
37.
LeighA.AtkinsonR. D. (2001). Clear thinking on the digital divide. Progressive Policy Institute.
38.
LijphartA. (1997). Unequal participation: Democracy’s unresolved dilemma presidential address, American Political Science Association, 1996. American Political Science Review, 91(1), 1–14.
39.
LiL. (2004). Political trust in rural China. Modern China, 30(2), 228–258.
40.
LiL. (2008). Political trust and petitioning in the Chinese countryside. Comparative Politics, 40(2), 209–226.
41.
MackT. C. (2004). Internet communities: The future of politics?Futures Research Quarterly, 20, 61–77.
42.
MarienS.HoogheM.QuintelierE. (2010). Inequalities in non-institutionalised forms of political participation: A multi-level analysis of 25 countries. Political Studies, 58(1), 187–213.
43.
MinxinP. (1994). From reform to revolution: The demise of communism in China and the Soviet Union. Harvard University Press.
44.
MistryJ. J.JalalA. (2012). An empirical analysis of the relationship between e-government and corruption. The International Journal of Digital Accounting Research, 12(8), 145–176.
45.
MorozovE. (2011). Whither internet control?Journal of Democracy, 22(2), 62–74.
46.
MurdockG.GoldingP. (1989). Information poverty and political inequality: citizenship in the age of privatized communications. Journal of Communication, 39(3), 180–195.
47.
NagelH. H. (1987). On the estimation of optical flow: Relations between different approaches and some new results. Artificial Intelligence, 33(3), 299–324.
48.
National Telecommunications & Information Administration (NTIA). (2000). Falling through the net: Toward digital inclusion. U.S. Department of Commerce.
49.
NorrisP. (2005). The impact of the Internet on political activism: Evidence from Europe. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 1, 20–39.
50.
PutnamR. (2000). Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. Culture and politics. Palgrave Macmillan.
RobertsK. M. (2002). Social inequalities without class cleavages in Latin America’s neoliberal era. Studies in Comparative International Development, 36, 3–33.
53.
SeifertJ. W.ChungJ. (2009). Using e-government to reinforce government—citizen relationships: comparing government reform in the United States and China. Social Science Computer Review, 27(1), 3–23.
54.
ShahD. V.ChoJ.EvelandW. P.JrKwakN. (2005). Information and expression in a digital age: Modeling internet effects on civic participation. Communication Research, 32(5), 531–565.
55.
ShahD. V.McLeodJ. M.YoonS. H. (2001). Communication, context, and community: An exploration of print, broadcast, and Internet influences. Communication Research, 28(4), 464–506.
56.
ShiT. (1997). Political participation in Beijing. Harvard University Press.
57.
TaoD.ChenM. (1999). Political participation in modern China. Zhejiang Renmin Press.
58.
TichenorP. J.DonohueG. A.OlienC. N. (1970). Mass media flow and differential growth in knowledge. Public Opinion Quarterly, 34(2), 159–170.
59.
TsaiL. L.XuY. (2018). Outspoken insiders: Political connections and citizen participation in authoritarian China. Political Behavior, 40(3), 629–657.
60.
TsuiL. (2003). The Panopticon as the antithesis of a space of freedom: Control and regulation of the Internet in China. China Information, 17(2), 65–82.
61.
TufekciZ.WilsonC. (2012). Social media and the decision to participate in political protest: Observations from Tahrir Square. Journal of Communication, 62(2), 363–379.
62.
UslanerE. M. (2004). Trust and corruption. In LambsdorffJ. G.TaubeM.SchrammM. (Eds.), The new institutional economics of corruption (pp.76–92). Routledge.
63.
VerbaS.NieN. H. (1972). Participation in America. Harper & Row.
64.
VerbaS.SchlozmanK.BradyH. E. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Harvard University Press.
65.
VicenteM. R.NovoA. (2014). An empirical analysis of e-participation. The role of social networks and e-government over citizens’ online engagement. Government Information Quarterly, 31(3), 379–387.
66.
WestD. M. (2004). E-government and the transformation of service delivery and citizen attitudes. Public Administration Review, 64(1), 15–27.
67.
WuJ.GuoD. (2015). Measuring E-government performance of provincial government website in China with slacks-based efficiency measurement. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 96, 25–31.
68.
XiaoQ. (2011). The battle for the Chinese Internet. Journal of Democracy, 22(2), 47–61.
69.
XuP.YeY.ZhangM. (2018). Assessing political participation on the Internet in contemporary China. Chinese Journal of Communication, 11, 243–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/17544750.2018.1445119
70.
YangG. (2007). How do Chinese civic associations respond to the internet? Findings from a survey. The China Quarterly, 189, 122–143.
71.
YangG. (2009). The internet as cultural form: Technology and the human condition in China. Knowledge Technology & Policy, 22(2), 109–115.
72.
YeY.XuP.ZhangM. (2017). Social media, public discourse and civic engagement in modern China. Telematics and Informatics, 34(3), 705–714.
73.
ZhangM. (2015). The rise of participatory politics in China: An empirical study of Chinese Internet users’ political psychology and behavior. Huazhong University of Science and Technology Press.
74.
ZhouB. (2011). Media contact, public participation and political efficacy in crises: Using the Xiamen PX incident as an empirical research. Open Times, 5, 123–130.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
