How to inspire employees to develop proficiency in their adaptability to fulfill new job requirements and what benefits can organizations derive from employee empowerment serve as two core questions in management literature. However, the linkage between empowerment and adaptive performance, let alone their interactions with other factors, is seldom studied. This article fills in this gap by examining the relationships among empowerment role identity, adaptive performance, authentic leadership, and leader-member exchange (LMX). Using data collected from a sample of 326 employee-supervisor dyads in China’s information, communication, and technology (ICT) industry, this article argues that LMX mediates the positive correlation between employees’ empowerment role identity and their adaptive performance. By adopting the Johnson-Neyman technique, this article further showcases the exact extent to which authentic leadership facilitates, counteracts, and undermines the mediating role that LMX plays in helping employees with empowerment needs to achieve greater adaptability.
AlexanderC.LopezR. P. (2018). A thematic analysis of self-described authentic leadership behaviors among experienced nurse executives. The Journal of Nursing Administration, 48(1), 38–43.
2.
AlilyyaniB.WongC. A.CummingsG. (2018). Antecedents, mediators, and outcomes of authentic leadership in healthcare: A systematic review. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 83, 34–64.
3.
AllworthE.HeskethB. (1997). Adaptive performance: Updating the criterion to cope with change [Conference session]. Paper Presented at the 2nd Australian Industrial and Organizational Psychology Conference, Melbourne.
4.
AllworthE.HeskethB. (1999). Construct-oriented biodata: Capturing change-related and contextually relevant future performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 7(2), 97–111.
5.
AndersonC.JohnO. P.KeltnerD. (2012). The personal sense of power. Journal of Personality, 80(2), 313–344.
6.
AtwaterL.CarmeliA. (2009). Leader–member exchange, feelings of energy, and involvement in creative work. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(3), 264–275.
7.
AvolioB. J.GardnerW. L. (2005). Authentic leadership development: Getting to the root of positive forms of leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 16(3), 315–338.
8.
AvolioB. J.GardnerW. L.WalumbwaF. O.LuthansF.MayD. R. (2004). Unlocking the mask: A look at the process by which authentic leaders impact follower attitudes and behaviors. The Leadership Quarterly, 15(6), 801–823.
9.
BakkerA. B.DemeroutiE. (2017). Job demands-resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(3), 273–285.
10.
CampbellD. J. (2000). The proactive employee: Managing workplace initiative. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 14(3), 52–66.
11.
Charbonnier-VoirinA.RousselP. (2012). Adaptive performance: A new scale to measure individual performance in organizations. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences/Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l’Administration, 29(3), 280–293.
12.
ChenG.ThomasB.WallaceJ. C. (2005). A multilevel examination of the relationships among training outcomes, mediating regulatory processes, and adaptive performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(5), 827–841.
13.
Chia HueiW.SharonK. P. (2013). Thinking and acting in anticipation: A review of research on proactive behavior. Advances in Psychological Science, 21(4), 679–700.
14.
Clapp-SmithR.VogelgesangG. R.AveyJ. B. (2009). Authentic leadership and positive psychological capital: The mediating role of trust at the group level of analysis. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 15(3), 227–240.
15.
DemeroutiE.BakkerA. B.NachreinerF.SchaufeliW. B. (2001). The job demands-resources model of burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 499–512.
16.
DetertJ. R.BurrisE. R. (2007). Leadership behavior and employee voice: Is the door really open?Academy of Management Journal, 50(4), 869–884.
17.
DunbarN. E.AbraG. (2010). Observations of dyadic power in interpersonal interaction. Communication Monographs, 77(4), 657–684.
18.
GardnerW. L.AvolioB. J.LuthansF.MayD. R.WalumbwaF. (2005). “Can you see the real me?” A self-based model of authentic leader and follower development. The Leadership Quarterly, 16(3), 343–372.
19.
GardnerW. L.CogliserC. C.DavisK. M.DickensM. P. (2011). Authentic leadership: A review of the literature and research agenda. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(6), 1120–1145.
20.
GeorgeB.SimsP.McLeanA. N.MayerD. (2007). Discovering your authentic leadership. Harvard Business Review, 85(2), 129–130, 132-8, 157.
21.
GeorgeW. (2003). Authentic leadership: Rediscovering the secrets to creating lasting value. Jossey-Bass.
22.
GerstnerC. R.DayD. V. (1997). Meta-analytic review of leader–member exchange theory: Correlates and construct issues. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(6), 827–844.
23.
GraenG. B.ScanduraT. A. (1987). Toward a psychology of dyadic organizing. Research in Organizational Behavior, 9, 175–208.
24.
GriffinB.HeskethB. (2003). Adaptable behaviours for successful work and career adjustment. Australian Journal of Psychology, 55(2), 65–73.
25.
GriffinM. A.NealA.ParkerS. K. (2007). A new model of work role performance: Positive behavior in uncertain and interdependent contexts. Academy of Management Journal, 50(2), 327–347.
26.
HairJ. F.BlackW.BabinB.AndersonR. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Prentice Hall.
27.
HayesA. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. The Guilford Press.
28.
HayesA. F. (2015). An index and test of linear moderated mediation. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 50(1), 1–22.
29.
HeskethB.NealA. (1999). Technology and performance. In IlgenD. R.PulakosE. D. (Eds.), The changing nature of performance: Implications for staffing, motivation, and development (pp. 21–55). Jossey-Bass.
30.
HobfollS. E. (1988). The ecology of stress. Hemisphere Publishing Corporation.
31.
HobfollS. E.HalbeslebenJ.NeveuJ. P.WestmanM. (2018). Conservation of resources in the organizational context: The reality of resources and their consequences. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 5, 103–128.
32.
IliesR.MorgesonF. P.NahrgangJ. D. (2005). Authentic leadership and eudaemonic well-being: Understanding leader–follower outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 16(3), 373–394.
33.
IliesR.NahrgangJ. D.MorgesonF. P. (2007). Leader-member exchange and citizenship behaviors: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(1), 269–277.
34.
JundtD. K.ShossM. K.HuangJ. L. (2015). Individual adaptive performance in organizations: A review. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36(S1), S53–S71.
KernisM. H. (2003). Optimal self-esteem and authenticity: Separating fantasy from reality. Psychological Inquiry, 14(1), 83–89.
37.
KimS. L.HanS.SonS. Y.YunS. (2017). Exchange ideology in supervisor-subordinate dyads, LMX, and knowledge sharing: A social exchange perspective. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 34(1), 147–172.
38.
LeroyH.AnseelF.GardnerW. L.SelsL. (2015). Authentic leadership, authentic followership, basic need satisfaction, and work role performance: A cross-level study. Journal of Management, 41(6), 1677–1697.
39.
LiuS. M.LiaoJ. Q.WeiH. (2015). Authentic leadership and whistleblowing: Mediating roles of psychological safety and personal identification. Journal of Business Ethics, 131(1), 107–119.
40.
MumfordM. D.ScottG. M.GaddisB.StrangeJ. M. (2002). Leading creative people: Orchestrating expertise and relationships. The Leadership Quarterly, 13(6), 705–750.
41.
NeiderL. L.SchriesheimC. A. (2011). The authentic leadership inventory (ALI): Development and empirical tests. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(6), 1146–1164.
42.
NiessenC.JimmiesonN. L. (2016). Threat of resource loss: The role of self-regulation in adaptive task performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(3), 450–462.
43.
O’brienR. M. (2007). A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors. Quality & Quantity, 41(5), 673–690.
44.
ParkS.ParkS. (2019). Employee adaptive performance and its antecedents: Review and synthesis. Human Resource Development Review, 18(3), 294–324.
45.
PulakosE. D.AradS.DonovanM. A.PlamondonK. E. (2000). Adaptability in the workplace: Development of a taxonomy of adaptive performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(4), 612–624.
46.
RileyA.BurkeP. J. (1995). Identities and self-verification in the small group. Social Psychology Quarterly, 58(2), 61–73.
47.
ScanduraT. A. (1999). Rethinking leader–member exchange: An organizational justice perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 10(1), 25–40.
48.
ScanduraT. A.GraenG. B. (1984). Moderating effects of initial leader–member exchange status on the effects of a leadership intervention. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(3), 428–436.
49.
ScottR. K. (1995). Creative employees: A challenge to managers. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 29(1), 64–71.
50.
ScottS. G.BruceR. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580–607.
51.
StrykerS.BurkeP. J. (2000). The past, present, and future of an identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63, 284–297.
52.
SutherlandL.MarkauskaiteL. (2012). Examining the role of authenticity in supporting the development of professional identity: An example from teacher education. Higher Education, 64(6), 747–766.
53.
van DierendonckD. (2011). Servant leadership: A review and synthesis. Journal of Management, 37(4), 1228–1261.
54.
VolmerJ.SpurkD.NiessenC. (2012). Leader–member exchange (LMX), job autonomy, and creative work involvement. The Leadership Quarterly, 23(3), 456–465.
55.
WalumbwaF. O.AvolioB. J.GardnerW. L.WernsingT. S.PetersonS. J. (2008). Authentic leadership: Development and validation of a theory-based measure. Journal of Management, 34(1), 89–126.
56.
WihlerA.MeursJ. A.WiesmannD.TrollL.BlickleG. (2017). Extraversion and adaptive performance: Integrating trait activation and socioanalytic personality theories at work. Personality and Individual Differences, 116, 133–138.
57.
ZhangX.BartolK. M. (2010). Linking empowering leadership and employee creativity: The influence of psychological empowerment, intrinsic motivation, and creative process engagement. Academy of Management Journal, 53(1), 107–128.
