The Weberian Politics-Administration Dichotomy in Time of Global Crisis: Neutral Competence or Cadre Organizations

Abstract

The 2020 Coronavirus pandemic placed enormous pressures on local, regional, and national governments to remain responsive, open, and equitable when developing solutions to protect the public. The focus of this article is an examination of these challenges, the insufficient preparedness, and the resulting response to the pandemic through the lens of the Weberian politics-administration dichotomy. Despite the fact that China does not practice a Weberian democratic form of government, the nation has managed to become a global economic powerhouse. Through a high degree of centralized planning, China has implemented market-based economic reforms synchronous with sustained socialist practices. However, this system also presents unique challenges for effective governance. Some of these challenges are the result of the governmental system in China, the relationship between the central government and local cadre organizations. For China to continue to grow as a global leader, leadership will need to balance the pros and cons of the dichotomy between the centralized political planning and the local administration by promoting more flexibility in governance structure and the central-local relationship.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Asian Lineage Avian Influenza A(H7N9) Virus. (2018, December 7). Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/flu/avianflu/h7n9-virus.htm

Bai

& Liu

(2020). China's governance model and system in transition. Journal of Contemporary East Asia Studies, 9(1), 65–82.

Brennan

M. J.

& Koven

S. G.

(2009). Hurricane Katrina: Preparedness, Response, and the Politics, Administration Dichotomy. In Farazmand

(Ed.), Bureaucracy and Administration (pp. 253–268). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

Constitution of the People's Republic of China. (2004, March 14). Retrieved from http://www.npc.gov.cn/zgrdw/englishnpc/Constitution/node_2825.htm

Edwards

G. C.

(2001, March 1). Why Not the Best? The Loyalty-Competence Trade-Off in Presidential Appointments. Retrieved from https://www.brookings.edu/articles/why-not-the-best-the-loyalty-competence-trade-off-in-presidential-appointments/

Fry

B. R.

& Nigro

L. G.

(1996). Max Weber and US public administration: the administrator as neutral servant. Journal of Management History, 2(1), 37–46.

Guo

& Jiang

(2017). China's ‘New Normal': from Social Control to Social Governance. Journal of Chinese Political Science, 22(3), 327–340.

Holzer

& Zhang

(2009). Introduction to the Special Issue on Comparative Chinese/American Public Administration. Public Administration Review, 69(S1), S5–S12.

Horton

(2020, April 22). Confidence in the French government's handling of Covid-19 drops sharply - poll. Retrieved from https://www.rfi.fr/en/france/20200422-france-coronavirus-low-confidence-government-opinion-poll-confinement-school-economy

10.

Hunt

M. H.

(2014). The World Transformed: 1945 to the Present (2nd ed.). London: Oxford University Press.

11.

Jing

& Savas

E. S.

(2009). Managing Collaborative Service Delivery: Comparing China and the United States. Public Administration Review, 69(S1), S101–S107.

12.

(2014). The Governance of China (Vol. 1). Beijing: Intercultural Press.

13.

Kamps

B. S.

& Hoffmann

(Eds.). (2003). SARS Reference. Flying Publisher.

14.

Lipsky

(2010). Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services (30th Anniversary Expanded Edition). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

15.

Pierce

J. R.

& Schott

P. K.

(2016). The Surprisingly Swift Decline of US Manufacturing Employment. American Economic Review, 106(7), 1632–1662.

16.

Qiu

, Chu

, Mao

& Wu

(2018). The Impacts on Health, Society, and Economy of SARS and H7N9 Outbreaks in China: A Case Comparison Study. Journal of Environmental & Public Health, 1–7.

17.

Rothstein

(2015). The Chinese Paradox of High Growth and Low Quality of Government: The Cadre Organization Meets Max Weber. Governance, 28(4), 533–548.

18.

Shan

P. F.

(2020). Assessing Li Dazhao's Role in the New Cultural Movement. In Li

& Fang

(Eds.), A Century of Student Movements in China: The Mountain Movers, 1919–2019. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.

19.

Uwizeyimana

D. E.

(2013). The Politics-Administration Dichotomy: Was Woodrow Wilson Misunderstood or Misquoted? Journal of US-China Public Administration, 10(2), 165–173.

20.

Vong

, O'Leary

& Feng

(2014). Early response to the emergence of influenza A(H7N9) virus in humans in China: the central role of prompt information sharing and public communication. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 92(4), 303–308.

21.

Wilson

(1887). The Study of Administration. Political Science Quarterly, 2(2), 197–222.

22.

Womack

(2017). Xi Jinping and Continuing Political Reform in China. Journal of Chinese Political Science, 22(3), 393–406.

23.

Zakharov

A. V.

(2016). The loyalty-competence trade-off in dictatorships and outside options for subordinates. The Journal of Politics, 78(2), 457–466.

24.

Zhao

(2010). The China Model: can it replace the Western model of modernization? Journal of Contemporary China, 19(65), 419–436.

25.

Zhao

& Peters

B. G.

(2009). The State of the State: Comparing Governance in China and the United States. Public Administration Review, 69(S1), S122–S128.