Wheelchair Accessibility—Living the Experience: Function in the Community

Abstract

In this study, we explored the perceptions of three people who use wheelchairs (an elderly person, a mid-life business owner, and a child) about the current architectural accessibility issues in their communities. Employing naturalistic inquiry design, we also explored the participants’ perceptions about the impact of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) on their access to public goods and services. The data were generated from in-depth interviews. The data revealed that the participants were not well-informed about the ADA standards and, therefore, were uninformed of their civil rights, although they were knowledgeable about architectural accessibility problems and recent improvements. They also identified issues of social roles and relationships relative to accessibility and physical barriers. Understanding the perceptions of three individuals from different age ranges may have implications for the role of rehabilitation personnel, and occupational therapists in particular, in providing education and empowerment to bridge entry or re-entry into community settings for people who rely on wheelchairs for mobility.

Keywords

context physical environment Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA)empowerment

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American Occupational Therapy Association (AOTA). (1996). Uniform terminology for occupational therapy (3rd ed). In: Reference Manual of the Official Documents of the American Occupational Therapy Association, Inc, 6th ed, pp. 273–293.

American Occupational Therapy Association. (1995A). Occupational performance: Occupational therapy's definition of function. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 49, 1019–1020.

American Occupational Therapy Association. (1995B). Position paper: Broadening the construct of independence. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 49(10), 1014.

American Occupational Therapy Association. (1995C). Position paper: The psychosocial core of occupational therapy. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 49(10), 1021–1022.

American Occupational Therapy Association. (1995D). Occupational therapy: A profession in support of full inclusion. In: Reference Manual of the Official Documents of the American Occupational Therapy Association, Inc, 6th edition, p. 149.

American Occupational Therapy Association. (1994). Standards of practice for occupational therapy. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 48(12), 1039–1043.

American Occupational Therapy Association. (1993). Core values and attitudes of occupational therapy practice. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 47(12), 1085–1086.

American Occupational Therapy Association. (1993). Position paper: Occupational therapy and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 47(12), 1083–1084.

Department of Justice. (1991, July 26). Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Disability by Public Accomodations and in Commercial Facilities; Final Rule (DOJ 28CFR Part 36; No 1531-1591), Federal Register 35544-35691.

10.

Cope

J.G.

, Allred

L.J.

, & Morsell

J.M.

(1991). Signs as deterrents of illegal parking in spaces designated for individuals with physical disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24(1), 59–63.

11.

Cope

J.G.

, & Allred

L.J.

(1990). Illegal parking in handicapped zones: Demographic observations and review of the literature. Rehabilitation Psychology, 35(4), 249–257.

12.

Cross

E.W.

(1993). Implementing the Americans with Disabilities Act. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 93(3), 273–275.

13.

DeJong

(1979). Independent living: From social movement to analytic paradigm. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 60, 435–446.

14.

Dunn

, Brown

, McClain

L.H.

, & Westman

(1994). The ecology of human performance: A contextual perspective on human occupation. In: Royeen

C.B.

, Ed. AOTA's Self-Study Series—The Practice of the Future: Putting Occupation Back into Therapy. Bethesda: American Occupational Therapy Association.

15.

Ferguson

P.M.

, Ferguson

D.L.

, & Taylor

S.J.

(1992). Interpreting Disability: A Qualitative Reader. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

16.

Great Plains Disability, and Business Technical Assistance Center. (1993, Winter). Public awareness of the ADA. TADAR, 2(a), 4.

17.

Hasselkus

B.R.

(1995). Beyond ethnography: Expanding our understanding and criteria for qualitative research. The Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 15(2), 75–84.

18.

Law

, Cooper

, Strong

, Stewart

, Rigby

, & Letts

(1996). The Person-Environment-Occupation Model: A transactive approach to occupational performance. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 63(1), 9–23.

19.

Lincoln

Y.S.

, & Guba

E.G.

(1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

20.

McClain

, Beringer

, Kuhnert

, Priest

, Wilkes

, Wilkinson

, & Wyrick

(1993). Restaurant wheelchair accessibility. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 47(7), 619–623.

21.

McClain

, & Todd

(1990). Food store accessibility. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 44(6), 487–491.

22.

Parmet

W.E.

(1990). Discrimination and disability: The challenges of the ADA. Law Medicine and Health Care, 18, 331–344.

23.

Reed

K.L.

(1992). History of federal legislation for persons with disabilities. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 46(5), 397–408.

24.

Rogers

J.C.

(1982). The spirit of independence: The evolution of a philosophy. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 36(11), 709–715.

25.

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (1993). Research Plan for the National Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research (Publication No. 93-3509). Washington, DC.

26.

U.S. General Accounting Office: Program Evaluation and Methodology Division (1994). ADA: Effects of the Law on Access. (GAO/PEMD-94-14). Washington, DC.