The “Qual-OT” is an assessment tool that was developed to help define quality of life for the field of occupational therapy. The questionnaire was given to practicing occupational therapists (n — 194), people with spinal cord injuries (n = 78), and people with multiple sclerosis (n = 133). The information derived was used to test the premise that quality of life can be described uniformly, and that it is a construct about which therapists and clients have the same general idea. Factor analyses of the original questions yielded seven distinct factors. Single factor ANOVAs revealed that there were differences among the diagnostic groups on these factors. These differences showed that, for the most part, practicing occupational therapists obtained higher scores on the seven factors than the other two groups.
BergnerM.BobbittR. A.KresselS.PollardW. E.GilsonB. S., & MorrisJ. R. (1976). The sickness impact profile: Conceptual formulation and methodology for the development of health status measure. International Journal of Health Services, 6(3), 393–415.
4.
BernheimJ. L., & BuyseM. (1983). The anamnestic comparative self-assessment for measuring the subjective quality of life of cancer patients. Journal of Psychological Oncology, 1, 25–38.
5.
BradburnN. M., & CaplovitzD. (1965). Reports on happiness. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.
6.
BremerB. A., & McCauleyC. R. (1986). Quality of life measures: Hospital interviews versus home questionnaire. Health Psychology, 5(2), 171–177.
7.
CampbellA. (1976). Subjective measures of well-being. American Psychologist, 2, 117–124.
8.
CampbellA.ConverseP., & RodgersW. (1976). The quality of American life. New York: Russell Sage.
9.
CantrilH. (1965). The patterns of human concerns. Rahway, NJ: Quinn & Boden Co.
10.
CohenC. (1982). On the quality of life: Some philosophical reflections. Circulation, 66(3), 29–33.
11.
EvansD. R.BrunsJ. E.RobinsonW. E., & GarrettQ. J. (1985). The quality of life questionnaire: A multidimensional measure. American Journal of Community Psychology, 13(3), 305–322.
12.
GillW. M. (1984). Subjective well being properties of an instrument for measuring this in the chronically ill. Social Science and Medicine, 18(8), 683–691.
13.
HeinrichR. L., & SchagC. C. (1987). The psychosocial impact of cancer: Cancer patients and healthy controls. Journal of Psychosocial Oncology, 5(3), 75–91.
14.
KerlingerF. (1986). Foundations of behavioral research, 3rd ed.New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
15.
KirchmanM. M. (1986). Measuring quality of life. The Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 6, 21–32.
16.
KirkR. E. (1982). Experimental design. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Co.
17.
LuiB. (1973). Quality of life indicators in the United States: 1970. Kansas City, MO: Midwest Research Institute.
18.
MehnertT.KraussH.NadlerR., & BoydM. (1990). Correlates of life satisfaction in those with disabling conditions. Rehabilitation Psychology, 35(1), 3–17.
19.
MichalosA. C. (1980). Satisfaction and happiness. Social Indicators Research, 8, 385–422.
20.
PadillaG., & GrantM. M. (1985). Quality of life as a cancer nursing outcome variable. Advances in Nursing Science, 8(1), 45–60.
21.
SchalockR. L.KeithK. D.HoffmanK., & KaranQ. C. (1989). Quality of life: Its measurement and use. Mental Retardation, 27(1), 25–31.
22.
SchipperH., & LevittM. (1985). Measuring quality of life: Risks and benefits. Cancer Treatment Reports, 69, 1115–1123.
23.
SchuesslerK., & FisherG. (1985). Quality of life research and sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 11, 129–148.
24.
StensmanR. (1985). Severely mobility disabled people assess the quality of their lives. Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 17, 87–99.
25.
TromblyC. A. (1989). Stroke. Occupational therapy for physical dysfunction. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, p. 460.
26.
WilliamsA. (1988). Do we really need to measure the quality of life?British Journal of Hospital Medicine, 3, 181.
27.
YerxaE. J., & BaumS. (1986). Engagement in daily occupations and life satisfaction among people with spinal cord injuries. The Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 6(5), 271–283.
