In sensory integration treatment, the child and therapist manage challenging tasks in an interdependent process of action and response. This descriptive and relational study examined patterns of child-therapist action and interaction during the management of challenge in videotaped segments of the early minutes of treatment. Two dimensions emerged from these patterns: playfulness and task-orientation. Observer therapist judges perceived that a match between the task challenge and the child's ability was achieved when the child was working hard, showing initiative, and obviously enjoying the process. Simultaneously, the therapist was providing positive support, but not directly intervening to manipulate the child or the task. The validity of the measurement of challenge management is discussed.
AmbadyN., & RosenthalR. (1992). Thin slices of expressive behavior as predictors of interpersonal consequences: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 256–274.
2.
AyresA. J. (1972a). Sensory integration and learning disorders. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.
3.
AyresA. J. (1972b). Improving academic scores through sensory integration. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 5, 24–28.
4.
AyresA. J., & MaillouxZ. K. (1983). Possible pubertal effect on therapeutic gains in an autistic girl. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 37, 535–540.
5.
BenjaminL. S. (1974). Structural analysis of social behavior. Psychological Review, 81, 392–425.
6.
BenjaminL. S. (1977). Structural analysis of a family in therapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 45, 391–406.
7.
CampbellD. T., & FiskeD. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81–105.
8.
ClarkF. A., & PierceD. (1986). Synopsis of pediatric occupational therapy effectiveness. In Proceedings of Occupational Therapy far Maternal and Child Health Conference (Vol. 1; pp. 226–244). Washington, DC: Division of Maternal and Child Health, Department of Health and Human Services.
9.
CohenJ. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 37–46.
10.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis far the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
11.
CosterW.Tickle-DegnenL., & ArmentaL. (1995). Therapist-child interaction during sensory integration treatment: Development and testing of a research tool. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 15, 17–35.
12.
GalloG. M. (1991). Interrater reliability study of therapists' ratings of the therapeutic interaction. Unpublished master's thesis. Boston University.
13.
KawarM. (1973). The effects of sensorimotor therapy on dichotic listening in children with learning disabilities. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 27, 226–231.
14.
KimballJ. G. (1988). The emphasis is on integration, not sensory. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 92, 401–411.
15.
KoomarJ. A., & BundyA. C. (1991). The art and science of creating direct intervention from theory. In FisherA. G.MurrayE. A., & BundyA. C. (Eds.), Sensory integration: Theory and practice (pp. 251–314). Philadelphia: F. A. Davis.
16.
LindquistJ. E.MackW., & ParhamL. D. (1982). A synthesis of occupational behavior and sensory integration concepts in theory and practice, Part 2. Clinical applications. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 36, 433–437.
17.
OttenbacherK. (1982). Sensory integration therapy: Affect or effect?American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 36, 571–578.
18.
OttenbacherK. (1991). Research on sensory integration: Empirical perspectives and progress. In FisherA. G.MurrayE. A., & BundyA. C. (Eds.), Sensory integration: Theory and practice (pp. 251–314). Philadelphia: F. A. Davis.
19.
OttenbacherK.ShortM. A., & WatsonP. J. (1979). Nystagmus duration changes of learning disabled children during sensory integrative therapy. Perceptual Motor Skills, 48, 1159–1164.
20.
PittengerR. E.HockettC. F., & DanehyJ. J. (1960). The first five minutes. Ithaca, NY: Matineau Press.
21.
PrattM. W.KerigP.CowanP. A., & CowanC. P. (1988). Mothers and fathers teaching 3-year-olds: Authoritative parenting and adult scaffolding of young children's learning. Developmental Psychology, 24, 832–839.
22.
RogoffB. (1982). Integrating context and cognitive development. In LambM. E.BrownA. L., & RogoffB. (Eds.), Advances in developmental psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 125–170). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
23.
RogoffB. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking. New York: Oxford University Press.
24.
RosenthalR. (1982). Conducting judgment studies. In SchererK. R., & EkmanP. (Eds.), Handbook of methods in nonverbal behavior research (pp. 287–361). New York: Cambridge University Press.
25.
RosenthalR., & RosnowR. L. (1991). Essentials of behavioral research (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
26.
ShroutP. E., & FleissJ. L. (1979). Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 420–428.
27.
Tickle-DegnenL. (1988). Perspectives on the status of sensory integration theory. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 42, 427–433.
28.
WoodD.BrunerJ. S., & RossG. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17, 89–100.
29.
WoodD.WoodH., & MiddletonD. (1978). An experimental evaluation of four face-to-face teaching strategies. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 1, 131–147.
