Following the completion of a study of the efficacy of sensory integration (SI) treatment compared with tutoring, the question raised was whether a greater difference between the two groups would exist after a period of time had elapsed after treatment ended. Twenty-two of the original 29 subjects completed follow-up assessment two years after the completion of their treatment. Only one significant difference between the two groups was seen at follow-up: The gross motor performance of the group who received SI treatment was significantly greater than that of children who received tutoring. There was no difference between the groups on measures of reading skills, fine motor skills, visual motor skills, or behavioral factors. There were no significant correlations between the amount of improvement a child made during treatment and the maintenance of the gains.
AckermanP. T.DykmanR. A., & PetersJ. E. (1977a). Learning-disabled boys as adolescents. Journal of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry, 16, 296–313.
2.
AckermanP. T.DykmanR. A., & PetersJ. E. (1977b). Teenage status of hyperactive and non-hyperactive learning disabled boys. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 47, 577–596.
3.
AyresA. J. (1972). Southern California Sensory Integration Tests, manual. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.
4.
AyresA. J. (1980). Southern California Motor Accuracy Test—Revised 1980 manual. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.
5.
BeeryK. E. (1982). Revised administration, scoring, and teaching manual for the Developmental Test of Visual-Motor Integration. Chicago: Follett Publishing Company.
6.
BlishenB. R., & McRobertsH. A. (1976). A revised socioeconomic index for occupations in Canada. Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology, 13, 71–79.
7.
BruininksR. H. (1978). Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency, examiner's manual. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
8.
CermakS. A., & HendersonA. (1989). The efficacy of sensory integration procedures. Sensory Integration Quarterly, 17(3), 1–5; 17(4), 1–6.
9.
ClarkF.MaillouxZ., & ParhamD. (1989). Sensory integration and children with learning disabilities. In Nuse-PrattP. & AllenA. (Eds.), Occupational therapy for children (pp. 457–509). Toronto: CV Mosby Co.
10.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd Ed.). Hillside, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
11.
FisherA. G. (1992). Functional measures, part 1: What is function, what should we measure, and how should we measure it?American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 46, 183–281.
12.
GoyetteC. H.ConnersC. K., & UlrichR. F. (1978). Normative data on Revised Conners Parent and Teacher Rating Scales. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 62, 221–236.
13.
HelperM. M. (1980). Followup of children with minimal brain dysfunction: Outcomes and predictors. In RieH. E. & RieE. D. (Eds.), Handbook of minimal brain dysfunctions—A critical view (pp. 75–114). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
KaplanB. J.PolatajkoH. J.WilsonB. N., & FarisP. D. (1993). Re-examination of sensory integration treatment: A combination of two efficacy studies. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 26, 342–347.
16.
KurzweilS. R. (1992). Developmental reading disorder: Predictors of outcome in adolescents who receive early diagnosis and treatment. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 13, 399–404.
17.
LosseA.HendersonS. E.EllimanD.HallD.KnightE., & JongmansM. (1991). Clumsiness in children—do they grow out of it? A 10-year followup study. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 33, 55–68.
18.
MagrunW. M. (1988). Clinical decision making in treatment of learning disabled children. Occupational Therapy in Health Care, 5, 189–208.
19.
OrsiniD. L.FletcherJ. M., & SatzP. (1984). Developmental context of performance deficits in disabled learners. In LevineM. D. & SatzP. (Eds.), Middle childhood: Development & dysfunction (pp. 63–86). Baltimore: University Park Press.
20.
OttenbacherK. (1982). Statistical power and research in occupational therapy. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 2, 13–25.
21.
PolatajkoH.KaplanB. J., & WilsonB. N. (1992). Sensory integration treatment for children with learning disabilities: Its status 20 years later. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 12, 323–341.
22.
PolatajkoH.LawM.MillerJ.SchafferR., & MacnabJ. (1991). The effect of a sensory integration program on academic achievement, motor performance and self-esteem in children identified as learning disabled: Results of a clinical trial. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 11, 155–176.
23.
SilverA. A. (1984). Psychotherapy in children with developmental dysfunction. In LevineM. D. & SatzP. (Eds.), Middle childhood: Development & dysfunction (pp. 467–486). Baltimore: University Park Press.
24.
Tickle-DegnenL. (1988). Perspectives on the status of sensory integration theory. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 42, 427–433.
25.
WilsonB. N.KaplanB. J.FellowesS.GruchyC., & FarisP. D. (1992). The efficacy of sensory integration treatment compared to tutoring. Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 12, 1–36.
26.
WoodcockR. W., & JohnsonM. B. (1977). Woodcock-Johnson Psycho-educational Battery. Hingham, MA: Teaching Resources Corp.
27.
YerxaE. J. (1991). Seeking a relevant, ethical, and realistic way of knowing for occupational therapy. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 45, 199–203.
