Intrarater and Interrater Objectivity of the Erhardt Developmental Prehension Assessment among Trained and Untrained Examiners

Abstract

Seven trained and eight untrained examiners rated the videotaped performance of one child with the Erhardt Developmental Prehension Assessment to determine intrarater and interrater objectivity. Objectivity is one component of reliability. Reliability studies reflect errors because of subject performance changes and rater inconsistencies in applying scoring criteria. Objectivity, through the use of videotaped performances, investigates those errors in assessments caused by the inconsistency of applying scoring criteria. Findings demonstrated high levels of intrarater objectivity and moderate to high levels of interrater objectivity for trained examiners. Training led to significantly increased correlation coefficients for interrater tests. Results of the study are discussed in relation to possible sources of instability of scores, the use of the assessment in the clinic, and directions future research could take in further development of this instrument.

Keywords

fine motor skills test reliability training effects evaluation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Dunn

(1983). Critique of the Erhardt Developmental Prehension Assessment. Physical and Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 3(4).

Erhardt

R. P.

(1982). Developmental hand dysfunction: Theory, assessment, treatment. Laurel, MO: Ramsco.

Erhardt

R. P.

Beatty

P. A.

, & Hertsgaard

D. M.

(1981). A developmental prehension assessment for handicapped children. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 35, 237–242.

Erhardt Developmental Products. (1982). Administration of the Erhardt Developmental Prehension Assessment [Videocassette]. Laurel, MO: Ramsco.

Fisher

(1991, October). Adjustments for rater severity by Rasch analysis. Paper presented at the Measurement Research Symposium sponsored by the American Occupational Therapy Foundation and the Center for Research, University of Illinois at Chicago.

Henderson

(1991, September 3). Memorandum to all occupational therapy program directors from the chairman of the pediatric core curriculum committee. Rockville, MD: The American Occupational Therapy Association.

Marascuilo

L. A.

, & Serlin

R. C.

(1988). Statistical methods for the social and behavioral sciences. New York: W. H. Freeman.

Pollock

Law

, & Jones

(1991). The reliability and validity of a revised version of the Erhardt Developmental Prehension Assessment. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 58(2), 77–84.

Safrit

M. J.

(1986). Introduction to measurement in physical education and exercise science. St. Louis: Times Mirror/Mosby College.

10.

Tomacelli

D. L.

, & Palisano

R. J.

(1990). Concurrent and construct validity of the Erhardt Developmental Prehension Assessment and the Peabody Development Fine Motor Scale. Pediatric Physical Therapy, 2(1), 15–19.