Although survey research methods have been accepted in the scientific community, applications of telephone interview methods in occupational therapy research and program evaluation studies remain limited. The benefits of telephone interview methods include high response rates, ability to ask exploratory questions, cost-effectiveness, and ability to branch questions to subsets of a study population. Through the process of standardizing research instruments and administration procedures, the reliability of data collected by telephone can be increased substantially. The evaluation of an interview instrument is a critical aspect of study design. Details of an evaluation study and strategies to enhance the process of assessing interview instruments are provided.
BabbieE. R. (1973). Survey research methods. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
2.
CroweT. K. (1989). Pediatric assessments: A survey of their use by occupational therapists in northwestern school systems. The Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 9, 273–286.
3.
DickersonA., & KaplanS. H. (1991). A comparison of craft use and academic preparation in craft modalities. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 45, 11–17.
4.
DijkstraW., & Van der ZouwenJ. (1982). Response behavior in the survey interview. London: Academic.
5.
DillmanD. (1978). Mail and telephone surveys: The total design method. New York: Wiley & Sons.
6.
FowlerF. J. (1988). Survey research methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
7.
FowlerF. J., & MangioneT. W. (1990). Standardized survey interviewing: Minimizing interviewer-related error. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
8.
FreemanH. E.KiecoltK. J.NichollsW. L., & ShanksJ. M. (1982). Telephone sampling bias in surveying disability. Public Opinion Quarterly, 46, 392–407.
9.
GrovesR., & KahnR. (1979). Surveys by telephone: A national comparison with personal interviews. New York: Academic Press.
10.
HinojosaJ. (1990). How mothers of preschool children with cerebral palsy perceive occupational and physical therapists and their influence on family life. The Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 10, 144–162.
11.
HinojosaJ.AndersonJ., & RanumG. W. (1988). Relationships between therapists and parents of preschool children with cerebral palsy: A survey. The Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 8, 285–297.
12.
HumphryR., & LinkS. (1990). Preparation of occupational therapists to work in early intervention programs. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 44, 828–833.
13.
HumphryR., & HanftB. E. (1989). Training occupational therapists in early intervention. Infants and Young Children, 2(4), 54–65.
14.
LavrakasP. J. (1987). Telephone survey methods: Sampling, selection, and supervision. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
15.
LawlorM. C., & HendersonA. (1989). A descriptive study of the clinical practice patterns of occupational therapists working with infants and young children. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 43, 755–764.
16.
MadillH. M.BrintnellE. S.StewinL. L.FitzsimmonsG. W., & MacnabD. (1985). Career patterns in two groups of Alberta occupational therapists. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 52, 195–201.
17.
MannW. C. (1985). Survey methods. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 39, 640–648.
18.
MarcusA. C., & CraneL. A. (1986). Telephone surveys in public health research. Medical Care, 24(2), 97–112.
19.
MasseyJ. T. (1986). The emergence of telephone interviewing in survey research. Medical Care, 24(2), 95–96.
20.
MattinglyC. (1991). Narrative reflections on practical actions: Two learning experiments in reflective storytelling. In SchonD. (Ed.), The reflective turn: Case studies in and on educational practice (pp. 235–257). New York: Teachers College Press.
21.
MishlerE. G. (1986). Research interviewing: Context and narrative. Cambridge, MA: Harvard.
22.
NelsonC. E.CashS. H., & BauerD. E. (1990). Adult physical dysfunction in professional curricula. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 44, 1079–1087.
23.
NiehausA. N.BundyA. C.MattinglyC. F., & LawlorM. C. (1991). Making a difference: Occupational therapy in the public schools. The Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 11, 195–212.
24.
PartenM. (1966). Surveys, polls, and samples: Practical procedures. New York: Cooper Square.
25.
PattonM. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
26.
RiderB. A. (1989). A comparison of curriculum directors, aspiring curriculum directors, and faculty members in occupational therapy. The Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 9, 131–142.
27.
TaylorS. J., & BogdanR. (1984). Introduction of qualitative research methods: The search for meanings (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
28.
TaylorE., & MitchellM. (1990). Research attitudes and activities of occupational therapy clinicians. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 44, 350–362.
29.
TysonR., & StrongJ. (1990). Adaptive equipment: Its effectiveness for people with chronic low back pain. The Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 10, 111–121.
