This study sought to examine how occupational therapists (OTs) who utilize the Model of Human Occupation as their primary practice model applied concepts of this model to describe the occupational functioning of their clients. A telephone survey method was created to elicit quantitative and qualitative data. The findings suggest that therapists value the holistic approach of this model and often incorporate parts of other practice models into it, although sometimes they ignore conceptual differences between the models. Therapists questioned found major concepts of the model useful for conceptualizing their clients' occupational functioning, but found the further subdivision of major concepts into several variables to be less useful. These preliminary findings and how they relate to the model as a practice theory are examined, and the parts of the theory that may bear refinement or change are discussed.
AllenC. K. (1985). Occupational therapy for psychiatric disease: Measurement and management of cognitive disabilities. Boston: Little, Brown & Co.
2.
AllenC. K., & AllenR. E. (1987). Cognitive disabilities: Measuring the social consequences of mental disorders. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 48, 185–190.
3.
AyresA. J. (1973). Sensory integration and learning disorders. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.
4.
BarrisR. (1984). Toward an image of one's own: Sources of variation in the role of occupational therapists in psychosocial practice. The Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 4, 3–23.
5.
BarrisR. (1987). Clinical reasoning in psychosocial occupational therapy: The evaluation process. The Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 7, 147–161.
6.
BarrisR.KielhofnerG.LevineR. E., & NevilleA. (1985). Occupation as interaction with the environment. In KielhofnerG. (Ed.), A model of human occupation: Theory and application (pp. 42–62). Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.
7.
BruceM. A., & BorgB. (1987). Frames of reference in psychosocial occupational therapy. Thorofare, NJ: Slack.
8.
BurkeJ. P. (1983). Defining occupation: Importing and organizing disciplinary knowledge. In KielhofnerG. (Ed.), Health through occupation (pp. 125–138). Philadelphia: F. A. Davis.
9.
CottrellR. F. (1990). Perceived competence among occupational therapists in mental health. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 44, 118–124.
10.
DuncombeL., & HoweM. C. (1985) Group work in occupational therapy: A survey of practice. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 39, 163–170.
11.
FidlerG. S. (1982). The lifestyle performance profile: An organizing frame. In HemphillB. (Ed.), The evaluative process in psychiatric occupational therapy (pp. 43–47). Thorofare, NJ: Slack.
12.
FidlerG. S. (1988). The lifestyle performance profile. In RobertsonS. (Ed.), SCOPE: Strategies, concepts and opportunities for program development and evaluation (pp. 35–40). Rockville, MD: American Occupational Therapy Association.
13.
FidlerG. S., & FidlerJ. (1963). Occupational therapy: A communicative process in psychiatry. New York: Macmillan.
14.
FlemingM. (1991). The therapist with the three-track mind. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 45, 1007–1014.
15.
FowlerF. (1984). Survey research methods. Beverly Hills: Sage Press.
16.
FoxJ. V. (1981). Occupational therapy theory development: Knowledge and values held by recent graduates. The Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 1, 79–93.
17.
KielhofnerG. (1985). A model of human occupation: Theory and application. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.
18.
KielhofnerG. (1992). Conceptual foundations of occupational therapy. Philadelphia: F.A. Davis.
19.
KielhofnerG., & BurkeJ. P. (1985). Components and determinants of human occupation. In KielhofnerG. (Ed.), A model of human occupation: Theory and application (pp. 12–36). Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.
20.
KingL. J. (1974). A sensory integrative approach to schizophrenia. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 28, 529–536.
21.
LawlorM. (1989). A study of the clinical practice patterns of occupational therapists who work with infants and young children. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Sergent College, Boston University, Boston, MA.
22.
LlorensL. (1976). Application of a developmental theory for health and rehabilitation. Rockville, MD: American Occupational Therapy Association.
23.
MattinglyC. (1991). The narrative nature of clinical reasoning. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 45, 998–1006.
24.
MoseyA. C. (1970). Three frames of reference in mental health. Thorofare, NJ: Slack.
25.
MoseyA. C. (1986). Psychosocial components of occupational therapy. New York: Raven Press.
26.
ParhamD. L. (1986). Applying theory to practice. In Target 2000: Occupational Therapy Education. Rockville, MD: American Occupational Therapy Association.
27.
ReedK. L. (1984). Models of practice in occupational therapy. Baltimore: William & Wilkins.
28.
Research information and evaluation division, American Occupational Therapy Association. (1991, June 6). Summary report: 1990 member data survey [Insert]. OT Week, pp. 1–8.
29.
RogersJ. C. (1983). Clinical reasoning: The ethics, science and art. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 37, 601–616.
30.
RogersJ. C. (1986). Clinical judgment: The bridge between theory and practice. In Target 2000: Occupational Therapy Education. Rockville, MD: American Occupational Therapy Association.
31.
RogersJ. C., & HolmM. B. (1991). Occupational therapy diagnostic reasoning: A component of clinical reasoning. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 45, 1045–1053.
32.
RogersJ. C., & MasagataniG. (1982). Clinical reasoning of occupational therapists during the initial assessment of physically disabled patients. The Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 2, 195–219.
33.
SalzC. (1983). A theoretical approach to the treatment of work difficulties in borderline personalities. Occupational Therapy in Mental Health, 3(3), 33–46.
34.
SchonD. (1983). The reflective practitioner. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
35.
SeidelJ. V.KjolsethR., & SeymourE. (1988). The Ethnograph. Colorado: Qualis Research Associates.
36.
SPSS. (1989). SPSS/PC+ V 3.1 base manual [Computer program manual]. Chicago: SPSS.
37.
Van DeusenJ. (1985). Relationship of occupational therapists education and experience to perceived value of theory development. The Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 5, 223–232.
