Qualitative Research: Not Another Orthodoxy

Agar M. H. (1983). Ethnographic evidence. Urban Life, 12, 32–48.

Guba E. G. (1981). Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries. Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 29, 75–91.

Kielhofner G. (1982). Qualitative research: Part two. Methodological approaches and relevance to occupational therapy. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 2, 150–170.

Krefting L. (in press). Rigor in qualitative research: The assessment of trustworthiness. American Journal of Occupational Therapy.

Lincoln Y. S. , & Guba E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.

Lincoln Y. S. , & Guba E. G. (1986). But is it rigorous? Trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic inquiry. In Williams D. D. (Ed.), Naturalistic Evaluation. New Dimensions for Program Evaluation, No. 30 (pp. 73–84). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Rowles G. D. (1978). Reflections on experiential fieldwork. In Ley D. & Samuels M. (Eds.), Humanistic Geography: Prospects and Problems (pp. 173–193). New York: John Wiley.

Schatzman L. , & Strauss A. L. (1973). Field Research. Strategies for a Natural Sociology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

Strauss A. L. (1988). A new climate for qualitative research. In Reinharz S. & Rowles G. D. (Eds.), Qualitative Gerontology (pp. 299–303). New York: Springer Publishing Co.

Wehlage G. (1981). The purpose of generalization in field study research. In Popkewitz T. S. & Tabachnick B. R. (Eds.), The Study of Schooling. Field-Based Methodologies in Educational Research and Evaluation (pp. 211–241). New York: Praeger.