The test-retest reliability and the day-to-day variability of an isometric grip strength test using the power grip attachment of the Baltimore Therapeutic Equipment Work Simulator were investigated for three methods of determining a criterion score. These methods were the mean of three trials, the mean of the best two of three trials, and the best score of three trials. Subjects included 30 right-dominant males and females, 20 to 45 years old. The method with the highest test-retest reliability and the lowest day-to-day variability was the mean of three trials. The reliability coefficients were .978 for the right hand and .987 for the left hand. The day-to-day variability was 4.99% for the right hand and 3.04% for the left hand. Based on the results of this study, it is recommended that the mean of three trials should be used to determine the criterion score when evaluating isometric grip strength with the work simulator.
AstrandP., & RodahlK. (1986). Textbook of work physiology: Physiological bases of exercise (pp. 342). New York: McGraw Hill.
2.
Baltimore Therapeutic Equipment Company. (1986). Operations manual for the Baltimore Therapeutic Equipment Company Work Simulator. Baltimore: Author.
3.
BaumgartnerT. (1974). Criterion score for multiple trial measures. Research Quarterly, 45, 193–198.
4.
BaumgartnerT. A., & JacksonA. S. (1982). Measurement for evaluation in physical education (2nd ed., pp. 98–102). Dubuque, IA: Wm. C. Brown Co.
5.
BaxterP. L., & FriedS. L. (1984). The work tolerance program of the Hand Rehabilitation Center in Philadelphia. In HunterJ. M.SchneiderL. H.MackinE. J., & CallahanA. D. (Eds.), Rehabilitation of the Hand (2nd ed., pp. 889–899). St. Louis: C. V. Mosby.
6.
BelangerA. Y., & McComasA. J. (1981). Extent of motor unit activation during effort. Journal of Applied Physiology, Respiratory, Environmental and Exercise Physiology, 51, 1131–1135.
7.
BohannonR. W. (1986a). Upper extremity strength and strength relationships among young women. Journal of Orthopedic and Sports Physical Therapy, 7, 128–133.
8.
BohannonR. W. (1986b). Test-retest reliability of hand-held dynamometry during a single session of strength assessment. Physical Therapy, 66, 206–209.
9.
CatheyM. A.WolfeF., & KleinhekselS. M. (1988). Functional ability and work status in patients with fibromyalgia. Arthritis Care and Research, 1, 85–98.
10.
ChaffinD. B.HerrinG. D.KeyserlingW. M., & GargA. (1977). A method for evaluating biomechanical stresses resulting from manual materials handling jobs. American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal, 38, 662–675.
11.
CurrierD. P. (1984). Elements of research in physical therapy (2nd ed.). Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.
12.
CurtisR. M.ClarkG. L., & SnyderR. (1984). The work simulator. In HunterJ. M.SchneiderL. H.MackinE. J., & CallahanA. D. (Eds.), Rehabilitation of the Hand (2nd ed., pp. 905–908). St. Louis: C. V. Mosby.
13.
CurtisR. M., & EngalitcheffB. M. E. (1981). A work simulator for rehabilitating the upper extremity—preliminary report. Journal of Hand Surgery, 6, 499–501.
14.
GrindulisK. A., & CalverleyM. (1983). Grip strength: Peak or sustained pressure in rheumatoid arthritis?Journal of Chronic Disease, 36, 855–858.
15.
GrovesE. J., & RiderB. A. (1989). A comparison of treatment approaches used after carpal tunnel release surgery. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 43, 398–402.
16.
HazeltonF. T.SmidtG. L., & FlattA. E. (1975). The influence of wrist position on the force produced by the finger flexers. Journal of Biomechanics, 8, 301–306.
17.
HettingerT. (1961). Physiology of strength (p. 30). Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
18.
HookW. E., & StanleyJ. K. (1986). Assessment of thumb to index pulp to pulp grip strengths. Journal of Hand Surgery, 11B, 91–92.
19.
IkaiM., & SteinhausA. H. (1961). Some factors modifying the expression of human strength. Journal of Applied Physiology, 16, 157–163.
20.
JonesR. E. (1962). Reliability of muscle strength testing under varying motivational conditions. Journal of the American Physical Therapy Association, 42, 240–243.
21.
JohanssonC. A.KentB. E., & ShepardK. F. (1983). Relationship between verbal command volume and magnitude of muscle contraction. Physical Therapy, 63, 1260–1265.
22.
KellorM.FrostJ.SilberbergN.IversonI., & CummingsR. (1971). Hand strength and dexterity norms for clinical use. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 25, 77–83.
23.
KingJ. W., & BerryhillB. H. (1988). A comparison of two static grip testing methods and its clinical applications: A preliminary study. Journal of Hand Therapy, 1, 204–208.
24.
KraftG. H., & DetelsP. E. (1972). Position of function of the wrist. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 53, 272–275.
25.
MathiowetzV.RennellsC., & DonahoeL. (1985). Effect of elbow position on grip and key pinch strength. Journal of Hand Surgery, 10A, 694–697.
26.
MathiowetzV.WeberK.VollandG., & KashmanN. (1984). Reliability and validity of grip and pinch evaluations. Journal of Hand Surgery, 9A, 222–226.
27.
MoritaniT., & DeVriesH. A. (1979). Neural factors versus hypertrophy in the time course of human strength gain. American Journal of Physical Medicine, 58, 115–130.
28.
SealsD. R.ChaseP. B., & TaylorJ. A. (1988). Automatic mediation of the pressor responses to isometric exercise in humans. Journal of Applied Physiology, 64, 2190–2196.
29.
SchenckJ. M., & ForwardE. M. (1965). Quantitative strength changes with test repetitions. Physical Therapy, 45, 562–569.
30.
SheehanN. J.SheldonF., & MarksD. (1983). Grip strength and torquometry in assessment of hand function in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. British Journal of Rheumatology, 22, 158–164.
31.
TeraokaT. (1979). Studies on the peculiarity of grip strength in relation to body positions and aging. Kobe Journal of Medical Science, 25, 1–17y.
32.
ThorngrenK. G., & WernerC. O. (1979). Normal grip strength. Acta Orthopedics Scandinavica, 50, 255–279.
33.
TrossmanP. B., & LiP., (1989). The effect of the duration of intertrial rest periods on isometric grip strength performance in young adults. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 2, 362–378.
