Problem Solving and Time: Functions of Learning Style and Teaching Methods

Abstract

The purpose of the two studies reported in this paper was first, to investigate the interaction between occupational therapy students' learning styles and teaching methods on their problem solving ability and the amount of time they needed to learn outside of class; and second, to replicate in Israel the original study conducted in the United States, to validate the findings in another culture. In support of the hypothesis, results from multiple regression analyses using problem solving and time as dependent variables showed significant interactions of teaching methods and individual learning styles in both studies. Occupational therapy students in “matched” conditions (reflective learning style in lectures and active learning style in group discussions) performed better on problem solving measures and needed less time to learn outside class than those in the opposite “mismatched” conditions. The results also indicate that to achieve criterion level in a specific subject matter, time is used to compensate for “mismatch” of individual aptitudes and learning environment. Implications of the findings on planning learning programs are discussed.

Keywords

occupational therapy students individual characteristics aptitude treatment interaction

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Barris

Kielhofner

, & Bauer

(1985). Learning preferences, values and student satisfaction. Journal of Allied Health, 14, 13–23.

Bloom

B. S.

(1956). Taxonomy of education objectives. New York: David McKay.

Bloom

B. S.

(1974). Time and learning. American Psychologist, 29, 682–688.

Bloom

B. S.

(1976). Human characteristics and school learning. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Cahill

, & Madigan

M. J.

(1984). The influence of curriculum format on learning preference and learning style. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 38, 683–686.

Carrol

J. B.

(1963). A model for school learning. Teachers College Record, 63, 723–732.

Cronbach

L. J.

, & Snow

R. E.

(1977). Aptitude and instructional methods. New York: Irvington.

Cunningham

M. J.

, & Trickey

B. A.

(1983). The correlation of learning styles with students performance in academic and clincal course work. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 3, 54–55.

Curry

(1983). Learning style in continuing medical education. Ottawa: Council on Medical Education, Canada Medical Association.

10.

Gagne

R. M.

(1977). The conditions of learning. (3rd ed., p. 155) New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

11.

Gettinger

(1984a). Individual differences in time needed for learning: A review of literature. Educational Psychologist, 19, 1, 15–29.

12.

Gettinger

(1984b). Achievement as a function of time spent in learning and the needed for learning. American Educational Research Journal, 21, 3, 617–628.

13.

Karweit

(1985). Should we lengthen the school term. Educational Researcher, 14, 6, 9–14.

14.

Katz

(1981). The interactive effects of occupational therapy students' learning style with teaching methods. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.

15.

Katz

(1986). Construct validity of Kolb's learning style inventory using factor analysis and Guttman's Smallest Space Analysis. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 63, 1323–1326.

16.

Katz

(1988). Individual learning style: Israeli norms and cross-cultural equivalence of Kolb's learning style inventory (LSI), Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 19, 361–379.

17.

Kerlinger

P. N.

, & Pedhazur

E. J.

(1973). Multiple regression in behavioral research. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

18.

Kolb

D. A.

(1976). The learning style inventory: Technical manual (pp. 1–47). Boston: McBer.

19.

Kolb

D. A.

(1984). Experimental learning: Experience as a source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice Hall.

20.

McGuire

C. H.

Salomon

L. M.

, & Bashook

P. G.

(1976). Construction and use of written simulations. New York: The Psychological Co.

21.

Messick

(Ed.). (1976). Individuality in learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

22.

Newble

D. I.

, & Entwistle

N. J.

(1986). Learning styles and approaches implications for medical education. Medical Education, 20, 162–175.

23.

Pask

(1976). Styles and strategies of learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 128–148.

24.

Rezler

A. G.

, & French

R. M.

(1975). Personality types and learning preferences of students in six allied health professions. Journal of Allied Health, 4, 20–26.

25.

Rogers

J. C.

, & Hill

D. J.

(1980). Learning style preferences of bachelor's and master's students in occupational therapy. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 34, 789–793.

26.

Snow

R. E.

Federico

P. A.

, & Montague

W. E.

(Eds.). (1980). Aptitude Learning and Instruction (Vol. 1, 2). Hillsdale, N. J.: Lawrence Enblaum Associates.

27.

Stafford

E. M.

(1986). Relationship between occupational therapy student learning styles and clinical performance. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 40, 34–39.

28.

Terman

L. M.

(1973). Concept Mastery Test(CMT) — Form T. New York: The Psychological Corporation.

29.

Vittetoe

M. C.

, & Hooker

(1983). Learning style preferences of allied health practitioners in a teacher education progam. Journal of Allied Health, 12, 48–55.

30.

Wang

M. C.

, & Lindvall

C. M.

(1984). Individual differences and school learning environments. In Gordon

E. W.

(Ed.), Review of Research in Education (pp. 161–225). Washington, D. C.: American Educational Research Association.