The purpose of this study was to examine the content validity of the Test of Orientation for Rehabilitation Patients (TORP). Content validity was examined at both the item and domain levels using an interdisciplinary group of 11 content experts. At the item level, percent agreement with the intended domain and item-objective congruence were evaluated in tandem. At the domain level, Lu's coefficient of agreement was calculated. Results of the analyses provided moderate to strong support for the retention of 46 of the TORP's 49 items and for grouping the items by domain of orientation. This study exemplified a quantitative approach to the examination of content validity using content experts.
CaplanB. (1982). Neuropsychology in rehabilitation: Its role in evaluation and intervention. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 63, 362–366.
2.
DeitzJ. C.BeemanC.ThornD. (1986). Test of Orientation for Rehabilitation Patients (TORP). Seattle, Washington: University of Washington.
3.
HambletonR. K.SwaminathanH.AlginaJ.CoulsonD. B. (1978). Criterion-referenced testing and measurement: A review of technical issues and developments. Review of Educational Research, 48, 1–47.
4.
LuK. H. (1971). A measure of agreement among subjective judgments. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 31, 75–84.
5.
PolitD.HunglerB. (1978). Nursing research: Principles and Methods. Philadelphia: Lippincott.
6.
RobertsA. H. (1979). Severe accidental head injury: An assessment of long-term prognosis. London, England: MacMillan.
7.
RovinelliR. J.HambletonR. K. (1977). On the use of content specialists in the assessment of criterion-referenced test item validity. Dutch Journal for Educational Research, 2, 49–60.
8.
ThornD. W.DeitzJ. C. (1989). Examining content validity through the use of content experts. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 10, 334–346.
