Three occupational therapy Level II fieldwork environments—mental health, adult physical disabilities, and pediatrics—were evaluated with the naturalistic inquiry methodology. Students and supervisors described and compared and contrasted ideal clinical education environments with actual Level II fieldwork environments. The naturalistic inquiry methodology and the salient factors in each of the three evaluated environments are summarized.
ChristieB. A.JoyceP. C.MoellerP. L. (1985a). Fieldwork experience, part I: Impact on practice preference. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 39, 671–674.
2.
ChristieB. A.JoyceP. C.MoellerP. L. (1985b). Fieldwork experience, part II: The supervisor's dilemma. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 39, 675–681.
3.
ConyneR.ClackR. (1981). Environmental assessment and design. New York: Prager.
4.
EzerskyS.HavazeletL.ScottA. HillerZettlerC. L. B. (1989). Specialty choice in occupational therapy. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 43, 227–233.
5.
GubaE.LincolnY. (1987a). Effective evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
6.
GubaE.LincolnY. (1987b). Epistemological and methodological bases of naturalistic inquiry. In MadausG.ScrivenM.StufflebeamD. (Eds.), Evaluation models: Viewpoint on educational and human services evaluation (pp. 311–331). Boston: Klewer-Nijhoff.
7.
LincolnY.GubaE. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
8.
MorganD. L. (1988). Focus groups as qualitative research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
9.
NystromE. (1986). The differentiation between academic and fieldwork education. In Occupational therapy education: Target 2000: Proceedings (pp. 90–94). Rockville, MD: American Occupational Therapy Association.
10.
PattonM. Q. (1980). Qualitative evaluation method. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
11.
PattonM. Q. (1987). Creative evaluation. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
12.
SchwandtT. A.HalpernE. S. (1988). Linking auditing and meta-evaluation: Enhancing quality in applied research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
