There is a shortage of qualified occupational therapy faculty members who are interested in becoming curriculum directors. This study presents the results of a mail survey used to compare the demographic, educational, and career characteristics of three groups involved with occupational therapy education: curriculum directors, faculty members interested in becoming curriculum directors, and faculty members not interested in becoming curriculum directors. Although the results of the survey do not show clear and distinct profiles for each of the three groups, interesting similarities and differences do exist. In general, differences between men and women were greater than differences between groups.
BanducciR. (1976). The effect of mother's employment on the achievement, aspirations, and expectations of the child. Personnel and Guidance Journal, 46, 263–267.
2.
BirdG. W. (1984). Family and career characteristics of women and men college and university administrators. Journal of National Association of Women Deans, Administrators and Counselors, 47(4), 21–28.
3.
EbleK. E. (1978). The art of administration. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
4.
EtaughC. (1984). Women faculty and administrators in higher education: Changes in their status since 1972. Journal of National Association of Women Deans, Administrators and Counselors, 48(1), 21–25.
5.
FurnissW. T.GrahamP. A. (Eds.). (1974). Women in higher education. Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
6.
HennigM.JardimA. (1977). The managerial woman. Garden City, NY: Anchor Press.
7.
JantzenA. (1972). Some characteristics of female occupational therapists—Part III: A comparison: Faculty and clinical practitioners. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 26, 150–154.
8.
MorrisE. B. (1982). Women in educational leadership positions: An investigation of some common factors in socialization, educational background, and career commitment (Doctoral dissertation, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo). Dissertation Abstracts International, 8224357.
ParhamD. (1985). Academic reward structures and occupational therapy faculty. Part I: Characteristics of Faculty. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 5, 83–100.
11.
RiderB. A. (1988). Men in occupational therapy. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 42, 231–237.
12.
SchlackM. J. (1974). A comparison of personal characteristics and leadership styles of university upper-management and middle-management women student personnel administrators. Dissertation Abstracts International, 35, 852A–853A. (University Microfilms No. 74-19, 076).
13.
SiegK. W. (1986). Chairing the academic department: A job analysis. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 40, 89–95.
14.
TouchtonJ.ShavlikD. (1984). Senior women administrators in higher education: A decade of change, 1975–1983. Washington, DC: American Council on Education, Office of Women in Higher Education.
15.
TuckerA. (1981). Chairing the academic department: Leadership among peers. Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
16.
VogelS. R. (1970). Maternal employment and perception of sex roles among college students. Developmental Psychology, 3, 384–391.
17.
WaggamanJ. S. (1982). A program evaluation of the department chairpersons. (Project sponsored by the W. K. Kellogg Foundation and the State University System of Florida, 1977–1981.) Tallahassee, FL: Florida State University. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 231 268).
