AgarM. H. (1983). Ethnographic evidence. Urban Life, 12(1), 32–48.
2.
CapraF. (1982). The turning pointNew York: Bantam.
3.
DePoyE.MerrillS. C. (1988). Value acquisition in an occupational therapy curriculum. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 8, 259–274.
4.
GeertzC. (1973). Thick description: Toward an interpretive theory of cultures. In GeertzC. (Ed.), The interpretation of culture: Selected essays (pp. 3–30). New York: Basic Books.
5.
GubaE. G. (1981). Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries. Educational Communication & Technology. A Journal of Theory, Research and Development, 29, 75–91.
6.
KielhofnerG. (1982a). Qualitative research: Part one—Paradigmatic grounds and issues of reliability and validity. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 2, 67–79.
7.
KielhofnerG. (1982b). Qualitative research: Part two—Methodological approaches and relevance to occupational therapy. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 2, 150–164.
8.
LincolnY.GubaE.G. (1986). But is it rigorous? Trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic inquiry. In WilliamsD. D. (Ed.), Naturalistic evaluation New dimensions for program evaluation, No 30. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
9.
PattonM.Q. (1980). Qualitative evaluation methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
10.
SchönD. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in actionNew York: Basic Books.
11.
SpradleyJ. P.McCurdyD. W. (1972). The cultural experience Ethnography in a complex society. Chicago: Science Research Associates.
12.
WehlageG. (1981). The purpose of generalization in field study research. In PopkewitzT. S.TabachnickB. R. (Eds.), The study of schooling. Field-based methodologies in educational research and evaluationNew York: Praeger.