Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The relationship between manual midline crossing and hand preference was studied in 200 2- to 6-year-old children. Performance patterns of right-, left-, and mixed-handed children were compared. Right- and left-handed children exhibited significantly greater frequency of preferred than nonpreferred hand use for total hand use and for contralateral hand responses. The right-handed group showed a developmental trend for contralateral hand responses, with age-related changes due to a progressive increase in frequency of contralateral right (preferred) hand responses. The mixed-handed group displayed a weak preference toward use of the right hand for total hand use and for contralateral hand responses. A general reduction in frequency of midline crossing cited within the mixed-handed group was due to reduced frequency of contralateral right-hand responses. The theoretical significance of the research findings and their implications for sensory integration test interpretation are discussed.

Keywords

sensory integration hemispheric specialization

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ayres

A. J.

(1969). Deficits in sensory integration in educationally handicapped children. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 2, 160–168.

Ayres

A. J.

(1971). Characteristics of types of sensory integrative dysfunction. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 25, 329–334.

Ayres

A. J.

(1972). Sensory integration and learning disorders. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.

Ayres

A. J.

(1976a). Sensory integrative dysfunction: Theory and therapy. Discussion presented at a conference on sensory integrative dysfunction, Chicago.

Ayres

A. J.

(1976b). Interpreting the Southern California Sensory Integration Tests. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.

Ayres

A. J.

(1977). Cluster analysis of measures of sensory integration. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 31, 362–366.

Cermak

S. A.

Ayres

A. J.

(1984). Crossing the body midline in learning-disabled and normal children. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 38, 35–39.

Cermak

S. A.

Quintero

E. J.

Cohen

(1980). Developmental age trends in crossing the body midline in normal four through eight year old children. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 34, 313–319.

Denckla

M. B.

(1973). Development of speed in repetitive and successive finger-movements in normal children. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 15, 635–645.

10.

Frankenburg

Dodds

Fandal

Kazuk

Cohrs

(1975). Denver Developmental Screening Test reference manual. Denver: University of Colorado Medical Center, W. E. Frankenburg.

11.

Kephart

N. C.

(1960). The slow learner in the classroom. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill Company.

12.

Liederman

(1983). Mechanisms underlying instability in the development of hand preference. In Young

Segalowitz

S. J.

Carter

C. M.

Trehub

S. E.

(Eds.), Manual specialization and the developing brain (pp. 82–83). New York: Academic Press.

13.

Schofield

W. N.

(1976a). Do children find movements which cross the body midline difficult? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 28, 571–582.

14.

Schofield

W. N.

(1976b). Hand movements which cross the body midline: Findings relating age differences to handedness. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 42, 643–646.

15.

Stilwell

J. M.

(1981). Relationship between development of the body-righting reaction and manual midline crossing behavior in the learning disabled. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 35, 391–398.

16.

Wapner

Cirillo

(1968). Imitation of a model's hand movements: Age changes in transportation of left-right relations. Child Development, 39, 887–894.

Relationship between Manual Midline Crossing and Hand Preference

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References